IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v24y2024i4d10.1007_s10660-022-09617-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What affects patients’ choice of consultant: an empirical study of online doctor consultation service

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Huang

    (Central China Normal University)

  • Pu Sun

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xiaofei Zhang

    (Nankai University)

  • Jiang Wu

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

As a new type of online health communities (OHC), online doctor consultation services (ODCS) enable doctors deliver healthcare consulting to patients virtually. Patients can use both online information, such as online reviews, and offline attributes, such as position rank, to choose the consultant. This study uses a comprehensive model to investigate the influence of online Word-of-Mouth (online WOM) indicated by online information and quality of healthcare service reflected by offline attributes on the sales amount of doctor consultations. A panel dataset of 11,163 records from the biggest ODCS platform in China is used for empirical analysis. Results show that valence and volume of online review, the number of domain votes, recommend value, and position rank of consultant have positive effects on patients’ choice of consultant. The effect of hospital level where the consultant works at is insignificant. The moderating effect between consultant’s online recommend value and offline position rank is negative so that the consultant’s position rank becomes less important if a consultant’s recommend value is high and vice versa. Furthermore, the results also reveal that price has a negative impact on patients’ demand of healthcare consulting and patients with high-risk disease are less sensitive to it. This study contributes to the existing literature by uncovering the factors that influence patients’ choice of consultant and providing practical implications for doctors and system designers in ODCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Huang & Pu Sun & Xiaofei Zhang & Jiang Wu, 2024. "What affects patients’ choice of consultant: an empirical study of online doctor consultation service," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2903-2925, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09617-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-022-09617-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-022-09617-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-022-09617-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09617-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.