IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i1d10.1007_s10198-023-01570-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canada population norms for the EQ-5D-5L

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajun Yan

    (McMaster University)

  • Shitong Xie

    (McMaster University
    Tianjin University)

  • Jeffrey A. Johnson

    (University of Alberta)

  • Eleanor Pullenayegum

    (The Hospital for Sick Children
    The University of Toronto)

  • Arto Ohinmaa

    (University of Alberta)

  • Stirling Bryan

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Feng Xie

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

Objective In Canada, population norms are only available for 2 provinces, Alberta and Quebec. The objective of this study was to derive the population norms for the EQ-5D-5L based on a representative sample of the Canadian general population. Methods Data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study, a cross-sectional study, were used. A quota sampling method was used to recruit a representative sample of the Canadian general population in terms of age, sex, and education. EQ-5D-5L utilities and EQ VAS were summarized using descriptive statistics and the impact of demographic characteristics on the EQ-5D-5L utilities was evaluated using statistical hypothesis testing and Tobit regression. Results 1207 eligible participants were included in the analysis. Pain/discomfort (53.1%) was the most frequently reported domain with any problem, and self-care (7.6%) domain was the least. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) EQ-5D-5L utility was 0.864 (0.121) and the mean (SD) EQ VAS was 82.3 (14.23). The highest mean EQ-5D-5L utility was 0.881 in age group 25–34 while the lowest was 0.839 in age group 55–64. Participants who had full-time employment, were married, a higher annual household income and no chronic health conditions had significantly higher EQ-5D-5L utilities. Conclusion This article reports the first Canadian population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and can be used as population references for economic evaluations and clinical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajun Yan & Shitong Xie & Jeffrey A. Johnson & Eleanor Pullenayegum & Arto Ohinmaa & Stirling Bryan & Feng Xie, 2024. "Canada population norms for the EQ-5D-5L," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 147-155, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01570-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01570-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01570-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01570-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Kennedy-Martin & Bernhard Slaap & Michael Herdman & Mandy Reenen & Tessa Kennedy-Martin & Wolfgang Greiner & Jan Busschbach & Kristina S. Boye, 2020. "Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(8), pages 1245-1257, November.
    2. Yee, Thomas W., 2010. "The VGAM Package for Categorical Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i10).
    3. Chong-Hwan Son, 2020. "The Effects of Retirement on Health-Related Quality of Life of Retirement-Aged Adults for Four Marital Status Subgroups," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 179-201, June.
    4. Fredrick Dermawan Purba & Joke A M Hunfeld & Aulia Iskandarsyah & Titi Sahidah Fitriana & Sawitri S Sadarjoen & Jan Passchier & Jan J V Busschbach, 2018. "Quality of life of the Indonesian general population: Test-retest reliability and population norms of the EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-BREF," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Yee, Thomas W. & Stoklosa, Jakub & Huggins, Richard M., 2015. "The VGAM Package for Capture-Recapture Data Using the Conditional Likelihood," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i05).
    6. Shitong Xie & Jing Wu & Feng Xie, 2022. "Population Norms for SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in China," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 573-585, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karavarsamis, N. & Huggins, R.M., 2019. "Two-stage approaches to the analysis of occupancy data II. The heterogeneous model and conditional likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 195-207.
    2. D'Alberto, R. & Targetti, S. & Schaller, L. & Bartolini, F. & Eichhorn, T. & Haltia, E. & Harmanny, K. & Le Gloux, F. & Nikolov, D. & Runge, T. & Vergamini, D. & Viaggi, D., 2024. "A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Kamilla Koszorú & Krisztina Hajdu & Valentin Brodszky & Alex Bató & L. Hunor Gergely & Anikó Kovács & Zsuzsanna Beretzky & Miklós Sárdy & Andrea Szegedi & Fanni Rencz, 2023. "Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L descriptive systems and utilities in atopic dermatitis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 139-152, February.
    4. Kaza, Nikhil & Towe, Charles A. & Ye, Xin, 2011. "A Hybrid Land Conversion Model Incorporating Multiple End Uses," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Umlauf, Nikolaus & Adler, Daniel & Kneib, Thomas & Lang, Stefan & Zeileis, Achim, 2015. "Structured Additive Regression Models: An R Interface to BayesX," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i21).
    6. Jiang, Xianfeng & Packer, Frank, 2019. "Credit ratings of Chinese firms by domestic and global agencies: Assessing the determinants and impact," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 178-193.
    7. Xi Liu & Yiqiao Jin & Yifan Yang & Xiaoqing Pan, 2023. "Properties and Estimations of a Multivariate Folded Normal Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Mattia Filomena & Matteo Picchio, 2023. "Retirement and health outcomes in a meta‐analytical framework," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1120-1155, September.
    9. Carolyn Anderson, 2013. "Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models with Collateral Information as Poisson Regression Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(2), pages 276-303, July.
    10. Jaeil Ahn & Bhramar Mukherjee & Stephen B. Gruber & Samiran Sinha, 2011. "Missing Exposure Data in Stereotype Regression Model: Application to Matched Case–Control Study with Disease Subclassification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 546-558, June.
    11. Michail Tsagris & Christina Beneki & Hossein Hassani, 2014. "On the Folded Normal Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Shuai Shao & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Understanding price elasticity for airline ancillary services," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 74-82, February.
    13. Jen-Yu Amy Chang & Chien-Ning Hsu & Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi & Nan Luo & Hsiang-Wen Lin & Fang-Ju Lin, 2024. "Beyond 10-year lead-times in EQ-5D-5L: leveraging alternative lead-times in willingness-to-accept questions to capture preferences for worse-than-dead states and their implication," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 1041-1055, August.
    14. Richard Huan Xu & Eliza Lai-yi Wong & Nan Luo & Richard Norman & Jens Lehmann & Bernhard Holzner & Madeleine T. King & Georg Kemmler, 2024. "The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Hong Kong valuation study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(5), pages 889-901, July.
    15. Shin Ji-Hyung & Infante-Rivard Claire & McNeney Brad & Graham Jinko, 2014. "A data-smoothing approach to explore and test gene-environment interaction in case-parent trios," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 159-171, April.
    16. Thomas Yee & Alfian Hadi, 2014. "Row–column interaction models, with an R implementation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1427-1445, December.
    17. Ioannis Kontoyiannis & Lambros Mertzanis & Athina Panotopoulou & Ioannis Papageorgiou & Maria Skoularidou, 2022. "Bayesian context trees: Modelling and exact inference for discrete time series," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1287-1323, September.
    18. Tutz, G. & Berger, M., 2017. "Separating location and dispersion in ordinal regression models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 131-148.
    19. Mahdi Rezapour & Khaled Ksaibati, 2022. "Identification of factors associated with various types of impaired driving," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Michał Jakubczyk & Michał Lewandowski, 2024. "How sure are you? — the properties of self-reported conviction in the elicitation of health preferences with discrete choice experiments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 351-368, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01570-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.