IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v296y2021i1d10.1007_s10479-019-03317-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact scalarization method with multiple reference points for bi-objective integer linear optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Aliano Filho

    (Federal Technological University of Paraná)

  • Antonio Carlos Moretti

    (University of Campinas)

  • Margarida Vaz Pato

    (Universidade de Lisboa)

  • Washington Alves Oliveira

    (University of Campinas)

Abstract

This paper presents an exact scalarization method to solve bi-objective integer linear optimization problems. This method uses diverse reference points in the iterations, and it is free from any kind of a priori chosen weighting factors. In addition, two new adapted scalarization methods from literature and the modified Tchebycheff method are studied. Each one of them results in different ways to obtain the Pareto frontier. Computational experiments were performed with random real size instances of two special problems related to the manufacturing industry, which involve lot sizing and cutting stock problems. Extensive tests confirmed the very good performance of the new scalarization method with respect to the computational effort, the number of achieved solutions, the ability to achieve different solutions, and the spreading and spacing of solutions at the Pareto frontier.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Aliano Filho & Antonio Carlos Moretti & Margarida Vaz Pato & Washington Alves Oliveira, 2021. "An exact scalarization method with multiple reference points for bi-objective integer linear optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 35-69, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:296:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03317-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03317-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03317-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03317-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Lizhen & Ehrgott, Matthias, 2016. "Discrete representation of non-dominated sets in multi-objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 687-698.
    2. Bérubé, Jean-François & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2009. "An exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 39-50, April.
    3. Serpil Say{i}n & Panos Kouvelis, 2005. "The Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problem: A Weighted Min-Max Two-Stage Optimization Approach and a Bicriteria Algorithm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1572-1581, October.
    4. P. C. Gilmore & R. E. Gomory, 1961. "A Linear Programming Approach to the Cutting-Stock Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 849-859, December.
    5. Luque, Mariano & Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco, 2009. "Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 450-462, April.
    6. S. Ruzika & M. M. Wiecek, 2005. "Approximation Methods in Multiobjective Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 473-501, September.
    7. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2007. "A lexicographic approach to bi-objective scheduling of single-period orders in make-to-order manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1060-1075, August.
    8. Ustun, Ozden & DemI[dot above]rtas, Ezgi Aktar, 2008. "An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 509-521, August.
    9. Przybylski Anthony & Gandibleux Xavier & Matthias Ehrgott, 2009. "Computational Results for Four Exact Methods to Solve the Three-Objective Assignment Problem," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Vincent Barichard & Matthias Ehrgott & Xavier Gandibleux & Vincent T'Kindt (ed.), Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming, pages 79-88, Springer.
    10. Ted Ralphs & Matthew Saltzman & Margaret Wiecek, 2006. "An improved algorithm for solving biobjective integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 43-70, October.
    11. Klein, Dieter & Hannan, Edward, 1982. "An algorithm for the multiple objective integer linear programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 378-385, April.
    12. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    13. Angelo Aliano Filho & António Carlos Moretti & Margarida Vaz Pato, 2018. "A comparative study of exact methods for the bi-objective integer one-dimensional cutting stock problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 91-107, January.
    14. Fatma Zohra Ouaïl & Mohamed El-Amine Chergui, 2018. "A branch-and-cut technique to solve multiobjective integer quadratic programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 431-446, August.
    15. Molina, Julin & Santana, Luis V. & Hernandez-Daz, Alfredo G. & Coello Coello, Carlos A. & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "g-dominance: Reference point based dominance for multiobjective metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 685-692, September.
    16. P. C. Gilmore & R. E. Gomory, 1963. "A Linear Programming Approach to the Cutting Stock Problem---Part II," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 863-888, December.
    17. Kaisa Miettinen & Petri Eskelinen & Mariano Luque & Francisco Ruiz, 2009. "On the Use of Preferential Weights in Interactive Reference Point Based Methods," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Vincent Barichard & Matthias Ehrgott & Xavier Gandibleux & Vincent T'Kindt (ed.), Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming, pages 211-220, Springer.
    18. Rafael Lazimy, 2013. "Interactive Polyhedral Outer Approximation (IPOA) strategy for general multiobjective optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 73-99, November.
    19. Gau, T. & Wascher, G., 1995. "CUTGEN1: A problem generator for the standard one-dimensional cutting stock problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 572-579, August.
    20. Özlen, Melih & Azizoglu, Meral, 2009. "Multi-objective integer programming: A general approach for generating all non-dominated solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 25-35, November.
    21. Ben-Daya, M. & Darwish, M. & Ertogral, K., 2008. "The joint economic lot sizing problem: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 726-742, March.
    22. Karimi, B. & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. & Wilson, J. M., 2003. "The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 365-378, October.
    23. Sylva, John & Crema, Alejandro, 2004. "A method for finding the set of non-dominated vectors for multiple objective integer linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 46-55, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda O. C. Ayres & Betania S. C. Campello & Washington A. Oliveira & Carla T. L. S. Ghidini, 2021. "A Bi-Integrated Model for coupling lot-sizing and cutting-stock problems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(4), pages 1047-1076, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    2. Kerstin Dächert & Kathrin Klamroth, 2015. "A linear bound on the number of scalarizations needed to solve discrete tricriteria optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 643-676, April.
    3. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    4. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    5. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Dinçer Konur & Hadi Farhangi & Cihan H. Dagli, 2016. "A multi-objective military system of systems architecting problem with inflexible and flexible systems: formulation and solution methods," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 967-1006, October.
    7. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.
    8. Nathan Adelgren & Akshay Gupte, 2022. "Branch-and-Bound for Biobjective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 909-933, March.
    9. Tolga Bektaş, 2018. "Disjunctive Programming for Multiobjective Discrete Optimisation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 625-633, November.
    10. Natashia Boland & Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh, 2015. "A Criterion Space Search Algorithm for Biobjective Integer Programming: The Balanced Box Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 735-754, November.
    11. Melih Ozlen & Benjamin A. Burton & Cameron A. G. MacRae, 2014. "Multi-Objective Integer Programming: An Improved Recursive Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 470-482, February.
    12. Jesús Sáez-Aguado & Paula Camelia Trandafir, 2018. "Variants of the $$ \varepsilon $$ ε -constraint method for biobjective integer programming problems: application to p-median-cover problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 251-283, April.
    13. Dächert, Kerstin & Klamroth, Kathrin & Lacour, Renaud & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2017. "Efficient computation of the search region in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 841-855.
    14. Silva, Eduardo M. & Melega, Gislaine M. & Akartunalı, Kerem & de Araujo, Silvio A., 2023. "Formulations and theoretical analysis of the one-dimensional multi-period cutting stock problem with setup cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 443-460.
    15. Satya Tamby & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2021. "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 72-85, January.
    16. Ibrahim Muter & Tevfik Aytekin, 2017. "Incorporating Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systems Using Scalable Optimization Approaches," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 405-421, August.
    17. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    18. B. S. C. Campello & C. T. L. S. Ghidini & A. O. C. Ayres & W. A. Oliveira, 2022. "A residual recombination heuristic for one-dimensional cutting stock problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 194-220, April.
    19. Krzysztof C. Kiwiel, 2010. "An Inexact Bundle Approach to Cutting-Stock Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 131-143, February.
    20. Mateus Martin & Horacio Hideki Yanasse & Luiz Leduíno Salles-Neto, 2022. "Pattern-based ILP models for the one-dimensional cutting stock problem with setup cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 557-582, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:296:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03317-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.