IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i4p1128-1147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Work–Family Conflict and Enhancement on the Wellbeing of the Self-Employed and Their Spouses: A Dyadic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani

    (Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia)

  • Doina Olaru

    (The University of Western Australia, Australia)

  • Thierry Volery

    (Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of work–family conflict (WFC) and work–family enhancement (WFE) on the wellbeing of the self-employed and their spouses. Adopting a dyadic perspective, our analysis focuses on three dimensions of wellbeing: physical health, mental health and life satisfaction. Using the Spillover and Crossover Model as theoretical framework and the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model as an estimation technique, we investigate how work–family conflict and enhancement among the self-employed and their spouses were associated to their individual and mutual wellbeing. The analysis revealed a strong actor and partner effect, such that one’s own perception of WFC undermined the wellbeing for both the self-employed and their spouses. Further, WFE was associated with an improvement in wellbeing, mainly for the self-employed, and not their spouses. The results partially supported the ‘crossover hypothesis’, suggesting that launching a new business is a stressful endeavour at the dyadic level of the self-employed and their spouses.

Suggested Citation

  • Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani & Doina Olaru & Thierry Volery, 2024. "The Influence of Work–Family Conflict and Enhancement on the Wellbeing of the Self-Employed and Their Spouses: A Dyadic Analysis," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1128-1147, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:1128-1147
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231175769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231175769
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231175769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:1128-1147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.