IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v70y2018i3d10.1007_s10589-018-9994-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A class of ADMM-based algorithms for three-block separable convex programming

Author

Listed:
  • Bingsheng He

    (Southern University of Science and Technology
    Nanjing University)

  • Xiaoming Yuan

    (The University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) recently has found many applications in various domains whose models can be represented or reformulated as a separable convex minimization model with linear constraints and an objective function in sum of two functions without coupled variables. For more complicated applications that can only be represented by such a multi-block separable convex minimization model whose objective function is the sum of more than two functions without coupled variables, it was recently shown that the direct extension of ADMM is not necessarily convergent. On the other hand, despite the lack of convergence, the direct extension of ADMM is empirically efficient for many applications. Thus we are interested in such an algorithm that can be implemented as easily as the direct extension of ADMM, while with comparable or even better numerical performance and guaranteed convergence. In this paper, we suggest correcting the output of the direct extension of ADMM slightly by a simple correction step. The correction step is simple in the sense that it is completely free from step-size computing and its step size is bounded away from zero for any iterate. A prototype algorithm in this prediction-correction framework is proposed; and a unified and easily checkable condition to ensure the convergence of this prototype algorithm is given. Theoretically, we show the contraction property, prove the global convergence and establish the worst-case convergence rate measured by the iteration complexity for this prototype algorithm. The analysis is conducted in the variational inequality context. Then, based on this prototype algorithm, we propose a class of specific ADMM-based algorithms that can be used for three-block separable convex minimization models. Their numerical efficiency is verified by an image decomposition problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingsheng He & Xiaoming Yuan, 2018. "A class of ADMM-based algorithms for three-block separable convex programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 791-826, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-018-9994-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-018-9994-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-018-9994-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-018-9994-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bingsheng He & Min Tao & Xiaoming Yuan, 2017. "Convergence Rate Analysis for the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers with a Substitution Procedure for Separable Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 662-691, August.
    2. R. T. Rockafellar, 1976. "Augmented Lagrangians and Applications of the Proximal Point Algorithm in Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 97-116, May.
    3. Deren Han & Xiaoming Yuan, 2012. "A Note on the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 227-238, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Ma, 2019. "On relaxation of some customized proximal point algorithms for convex minimization: from variational inequality perspective," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 871-901, July.
    2. Jianchao Bai & William W. Hager & Hongchao Zhang, 2022. "An inexact accelerated stochastic ADMM for separable convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 479-518, March.
    3. Yaning Jiang & Deren Han & Xingju Cai, 2022. "An efficient partial parallel method with scaling step size strategy for three-block convex optimization problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(3), pages 383-419, December.
    4. Shengjie Xu & Bingsheng He, 2021. "A parallel splitting ALM-based algorithm for separable convex programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 831-851, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingsheng He & Min Tao & Xiaoming Yuan, 2017. "Convergence Rate Analysis for the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers with a Substitution Procedure for Separable Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 662-691, August.
    2. Hongsheng Liu & Shu Lu, 2019. "Convergence of the augmented decomposition algorithm," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 179-213, January.
    3. Yangyang Xu, 2019. "Asynchronous parallel primal–dual block coordinate update methods for affinely constrained convex programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 87-113, January.
    4. Ruoyu Sun & Zhi-Quan Luo & Yinyu Ye, 2020. "On the Efficiency of Random Permutation for ADMM and Coordinate Descent," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 233-271, February.
    5. Yaning Jiang & Deren Han & Xingju Cai, 2022. "An efficient partial parallel method with scaling step size strategy for three-block convex optimization problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(3), pages 383-419, December.
    6. K. Wang & D. R. Han & L. L. Xu, 2013. "A Parallel Splitting Method for Separable Convex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 138-158, October.
    7. Jean-Pierre Crouzeix & Abdelhak Hassouni & Eladio Ocaña, 2023. "A Short Note on the Twice Differentiability of the Marginal Function of a Convex Function," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 857-867, August.
    8. Puya Latafat & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2017. "Asymmetric forward–backward–adjoint splitting for solving monotone inclusions involving three operators," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 57-93, September.
    9. Bingsheng He & Li-Zhi Liao & Xiang Wang, 2012. "Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework I: Effective quadruplet and primary methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 649-679, March.
    10. Xiaoming Yuan, 2011. "An improved proximal alternating direction method for monotone variational inequalities with separable structure," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 17-29, May.
    11. Zhu, Daoli & Marcotte, Patrice, 1995. "Coupling the auxiliary problem principle with descent methods of pseudoconvex programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 670-685, June.
    12. Guo, Zhaomiao & Fan, Yueyue, 2017. "A Stochastic Multi-Agent Optimization Model for Energy Infrastructure Planning Under Uncertainty and Competition," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt89s5s8hn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Peixuan Li & Yuan Shen & Suhong Jiang & Zehua Liu & Caihua Chen, 2021. "Convergence study on strictly contractive Peaceman–Rachford splitting method for nonseparable convex minimization models with quadratic coupling terms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 87-124, January.
    14. Yao, Yu & Zhu, Xiaoning & Dong, Hongyu & Wu, Shengnan & Wu, Hailong & Carol Tong, Lu & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "ADMM-based problem decomposition scheme for vehicle routing problem with time windows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 156-174.
    15. R. S. Burachik & S. Scheimberg & B. F. Svaiter, 2001. "Robustness of the Hybrid Extragradient Proximal-Point Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 117-136, October.
    16. A. F. Izmailov & M. V. Solodov, 2022. "Perturbed Augmented Lagrangian Method Framework with Applications to Proximal and Smoothed Variants," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 491-522, June.
    17. M. Kyono & M. Fukushima, 2000. "Nonlinear Proximal Decomposition Method for Convex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 357-372, August.
    18. Ya-Feng Liu & Xin Liu & Shiqian Ma, 2019. "On the Nonergodic Convergence Rate of an Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Composite Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 632-650, May.
    19. J. R. Birge & L. Qi & Z. Wei, 1998. "Convergence Analysis of Some Methods for Minimizing a Nonsmooth Convex Function," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 357-383, May.
    20. Liusheng Hou & Hongjin He & Junfeng Yang, 2016. "A partially parallel splitting method for multiple-block separable convex programming with applications to robust PCA," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 273-303, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-018-9994-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.