IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2572-d1360928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Day-to-Day Travel and Its Development in an Information Environment: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Nai

    (School of Electronic Information, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China
    Huzhou Key Laboratory for Urban Multidimensional Perception and Intelligent Computing, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Zan Yang

    (Public Teaching and Research Department, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Dan Li

    (Public Teaching and Research Department, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Lu Liu

    (School of Business, St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, NY 14778, USA)

  • Yuting Fu

    (School of Electronic Information, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China
    Huzhou Key Laboratory for Urban Multidimensional Perception and Intelligent Computing, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Yuao Guo

    (School of Electronic Information, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China
    Huzhou Key Laboratory for Urban Multidimensional Perception and Intelligent Computing, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China)

Abstract

Urban day-to-day travel systems generally exist in various types of cities. Their modeling is difficult due to the uncertainty of individual travelers in micro travel decision-making. Moreover, with the advent of the information age, intelligent connected vehicles, smartphones, and other types of intelligent terminals have placed urban day-to-day travel systems in an information environment. In such an environment, the travel decision-making processes of travelers are significantly affected, making it even more difficult to give theoretical explanations for urban day-to-day travel systems. Considering that analyzing urban day-to-day travel patterns in an information environment is of great significance for governing the constantly developing and changing urban travel system and, thus, of great importance for the sustainable development of cities, this paper gives a systematic review of the theoretical research on urban day-to-day travel and its development in an information environment over the past few decades. More specifically, the basic explanation of an information environment for urban day-to-day travel is given first; subsequently, the theoretical development of micro decision-making related to individual day-to-day travelers in an information environment is discussed, and the theoretical development related to changes in urban macro traffic flow, which can be recognized as the aggregation effect formed by individual micro decision-making, is also discussed; in addition, the development of understanding different types of traffic information that travelers may obtain in an information environment is discussed; finally, some important open issues related to the deep impact of information environment on urban day-to-day travel systems that require further research are presented. These valuable research directions include using information methods to fit day-to-day travel patterns of cities and implementing macro and micro integrated modeling for urban day-to-day travel systems based on complex system dynamics and even quantum mechanics.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Nai & Zan Yang & Dan Li & Lu Liu & Yuting Fu & Yuao Guo, 2024. "Urban Day-to-Day Travel and Its Development in an Information Environment: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2572-:d:1360928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cascetta, Ennio, 1989. "A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Fangfang Wei & Shoufeng Ma & Ning Jia, 2014. "A Day-to-Day Route Choice Model Based on Reinforcement Learning," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-19, September.
    3. Terry L. Friesz & David Bernstein & Nihal J. Mehta & Roger L. Tobin & Saiid Ganjalizadeh, 1994. "Day-To-Day Dynamic Network Disequilibria and Idealized Traveler Information Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1120-1136, December.
    4. Sandholm, William H., 2001. "Potential Games with Continuous Player Sets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 81-108, March.
    5. Martin L. Hazelton & David P. Watling, 2004. "Computation of Equilibrium Distributions of Markov Traffic-Assignment Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 331-342, August.
    6. Huang, Hai-Jun & Lam, William H. K., 2002. "Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 253-273, March.
    7. Zhang, Ding & Nagurney, Anna, 1996. "On the local and global stability of a travel route choice adjustment process," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 245-262, August.
    8. Mannering, Fred L., 1989. "Poisson analysis of commuter flexibility in changing routes and departure times," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 53-60, February.
    9. Smith, M. J., 1983. "The existence and calculation of traffic equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 291-303, August.
    10. William H. Sandholm, 2002. "Evolutionary Implementation and Congestion Pricing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(3), pages 667-689.
    11. Iida, Yasunori & Akiyama, Takamasa & Uchida, Takashi, 1992. "Experimental analysis of dynamic route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 17-32, February.
    12. Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2009. "Chaos and bifurcation in dynamical evolution process of traffic assignment with flow “mutation”," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 1150-1157.
    13. Terry L. Friesz & David Bernstein & Roger Stough, 1996. "Dynamic Systems, Variational Inequalities and Control Theoretic Models for Predicting Time-Varying Urban Network Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 14-31, February.
    14. Watling, David, 1999. "Stability of the stochastic equilibrium assignment problem: a dynamical systems approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 281-312, May.
    15. Hall, Randolph W., 1983. "Travel outcome and performance: The effect of uncertainty on accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 275-290, August.
    16. Lipovetsky, Stan, 2018. "Quantum paradigm of probability amplitude and complex utility in entangled discrete choice modeling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 62-73.
    17. Yang, Hai & Meng, Qiang, 1998. "Departure time, route choice and congestion toll in a queuing network with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 247-260, May.
    18. Friesz, Terry L. & Shah, Samir, 2001. "An overview of nontraditional formulations of static and dynamic equilibrium network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 5-21, January.
    19. Michael J. Smith, 1984. "The Stability of a Dynamic Model of Traffic Assignment---An Application of a Method of Lyapunov," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 245-252, August.
    20. Huang, Hai-Jun & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2007. "A multiclass, multicriteria logit-based traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1464-1477, February.
    21. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.
    22. Roger L. Tobin & Terry L. Friesz, 1988. "Sensitivity Analysis for Equilibrium Network Flow," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 242-250, November.
    23. Anna Nagurney & Ding Zhang, 1997. "Projected Dynamical Systems in the Formulation, Stability Analysis, and Computation of Fixed-Demand Traffic Network Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 147-158, May.
    24. Yin, Yafeng & Yang, Hai, 2003. "Simultaneous determination of the equilibrium market penetration and compliance rate of advanced traveler information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 165-181, February.
    25. Han, Xiao & Yu, Yun & Gao, Zi-You & Zhang, H. Michael, 2021. "The value of pre-trip information on departure time and route choice in the morning commute under stochastic traffic conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 205-226.
    26. Stella Dafermos, 1980. "Traffic Equilibrium and Variational Inequalities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 42-54, February.
    27. G. E. Cantarella & E. Cascetta, 1995. "Dynamic Processes and Equilibrium in Transportation Networks: Towards a Unifying Theory," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 305-329, November.
    28. Meneguzzer, Claudio, 2022. "Day-to-day dynamics in a simple traffic network with mixed direct and contrarian route choice behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    29. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2004. "The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-15, January.
    30. Zhu, Zheng & Mardan, Atabak & Zhu, Shanjiang & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Capturing the interaction between travel time reliability and route choice behavior based on the generalized Bayesian traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 48-64.
    31. Mohamed Wahba & Amer Shalaby, 2014. "Learning-based framework for transit assignment modeling under information provision," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 397-417, March.
    32. Smith, M. J., 1979. "The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-304, December.
    33. Yang, Fan & Zhang, Ding, 2009. "Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 119-126, January.
    34. Gary A. Davis & Nancy L. Nihan, 1993. "Large Population Approximations of a General Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 169-178, February.
    35. Bhat, Chandra R. & Sivakumar, Aruna & Axhausen, Kay W., 2003. "An analysis of the impact of information and communication technologies on non-maintenance shopping activities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 857-881, December.
    36. Yang, Hai, 1998. "Multiple equilibrium behaviors and advanced traveler information systems with endogenous market penetration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 205-218, April.
    37. Mounce, Richard, 2006. "Convergence in a continuous dynamic queueing model for traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 779-791, November.
    38. Cho, Hsun-Jung & Smith, Tony E. & Friesz, Terry L., 2000. "A reduction method for local sensitivity analyses of network equilibrium arc flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-51, January.
    39. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    40. Malachy Carey & Ashok Srinivasan, 1993. "Externalities, Average and Marginal Costs, and Tolls on Congested Networks with Time-Varying Flows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 217-231, February.
    41. Michael Patriksson & R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis of Aggregated Variational Inequality Problems, with Application to Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 56-68, February.
    42. Hani S. Mahmassani & Gang-Len Chang & Robert Herman, 1986. "Individual Decisions and Collective Effects in a Simulated Traffic System," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 258-271, November.
    43. Michael Patriksson, 2004. "Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 258-281, August.
    44. Horowitz, Joel L., 1984. "The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 13-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Ren-Yong & Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun & Tan, Zhijia, 2015. "Link-based day-to-day network traffic dynamics and equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 248-260.
    2. Wang, Jian & He, Xiaozheng & Peeta, Srinivas, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis based approximation models for day-to-day link flow evolution process," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 35-53.
    3. He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2010. "A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 597-608, May.
    4. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang & Zhijia Tan, 2016. "Day-to-Day Flow Dynamics and Congestion Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 982-997, August.
    5. Sun, Mingmei, 2023. "A day-to-day dynamic model for mixed traffic flow of autonomous vehicles and inertial human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Kumar, Amit & Peeta, Srinivas, 2015. "A day-to-day dynamical model for the evolution of path flows under disequilibrium of traffic networks with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 235-256.
    7. Han, Linghui & Wang, David Z.W. & Lo, Hong K. & Zhu, Chengjuan & Cai, Xingju, 2017. "Discrete-time day-to-day dynamic congestion pricing scheme considering multiple equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Lie Han, 2022. "Proportional-Switch Adjustment Process with Elastic Demand and Congestion Toll in the Absence of Demand Functions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 709-735, December.
    9. G. E. Cantarella & D. P. Watling, 2016. "Modelling road traffic assignment as a day-to-day dynamic, deterministic process: a unified approach to discrete- and continuous-time models," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 69-98, March.
    10. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    11. Liu, Peng & Liao, Feixiong & Tian, Qiong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Timmermans, Harry, 2020. "Day-to-day needs-based activity-travel dynamics and equilibria in multi-state supernetworks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 208-227.
    12. Bie, Jing & Lo, Hong K., 2010. "Stability and attraction domains of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamical system formulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 90-107, January.
    13. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai-Jun Huang & Hai Yang, 2019. "Tradable Credit Scheme for Control of Evolutionary Traffic Flows to System Optimum: Model and its Convergence," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 833-868, September.
    14. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang, 2018. "Are We Really Solving the Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Problem with a Departure Time Choice?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 603-620, June.
    15. Feng Xiao & Minyu Shen & Zhengtian Xu & Ruijie Li & Hai Yang & Yafeng Yin, 2019. "Day-to-Day Flow Dynamics for Stochastic User Equilibrium and a General Lyapunov Function," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 683-694, May.
    16. Yang, Fan & Zhang, Ding, 2009. "Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 119-126, January.
    17. Peeta, Srinivas, 2016. "A marginal utility day-to-day traffic evolution model based on one-step strategic thinkingAuthor-Name: He, Xiaozheng," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 237-255.
    18. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    19. Xiaomei Zhao & Chunhua Wan & Jun Bi, 2019. "Day-to-Day Assignment Models and Traffic Dynamics Under Information Provision," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 473-502, June.
    20. Watling, David, 1999. "Stability of the stochastic equilibrium assignment problem: a dynamical systems approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 281-312, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2572-:d:1360928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.