IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v34y2020i1p3-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solidarities In and Through Work in an Age of Extremes

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Beck

    (University of Bristol, UK)

  • Paul Brook

    (University of Leicester, UK)

Abstract

This article introduces a special issue of Work, Employment and Society on solidarities in and through the experience of work in an age of austerity and political polarisation. It commences by discussing the renaissance of studies of solidarity in the workplace – and beyond. Debates on solidarity as a concept are reviewed in relation to moral economy, labour organising-mobilisation, emotional labour and public sociology. Each of the special issue articles assess the value of the solidarity concept under contemporary conditions. Between them they explore solidarity among gig economy delivery riders (Italy and UK), special needs teachers (England), volunteer lifeboat crews (UK and Ireland) and international ‘social factory’ activists. Two articles examine solidarity within organised labour: first, internationalism among dock workers and second, North American police unions’ construction of a divisive ‘blue solidarity’. The article concludes by calling for continued study of different forms of solidarity in and through work, especially among migrants and individualised workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Beck & Paul Brook, 2020. "Solidarities In and Through Work in an Age of Extremes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 3-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:3-17
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017019881566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017019881566
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017019881566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Pasquier & Alex J Wood, 2018. "The power of social media as a labour campaigning tool: lessons from OUR Walmart and the Fight for 15," Post-Print hal-01903758, HAL.
    2. Hyman, Richard, 2015. "The very idea of democracy at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65573, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Alex J. Wood, 2015. "Networks of injustice and worker mobilisation at Walmart," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 259-274, July.
    4. John Kelly, 2015. "Trade union membership and power in comparative perspective," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 526-544, December.
    5. Sue Durbin & Margaret Page & Sylvia Walby & Emma Craddock, 2017. "Caring About and For the Cuts: a Case Study of the Gendered Dimension of Austerity and Anti-austerity Activism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 69-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John F. Geary, 2022. "Securing collective representation in non‐union European multinational companies: The case of Ryanair pilots’ (partial) success," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 635-661, September.
    2. Jessi Hanson-DeFusco & Natalia Lamberova & Blair Mickles & Tanisha Long & Eliana Beligel & Quinten Boose & Paul Smith & Alexis McMaster & Dragana Djukic-Min, 2024. "#Polarized: Gauging Potential Policy Bargaining Ranges Between Opposing Social Movements of Black Lives Matter and Police Lives Matter," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Jessica Tanghetti & Roberta Comunian & Tamsyn Dent, 2022. "‘Covid-19 opened the pandora box’ of the creative city: creative and cultural workers against precarity in Milan [A heterodox re-reading of creative work: the diverse economies of Danish visual art," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 615-634.
    4. Adam Fishwick & Lucila D’Urso, 2024. "Trade Union Solidarity in Crisis: The Generative Tensions of Worker Solidarities in Argentina," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 44-62, February.
    5. Genevieve Coderre-LaPalme & Ian Greer & Lisa Schulte, 2023. "Welfare, Work and the Conditions of Social Solidarity: British Campaigns to Defend Healthcare and Social Security," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 352-372, April.
    6. Soriano, Cheryll Ruth, 2022. "Class formation and relations among Filipino cloudworkers," MediArXiv p8kjf, Center for Open Science.
    7. David Courpasson & Dima Younès & Michael Ivor Reed, 2021. "Durkheim in the Neoliberal Organization : Taking Resistance and Solidarity Seriously," Post-Print hal-03273207, HAL.
    8. Ruth Reaney & Niall Cullinane, 2024. "Inter-Union Solidarity and Strategic Group Identity: Insights from Works Councils in the French Car Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 377-398, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael David Maffie, 2020. "The Role of Digital Communities in Organizing Gig Workers," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 123-149, January.
    2. Mohammad Sajjad Hussain, 2023. "Learning to Strike in the Gig Economy: Mobilization Efforts by Food Delivery Workers in Hyderabad, India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 431-456, December.
    3. FitzRoy, Felix & Nolan, Michael A., 2020. "Towards Economic Democracy and Social Justice: Profit Sharing, Co-Determination, and Employee Ownership," IZA Discussion Papers 13238, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Dorian Aliu & Ayten Akatay & Armando Aliu & Umut Eroglu, 2017. "Public Policy Influences on Academia in the European Union," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    5. Bengt Furåker, 2020. "European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 345-358, August.
    6. Heather Connolly, 2020. "‘We just get a bit set in our ways’: renewing democracy and solidarity in UK trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 207-222, May.
    7. Verdin, Rachel & O'Reilly, Jacqueline, 2021. "A gender agenda for the future of work in a digital age of pandemics: Jobs, skills and contracts," WSI Studies 24, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    8. Lee, Horan & Staples, Ronald, 2018. "Digitale Solidarität unter Arbeitnehmer*innen [Digital Solidarity among workers]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(4), pages 495-517.
    9. Arthur Corazza, 2020. "Power, interest and insecurity: A comparative analysis of workplace dualization and inclusion in Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 153, European Institute, LSE.
    10. Lijun Tang, 2022. "Defending workers' rights on social media: Chinese seafarers during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 110-125, March.
    11. Michael Ollinger & Friedrich L. Sell, 2017. "What Determines Union Density? A Political Economy Model of the Labor Market with Empirical Evidence in the Context of European Countries," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 10, pages 18-32, November.
    12. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    13. Vincent Pasquier & Thibault Daudigeos & Marcos Barros, 2020. "Towards a New Flashmob Unionism: The Case of the Fight for 15 Movement," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 336-363, June.
    14. Saskia Boumans, 2024. "Employer Discretion: The Role of Collective Agreements in the Liberalization of Industrial Relations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(2), pages 227-250, March.
    15. Anke Strauß & Alexander Fleischmann, 2020. "Reconceptualising Solidarity in the Social Factory: Cultural Work between Economic Needs and Political Desires," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 109-125, February.
    16. Erica Romero Pender & Patricia Elgoibar & Lourdes Munduate & Ana Belén García & Martin C Euwema, 2018. "Improving social dialogue: What employers expect from employee representatives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 169-189, June.
    17. Sell, Friedrich L. & Öllinger, Michael, 2017. "Reward effects and incentive effects on the labor market: Empirical evidence for European countries," Working Papers in Economics 2017,2, Bundeswehr University Munich, Economic Research Group.
    18. Gregor Murray & Christian Lévesque & Glenn Morgan & Nicolas Roby, 2020. "Disruption and re-regulation in work and employment: from organisational to institutional experimentation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 135-156, May.
    19. Raquel Rego & Wim Sprenger & Vassil Kirov & Greg Thomson & Daniele Di Nunzio, 2016. "The use of new ICTs in trade union protests – five European cases," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 315-329, August.
    20. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Robert Hebdon, 2020. "Tweeting and Retweeting for Fight for $15: Unions as Dinosaur Opinion Leaders?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 301-335, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:3-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.