IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8244-d1150397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alleviating the Bauxite Maritime Supply Chain Risks through Resilient Strategies: QFD-MCDM with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jiachen Sun

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Haiyan Wang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhimin Cui

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

Abstract

With the development of the global economy and energy supply chain, the uncertainty and complexity of the bauxite maritime supply chain (BMSC) has been further increased. Determining the crucial risks and improving the supply chain’s resilient capacity based on operation objectives has become important, in order to ensure the sustainability and competitiveness of the BMSC. This paper combines quality function deployment (QFD), a multi-criteria decision method (MCDM), and intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS); an integrated methodology is developed to achieve efficient design of BMSC resilient strategies (RESs), taking into account both customer requirements (CRs) and risk factors (RFs). A combined weighting method is employed to determine each CR’s importance. A decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is adopted to determine the RFs’ interrelationships. The results obtained with the MCDM are incorporated into QFD to construct a two-stage house of quality (HoQ) model, which transforms CRs into RFs, and then into RESs. The real case of the Guinea–China bauxite import supply chain is studied to demonstrate the applicability and validity of the proposed framework. Research results reveal that the most important CR is ‘stability’. ‘Information sharing asymmetry’, ‘poor ship stability or obsolete equipment performance’, and ‘lack of coordination between shipping and ports’ are the most severe risks impacting the operation of supply chain. Furthermore, ‘constructing strategic alliances’ contributes to alleviating potential risks, optimizing the allocation of resources, and finally, improving the resilience of the BMSC significantly. This paper will help managers to understand how to achieve sustainable development of the supply chain through resilient strategies, and will aid rational decision-making in the management and operation of a resilient BMSC for alleviating risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiachen Sun & Haiyan Wang & Zhimin Cui, 2023. "Alleviating the Bauxite Maritime Supply Chain Risks through Resilient Strategies: QFD-MCDM with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8244-:d:1150397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Venkatesh, Mani, 2021. "Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    3. Suryawanshi, Pravin & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Optimization models for supply chains under risk, uncertainty, and resilience: A state-of-the-art review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Zanon, Lucas Gabriel & Marcelloni, Francesco & Gerolamo, Mateus Cecílio & Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar, 2021. "Exploring the relations between supply chain performance and organizational culture: A fuzzy grey group decision model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Roberto Dominguez & Borja Ponte & Salvatore Cannella & Jose M. Framinan, 2019. "Building Resilience in Closed-Loop Supply Chains through Information-Sharing Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-4, November.
    6. Jia, Xiaohui & Zhang, Donghui, 2021. "Prediction of maritime logistics service risks applying soft set based association rule: An early warning model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Saaty, Thomas L. & Shang, Jennifer S., 2011. "An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 703-715, November.
    8. Asadabadi, Ali & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2020. "Maritime port network resiliency and reliability through co-opetition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Gupta, Himanshu & Yadav, Avinash Kumar & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed & Sharma, Shashi Chandra, 2022. "Strategies to overcome barriers to innovative digitalisation technologies for supply chain logistics resilience during pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Li, Wenjie & Asadabadi, Ali & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2022. "Enhancing resilience through port coalitions in maritime freight networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1-23.
    11. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    12. Massari, Giovanni Francesco & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "Investigating the effect of horizontal coopetition on supply chain resilience in complex and turbulent environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Narasimha, Prathvi Thumbe & Jena, Pradyot Ranjan & Majhi, Ritanjali, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 on the Indian seaport transportation and maritime supply chain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 191-203.
    14. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    15. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Lina He & Zhenyong Wu & Wei Xiang & Mark Goh & Zhitao Xu & Wenyan Song & Xinguo Ming & Xiao Wu, 2021. "A novel Kano-QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1714-1735, March.
    17. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.
    18. Chengpeng Wan & Zaili Yang & Di Zhang & Xinping Yan & Shiqi Fan, 2018. "Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 479-498, July.
    19. Jafar Namdar & Xueping Li & Rupy Sawhney & Ninad Pradhan, 2018. "Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2339-2360, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Li & Chen, Tingting & Liu, Zhongshan & Yu, Bin & Wang, Yunpeng, 2024. "Analysis of multi-modal public transportation system performance under metro disruptions: A dynamic resilience assessment framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Dui, Hongyan & Zheng, Xiaoqian & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Debashree Das & Avik Datta & Patanjal Kumar & Yigit Kazancoglu & Mangey Ram, 2022. "Building supply chain resilience in the era of COVID-19: An AHP-DEMATEL approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 249-267, June.
    4. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Yi Zheng & Li Liu & Victor Shi & Wenxing Huang & Jianxiu Liao, 2022. "A Resilience Analysis of a Medical Mask Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simulation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Chervenkova, Tanya & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Adaptation strategies for building supply chain viability: A case study analysis of the global automotive industry re-purposing during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Yang, Zhisen & Wan, Chengpeng & Yu, Qing & Yin, Jingbo & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "A machine learning-based Bayesian model for predicting the duration of ship detention in PSC inspection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Mukesh Kumar & Rakesh D. Raut & Mahak Sharma & Vikas Kumar Choubey & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2022. "Enablers for resilience and pandemic preparedness in food supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1198-1223, December.
    12. Li, Guo & Xue, Jing & Li, Na & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2022. "Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    14. Jebum Pyun & Jin Sung Rha, 2021. "Review of Research on Digital Supply Chain Management Using Network Text Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Gebhardt, Maximilian & Spieske, Alexander & Kopyto, Matthias & Birkel, Hendrik, 2022. "Increasing global supply chains’ resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 59-72.
    16. Chih-Hung Hsu & An-Yuan Chang & Ting-Yi Zhang & Wei-Da Lin & Wan-Ling Liu, 2021. "Deploying Resilience Enablers to Mitigate Risks in Sustainable Fashion Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Chih-Hung Hsu & Xu He & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Wan-Ling Liu & Zhi-Qiang Lin, 2022. "Enhancing Supply Chain Agility with Industry 4.0 Enablers to Mitigate Ripple Effects Based on Integrated QFD-MCDM: An Empirical Study of New Energy Materials Manufacturers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-35, May.
    18. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2021. "On the risk-averse selection of resilient multi-tier supply portfolio," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    20. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8244-:d:1150397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.