IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aqjoor/v15y2017i4d10.1007_s10288-016-0336-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating column generation in a method to compute a discrete representation of the non-dominated set of multi-objective linear programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Kuan-Min Lin

    (Lancaster University)

  • Matthias Ehrgott

    (Lancaster University)

  • Andrea Raith

    (The University of Auckland)

Abstract

In this paper we propose the integration of column generation in the revised normal boundary intersection (RNBI) approach to compute a representative set of non-dominated points for multi-objective linear programmes (MOLPs). The RNBI approach solves single objective linear programmes, the RNBI subproblems, to project a set of evenly distributed reference points to the non-dominated set of an MOLP. We solve each RNBI subproblem using column generation, which moves the current point in objective space of the MOLP towards the non-dominated set. Since RNBI subproblems may be infeasible, we attempt to detect this infeasibility early. First, a reference point bounding method is proposed to eliminate reference points that lead to infeasible RNBI subproblems. Furthermore, different initialisation approaches for column generation are implemented, including Farkas pricing. We investigate the quality of the representation obtained. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach, we apply it to an MOLP arising in radiotherapy treatment design. In contrast to conventional optimisation approaches, treatment design using column generation provides deliverable treatment plans, avoiding a segmentation step which deteriorates treatment quality. As a result total monitor units is considerably reduced. We also note that reference point bounding dramatically reduces the number of RNBI subproblems that need to be solved.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuan-Min Lin & Matthias Ehrgott & Andrea Raith, 2017. "Integrating column generation in a method to compute a discrete representation of the non-dominated set of multi-objective linear programmes," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 331-357, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10288-016-0336-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10288-016-0336-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10288-016-0336-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10288-016-0336-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Lizhen & Ehrgott, Matthias, 2016. "Discrete representation of non-dominated sets in multi-objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 687-698.
    2. Moradi, Siamak & Raith, Andrea & Ehrgott, Matthias, 2015. "A bi-objective column generation algorithm for the multi-commodity minimum cost flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 369-378.
    3. Fredrik Carlsson & Anders Forsgren, 2014. "On column generation approaches for approximate solutions of quadratic programs in intensity-modulated radiation therapy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 471-481, December.
    4. Gijs Rennen & Edwin R. van Dam & Dick den Hertog, 2011. "Enhancement of Sandwich Algorithms for Approximating Higher-Dimensional Convex Pareto Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 493-517, November.
    5. Rasmus Bokrantz & Anders Forsgren, 2013. "An Algorithm for Approximating Convex Pareto Surfaces Based on Dual Techniques," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 377-393, May.
    6. Lizhen Shao & Matthias Ehrgott, 2008. "Approximately solving multiobjective linear programmes in objective space and an application in radiotherapy treatment planning," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(2), pages 257-276, October.
    7. Harold P. Benson & Serpil Sayin, 1997. "Towards finding global representations of the efficient set in multiple objective mathematical programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 47-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daş, Gülesin Sena & Gzara, Fatma & Stützle, Thomas, 2020. "A review on airport gate assignment problems: Single versus multi objective approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Breedveld, Sebastiaan & Craft, David & van Haveren, Rens & Heijmen, Ben, 2019. "Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 1-19.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Tim Craig & Taewoo Lee & Michael B. Sharpe, 2014. "Generalized Inverse Multiobjective Optimization with Application to Cancer Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 680-695, June.
    2. Raimundo, Marcos M. & Ferreira, Paulo A.V. & Von Zuben, Fernando J., 2020. "An extension of the non-inferior set estimation algorithm for many objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 53-66.
    3. Breedveld, Sebastiaan & Craft, David & van Haveren, Rens & Heijmen, Ben, 2019. "Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 1-19.
    4. Koenen, Melissa & Balvert, Marleen & Fleuren, H.A., 2023. "A Renewed Take on Weighted Sum in Sandwich Algorithms : Modification of the Criterion Space," Discussion Paper 2023-012, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Koenen, Melissa & Balvert, Marleen & Fleuren, H.A., 2023. "A Renewed Take on Weighted Sum in Sandwich Algorithms : Modification of the Criterion Space," Other publications TiSEM 795b6c0c-c7bc-4ced-9d6b-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. E. Filatovas & O. Kurasova & J. L. Redondo & J. Fernández, 2020. "A reference point-based evolutionary algorithm for approximating regions of interest in multiobjective problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 402-423, July.
    7. de Freitas, Juliana Campos & Cantane, Daniela Renata & Rocha, Humberto & Dias, Joana, 2024. "A multiobjective beam angle optimization framework for intensity-modulated radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 286-296.
    8. Hela Masri & Saoussen Krichen, 2018. "Exact and approximate approaches for the Pareto front generation of the single path multicommodity flow problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 353-377, August.
    9. Rennen, G. & van Dam, E.R. & den Hertog, D., 2009. "Enhancement of Sandwich Algorithms for Approximating Higher Dimensional Convex Pareto Sets," Other publications TiSEM e2255959-6691-4ef1-88a4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Fereshteh Akbari & Mehrdad Ghaznavi & Esmaile Khorram, 2018. "A Revised Pascoletti–Serafini Scalarization Method for Multiobjective Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 560-590, August.
    11. Andreas Löhne & Birgit Rudloff & Firdevs Ulus, 2014. "Primal and dual approximation algorithms for convex vector optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 713-736, December.
    12. Serpil Sayin, 2003. "A Procedure to Find Discrete Representations of the Efficient Set with Specified Coverage Errors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 427-436, June.
    13. Xie, Chi & Travis Waller, S., 2012. "Parametric search and problem decomposition for approximating Pareto-optimal paths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1043-1067.
    14. Gijs Rennen & Edwin R. van Dam & Dick den Hertog, 2011. "Enhancement of Sandwich Algorithms for Approximating Higher-Dimensional Convex Pareto Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 493-517, November.
    15. Löhne, Andreas & Weißing, Benjamin, 2017. "The vector linear program solver Bensolve – notes on theoretical background," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 807-813.
    16. Angelo Aliano Filho & Antonio Carlos Moretti & Margarida Vaz Pato & Washington Alves Oliveira, 2021. "An exact scalarization method with multiple reference points for bi-objective integer linear optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 35-69, January.
    17. Matthias Ehrgott & Andreas Löhne & Lizhen Shao, 2012. "A dual variant of Benson’s “outer approximation algorithm” for multiple objective linear programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 757-778, April.
    18. Janusz Miroforidis, 2021. "Bounds on efficient outcomes for large-scale cardinality-constrained Markowitz problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 617-634, July.
    19. Gorissen, B.L. & den Hertog, D., 2012. "Approximating the Pareto Set of Multiobjective Linear Programs via Robust Optimization," Other publications TiSEM 666c5307-4a4e-4be4-a0d0-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2024. "Deep learning the efficient frontier of convex vector optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 429-458, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10288-016-0336-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.