IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-024-00748-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of similarity heuristics on evaluation deviation: Evidence from an online crowdsourced Q&A healthcare platform

Author

Listed:
  • Yifan He

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Min Zhang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Tianshi Wu

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Xitong Guo

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Doug Vogel

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Crowdsourced question-and-answer (Q&A) services on online healthcare platforms provide a wide range of information for patients. Owing to information asymmetry, evaluating healthcare providers’ services often leads to skewed decision-making, but it remains unclear whether heuristic cues play a role. Considering potential heuristic information processing, we explore the existence of patient evaluation deviation in a crowdsourced context and how it is affected by the similarity among the physicians’ answer text, the question, and the first answer text. Data were collected from 1,074,885 answer records on a leading Chinese online crowdsourced Q&A healthcare platform. Our findings show that the text similarity of questions and answers in physician‒patient interactions, as well as of first and subsequent answers, increases the evaluation deviation of online physicians’ consultations (specifically, increasing patient underestimation and reducing patient overestimation). Moreover, the information differentiation of all answers to the same question has a negative moderating effect on the above relationship. The results of this study provide empirical evidence regarding the factors that influence online evaluation deviation in crowdsourced Q&A services and suggestions for strategies for different stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifan He & Min Zhang & Tianshi Wu & Xitong Guo & Doug Vogel, 2025. "The influence of similarity heuristics on evaluation deviation: Evidence from an online crowdsourced Q&A healthcare platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00748-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00748-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-024-00748-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-024-00748-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanli Zhang & Xinmiao Li & Weiguo Fan, 2020. "User adoption of physician's replies in an online health community: An empirical study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1179-1191, October.
    2. Hu, Xin & He, Liuyi & Liu, Junjun, 2022. "Status reinforcing: Unintended rating bias on online shopping platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Chen Chen & Dylan Walker, 2023. "A Bitter Pill to Swallow? The Consequences of Patient Evaluation in Online Health Question-and-Answer Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 867-889, September.
    4. Yongqiang Sun & Nan Wang & Xiao‐Liang Shen & Xi Zhang, 2019. "Bias effects, synergistic effects, and information contingency effects: Developing and testing an extended information adoption model in social Q&A," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(12), pages 1368-1382, December.
    5. Linlin Jing & Wei Shan & Richard David Evans & Xiaoxiao Shi, 2024. "Getting to know my disease better: The influence of linguistic features of patients’ self-disclosure on physicians’ social support in online health consultation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Kuan-Min Wang & Yuan-Ming Lee, 2018. "The impacts of life insurance asymmetrically on health expenditure and economic growth: dynamic panel threshold approach," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 440-460, January.
    7. Wei Zhao & Qianqian Ben Liu & Xitong Guo & Tianshi Wu & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Quid pro quo in online medical consultation? Investigating the effects of small monetary gifts from patients," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1698-1718, April.
    8. Petersen, Alan & Schermuly, Allegra & Anderson, Alison, 2022. "‘A platform for goodness, not for badness’: The heuristics of hope in patients' evaluations of online health information," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    9. Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2016. "Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 131-144, March.
    10. Yuqian Xu & Mor Armony & Anindya Ghose, 2021. "The Interplay Between Online Reviews and Physician Demand: An Empirical Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7344-7361, December.
    11. Verma, Deepak & Prakash Dewani, Prem & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Dwivedi, Yogesh & Del Giudice, Manilo, 2023. "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of eWOM credibility: Investigation of moderating role of culture and platform type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Wenjuan Fan & Qiqi Zhou & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2023. "Should Doctors Open Online Consultation Services? An Empirical Investigation of Their Impact on Offline Appointments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 629-651, June.
    13. Furnham, Adrian & Boo, Hua Chu, 2011. "A literature review of the anchoring effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-42, February.
    14. Qian Wang & Michael Chau & Chih-Hung Peng & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2022. "Using the Anchoring Effect and the Cultural Dimensions Theory to Study Customers’ Online Rating Behaviors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1451-1463, October.
    15. Peter Gordon Roetzel, 2019. "Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework developmen," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 479-522, December.
    16. Book, Laura A. & Tanford, Sarah & Chang, Wen, 2018. "Customer reviews are not always informative: The impact of effortful versus heuristic processing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 272-280.
    17. Jingchuan Pu & Yuan Chen & Liangfei Qiu & Hsing Kenneth Cheng, 2020. "Does Identity Disclosure Help or Hurt User Content Generation? Social Presence, Inhibition, and Displacement Effects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 297-322, June.
    18. Diwas Singh KC, 2020. "Heuristic Thinking in Patient Care," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2545-2563, June.
    19. Chih-Hung Peng & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2020. "More than Words in Medical Question-and-Answer Sites: A Content-Context Congruence Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 913-928, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingfeng Zeng & Wei Zhuang & Qian Guo & Weiguo Fan, 2022. "What factors influence grassroots knowledge supplier performance in online knowledge platforms? Evidence from a paid Q&A service," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2507-2523, December.
    2. Qili Wang & Liangfei Qiu & Wei Xu, 2024. "Informal Payments and Doctor Engagement in an Online Health Community: An Empirical Investigation Using Generalized Synthetic Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 706-726, June.
    3. Jingchuan Pu & Yang Liu & Yuan Chen & Liangfei Qiu & Hsing Kenneth Cheng, 2022. "What Questions Are You Inclined to Answer? Effects of Hierarchy in Corporate Q&A Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 244-264, March.
    4. Qian Wang & Michael Chau & Chih-Hung Peng & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2022. "Using the Anchoring Effect and the Cultural Dimensions Theory to Study Customers’ Online Rating Behaviors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1451-1463, October.
    5. Dezhi Yin & Triparna de Vreede & Logan M. Steele & Gert-Jan de Vreede, 2023. "Decide Now or Later: Making Sense of Incoherence Across Online Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1211-1227, September.
    6. Bo Li & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Managing Software‐as‐a‐Service: Pricing and operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2588-2608, June.
    7. Wang, Ziwei & Chen, Hongmin & Luo, Jun & Wang, Chunming & Xu, Xinyi & Zhou, Ying, 2024. "Sharing service in healthcare systems: A recent survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    9. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    10. Siddiqi, Hammad, 2015. "Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: A Unified Explanation for Equity Puzzles," MPRA Paper 68729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Yi Yang & Kunpeng Zhang & Yangyang Fan, 2023. "sDTM: A Supervised Bayesian Deep Topic Model for Text Analytics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-156, March.
    12. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    13. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Seres, Gyula, 2021. "Are strategies anchored?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. He Tingting, 2021. "Comparing Money and Time Donation: What Do Experiments Tell Us?," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 65-94, September.
    15. Sang-June Park & Youjae Yi, 2016. "Performance-only measures vs. performance-expectation measures of service quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15-16), pages 741-756, December.
    16. Fan Zou & Yupeng Li & Jiahuan Huang, 2022. "Group interaction and evolution of customer reviews based on opinion dynamics towards product redesign," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1131-1151, December.
    17. Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Tonghui & Mao, Zhixin, 2022. "How online reviews and coupons affect sales and pricing: An empirical study based on e-commerce platform," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Edwards, Chase J. & Bendickson, Joshua S. & Baker, Brent L. & Solomon, Shelby J., 2020. "Entrepreneurship within the history of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 259-267.
    19. Zhaohua Deng & Guorui Fan & Zihao Deng & Bin Wang, 2024. "Why Doctors Participate in Teams of Online Health Communities? A Social Identity and Brand Resource Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1915-1941, October.
    20. Christian Koch, 2021. "Can reference points explain wage rigidity? Experimental evidence," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 55(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crowdsourced Q&A; Evaluation deviation; Similarity heuristic; Question-and-answer similarity; First answer similarity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00748-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.