IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v7y1993i2p275-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Superwoman Syndrome: Gender Differences in Attitudes towards Equal Opportunities at Work and towards Domestic Responsibilities at Home

Author

Listed:
  • Sue Newell

    (Faculty of Science University of Birmingham)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue Newell, 1993. "The Superwoman Syndrome: Gender Differences in Attitudes towards Equal Opportunities at Work and towards Domestic Responsibilities at Home," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(2), pages 275-289, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:2:p:275-289
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709372006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709372006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709372006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart, Mark B & Greenhalgh, Christine A, 1984. "Work History Patterns and the Occupational Attainment of Women," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(375), pages 493-519, September.
    2. M. J. Davidson & C. L. Cooper, 1984. "Occupational Stress In Female Managers: A Comparative Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 185-205, April.
    3. Shirley Dex & Lois B. Shaw, 1986. "British and American Women at Work," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-18267-1, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Coates, 1997. "Organisation Man - Women and Organisational Culture," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(3), pages 15-38, September.
    2. Sue Speakman & Mick Marchington, 1999. "Ambivalent Patriarchs: Shiftworkers, `Breadwinners' and Housework," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(1), pages 83-105, March.
    3. Deniz Yucel, 2016. "Together, Forever? Correlates of Marital Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 257-269, January.
    4. Shradha Kundra & Naman Sreen & Rohit Dwivedi, 2023. "Impact of Work from Home and Family Support on Indian Women’s Work Productivity During COVID-19," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 48(1), pages 39-53, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Brown & Mark N Harris & Jake Prendergast & Preety Srivastava, 2015. "Pharmaceutical Drug Misuse, Industry of Employment and Occupation," Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre Working Paper series WP1501, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School.
    2. Ghousia Jabeen & Gurunadham Goli & Kafila & R. Gobinath, 2024. "A bibliometric review on gender equity in human resource management," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Richard Blundell & Amanda Gosling & Hidehiko Ichimura & Costas Meghir, 2007. "Changes in the Distribution of Male and Female Wages Accounting for Employment Composition Using Bounds," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 323-363, March.
    4. Jay Ginn & Sara Arber, 1996. "Patterns of Employment, Gender and Pensions: The Effect of Work History on Older Women's Non-State Pensions," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 10(3), pages 469-490, September.
    5. Paul Boyle & Thomas Cooke & Keith Halfacree & Darren Smith, 2001. "A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment status," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(2), pages 201-213, May.
    6. Susan J. Owen, 1987. "Household Production and Economic Efficiency: Arguments for and against Domestic Specialization," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(2), pages 157-178, June.
    7. Janet Gornick & Katherin Ross Phillips & Marcia Meyers, 1996. "Public Policies and the Employment of Mothers: A Cross-National Study," LIS Working papers 140, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    8. Victoria Prowse, 2005. "How Damaging is Part-time Employment to a Woman's Occupational Prospects?," Economics Papers 2005-W19, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    9. Hilke Brockmann & Anne-Maren Koch & Adele Diederich & Christofer Edling, 2018. "Why Managerial Women are Less Happy Than Managerial Men," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 755-779, March.
    10. Davies, Rhys & Pierre, Gaelle, 2005. "The family gap in pay in Europe: a cross-country study," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 469-486, August.
    11. Angela Dale, 1987. "Occupational Inequality, Gender and Life-Cycle," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(3), pages 326-351, September.
    12. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:103-204 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mary King, 1995. "Black women’s labor market status: Occupational segregation in the United States and Great Britain," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 23-43, June.
    14. Jill Rubery & Colette Fagan, 1995. "Gender Segregation in Societal Context," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 9(2), pages 213-240, June.
    15. Neuman, Shoshana, 2015. "Job Quality in Segmented Labor Markets: The Israeli Case," CEPR Discussion Papers 10734, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Robert L. Anderson & Kathleen P. Anderson, 1988. "A Comparison of Women in Small and Large Companies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 12(3), pages 23-33, January.
    17. S Pinch, 1993. "Social Polarization: A Comparison of Evidence from Britain and the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(6), pages 779-795, June.
    18. repec:ilo:ilowps:486459 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Heather Antecol, "undated". "An Examination of Cross-Country Differences in the Gender Gap in Labor Force Participation Rates," Canadian International Labour Network Working Papers 37, McMaster University.
    20. Shoshana Neuman, 2014. "Job Quality in Segmented Labor Markets: The Israeli Case," Working Papers 2014-12, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
    21. Neuman, Shoshana., 2014. "Job quality in segmented labour markets : the Israeli case: country case study on labour market segmentation," ILO Working Papers 994864593402676, International Labour Organization.
    22. Miguel Malo & Fernando Muñoz-Bullón, 2008. "Women’s family-related career breaks: a long-term British perspective," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 127-167, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:2:p:275-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.