IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjtl/v5y2016i1d10.1007_s13676-014-0047-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Day-to-day travel time perception modeling using an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)

Author

Listed:
  • Navid Khademi

    (University of Tehran)

  • Mojtaba Rajabi

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Afshin S. Mohaymany

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Mahdi Samadzad

    (University of Tehran)

Abstract

Travel time perception and learning play a central role in the modeling of day-to-day travel choice dynamics in traffic networks and have attracted the attention of many researchers, specifically for the analysis and operation of intelligent transportation systems and travel demand management scenarios. In this paper, a fuzzy learning model is proposed to capture the mechanism by which travelers update their travel time perceptions from one day to the next, taking into account their experienced travel times. To capture travelers’ mental representations of uncertain travel time involving imprecision and uncertainty, a combined artificial neural network and fuzzy logic (neuro-fuzzy) architecture called adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system is employed. This framework, which utilizes a set of fuzzy if–then rules, can serve as a basis for modeling the qualitative sides of travelers’ knowledge and reasoning processes. From the output of this study, the results of our laboratory-like experiment provide a good fit to the stated data of travelers’ behavior, and may reflect the fact that the neuro-fuzzy approach can be considered a promising method in learning and perception updating models. Finally, the proposed learning model is embedded in a microscopic event-based simulation framework to evaluate its credibility within a day-to-day behavior of the traffic network. The results of the simulation, which converge to the equilibrium state of the test network, are finally presented, implying that the proposed perception updating model operates properly.

Suggested Citation

  • Navid Khademi & Mojtaba Rajabi & Afshin S. Mohaymany & Mahdi Samadzad, 2016. "Day-to-day travel time perception modeling using an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 25-52, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13676-014-0047-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13676-014-0047-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13676-014-0047-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13676-014-0047-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ettema, Dick & Tamminga, Guus & Timmermans, Harry & Arentze, Theo, 2005. "A micro-simulation model system of departure time using a perception updating model under travel time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 325-344, May.
    2. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1993. "A Structural Model of Peak-Period Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 161-179, March.
    3. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, September.
    4. Henn, Vincent & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2006. "Handling uncertainty in route choice models: From probabilistic to possibilistic approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1526-1538, December.
    5. Horowitz, Joel L., 1984. "The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 13-28, February.
    6. Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2003. "Modeling learning and adaptation processes in activity-travel choice A framework and numerical experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 37-62, February.
    7. Arslan, Turan & Khisty, Jotin, 2006. "A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 571-583, January.
    8. Teodorovic, Dus[caron]an, 1999. "Fuzzy logic systems for transportation engineering: the state of the art," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 337-364, June.
    9. Teodorovic, Dusan, 1994. "Fuzzy sets theory applications in traffic and transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 379-390, May.
    10. Andre Palma & Moshe Ben-Akiva & David Brownstone & Charles Holt & Thierry Magnac & Daniel McFadden & Peter Moffatt & Nathalie Picard & Kenneth Train & Peter Wakker & Joan Walker, 2008. "Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice models," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 269-285, December.
      • André de Palma & Moshe Ben-Akiva & David Brownstone & Charles Holt & Thierry Magnac & Daniel McFadden & Peter Moffatt & Nathalie Picard & Kenneth Train & Peter Wakker & Joan Walker, 2008. "Risk, Uncertainty and Discrete Choice Models," THEMA Working Papers 2008-02, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    11. Cascetta, Ennio, 1989. "A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Iida, Yasunori & Akiyama, Takamasa & Uchida, Takashi, 1992. "Experimental analysis of dynamic route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 17-32, February.
    13. He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2010. "A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 597-608, May.
    14. Ozlem Yanmaz-Tuzel & Kaan Ozbay, 2009. "Modeling Learning Impacts on Day-to-day Travel Choice," Springer Books, in: William H. K. Lam & S. C. Wong & Hong K. Lo (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, chapter 0, pages 387-401, Springer.
    15. Mahmassani, Hani S. & Chang, Gang-Len, 1986. "Experiments with departure time choice dynamics of urban commuters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 297-320, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khademi, Navid & Kharrazi, Hamed & Chen, Anthony & Chaiyasarn, Krisada & Zerguini, Seghir, 2024. "Departure time choices and a modeling framework for a guidance system," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Xiaomei Zhao & Chunhua Wan & Jun Bi, 2019. "Day-to-Day Assignment Models and Traffic Dynamics Under Information Provision," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 473-502, June.
    3. Xie, Chi & Liu, Zugang, 2014. "On the stochastic network equilibrium with heterogeneous choice inertia," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 90-109.
    4. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    5. G. E. Cantarella & D. P. Watling, 2016. "Modelling road traffic assignment as a day-to-day dynamic, deterministic process: a unified approach to discrete- and continuous-time models," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 69-98, March.
    6. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    7. Paolo Delle Site, 2017. "On the Equivalence Between SUE and Fixed-Point States of Day-to-Day Assignment Processes with Serially-Correlated Route Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 935-962, September.
    8. Zhu, Zheng & Mardan, Atabak & Zhu, Shanjiang & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Capturing the interaction between travel time reliability and route choice behavior based on the generalized Bayesian traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 48-64.
    9. Ye, Hongbo & Xiao, Feng & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Day-to-day dynamics with advanced traveler information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 23-44.
    10. Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2003. "Modeling learning and adaptation processes in activity-travel choice A framework and numerical experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 37-62, February.
    11. Meneguzzer, Claudio, 2022. "Day-to-day dynamics in a simple traffic network with mixed direct and contrarian route choice behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    12. Hamed Alibabai & Hani S. Mahmassani, 2016. "Foxes and sheep: effect of predictive logic in day-to-day dynamics of route choice behavior," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 53-67, March.
    13. Martin L. Hazelton & David P. Watling, 2004. "Computation of Equilibrium Distributions of Markov Traffic-Assignment Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 331-342, August.
    14. Danczyk, Adam & Di, Xuan & Liu, Henry X. & Levinson, David M., 2017. "Unexpected versus expected network disruption: Effects on travel behavior," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 68-78.
    15. van Ackere, Ann & Larsen, Erik R., 2004. "Self-organising behaviour in the presence of negative externalities: A conceptual model of commuter choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 501-513, September.
    16. Giselle Moraes Ramos & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2014. "A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers' Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67, January.
    17. Wei Nai & Zan Yang & Dan Li & Lu Liu & Yuting Fu & Yuao Guo, 2024. "Urban Day-to-Day Travel and Its Development in an Information Environment: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Di, Xuan & Liu, Henry X., 2016. "Boundedly rational route choice behavior: A review of models and methodologies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 142-179.
    19. Ye, Hongbo & Yang, Hai, 2013. "Continuous price and flow dynamics of tradable mobility credits," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 436-450.
    20. Xiao, Yu & Lo, Hong K., 2016. "Day-to-day departure time modeling under social network influence," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 54-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13676-014-0047-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.