IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v20y2014i3p327-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic crisis and municipal public service employment: comparing developments in seven EU Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Leisink

    (Utrecht University School of Governance, the Netherlands)

  • Stephen Bach

    (Department of Management, King’s College, London, UK)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of austerity policies in seven EU Member States on municipal employment and the ways in which social dialogue can influence consequences for employees. It provides a comparative institutional framework, looking at municipal tasks and powers, and the social dialogue institutions available in the respective countries. In addition, the outcomes of austerity policies are compared with regard to wages, employment levels and the public service provision, as well as the influence of social dialogue institutions on these outcomes. Trade unions and workplace employee representatives face a dilemma, having to choose between concession bargaining and opposition to employer plans in order to preserve public sector employment. Between and within countries there seem to be significant differences in their success. Generally speaking, however, these are tough times for municipal workers, their representatives and citizens dependent on the services municipalities offer.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Leisink & Stephen Bach, 2014. "Economic crisis and municipal public service employment: comparing developments in seven EU Member States," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 327-342, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:327-342
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258914538351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258914538351
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258914538351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera GLASSNER & Maarten KEUNE, 2012. "The crisis and social policy: The role of collective agreements," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 151(4), pages 351-375, December.
    2. László Neumann & Erzsébet Berki & Márk Edelényi, 2014. "Austerity and politically motivated changes – wage bargaining in Hungarian municipal services," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 431-444, August.
    3. Linda M. Lobao & Lazarus Adua, 2011. "State rescaling and local governments' austerity policies across the USA, 2001--2008," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 4(3), pages 419-435.
    4. Gilles Jeannot, 2014. "Austerity and social dialogue in French local government," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 373-386, August.
    5. Berndt Keller, 2014. "The continuation of early austerity measures: the special case of Germany," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 387-402, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabina Stan & Idar Helle & Roland Erne, 2015. "European collective action in times of crisis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 131-139, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrike Weske & Peter Leisink & Eva Knies, 2014. "Local government austerity policies in the Netherlands: the effectiveness of social dialogue in preserving public service employment," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 403-416, August.
    2. Maarten Keune, 2015. "The effects of the EU’s assault on collective bargaining: less governance capacity and more inequality," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(4), pages 477-483, November.
    3. Gilles Jeannot, 2014. "Austerity and social dialogue in French local government," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 373-386, August.
    4. Mark Davidson & Kevin Ward, 2022. "Post-great recession municipal budgeting and governance: A mixed methods analysis of budget stress and reform," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 634-652, June.
    5. Markus Leibrecht & Silvia Rocha-Akis, 2014. "Sozialpartnerschaft und makroökonomische Performance," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(8), pages 555-567, August.
    6. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2015. "Understanding employment growth in the recession: the geographic diversity of state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 359-377.
    7. Paul Marginson & Maarten Keune & Dorothee Bohle, 2014. "Negotiating the effects of uncertainty? The governance capacity of collective bargaining under pressure," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 37-51, February.
    8. Vera Glassner, 2013. "Central and eastern European industrial relations in the crisis: national divergence and path-dependent change," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 155-169, May.
    9. Véra‐Line Montreuil & Roland Foucher, 2023. "Technological changes in the era of digitalization: What do collective agreements tell us?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 20-39, January.
    10. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2022. "Crowding Out Development: Fiscal Federalism after the Great Recession," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 311-329, March.
    11. Haikola, Simon & Anshelm, Jonas, 2020. "Evolutionary governance in mining: Boom and bust in peripheral communities in Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Crispian Fuller, 2017. "City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 745-766, April.
    13. Maarten Keune, 2021. "Inequality between capital and labour and among wage-earners: the role of collective bargaining and trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.
    14. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2013:v:39i:3p:291 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Alessia Vatta, 2022. "The evolution of Italian bilateral bodies and funds in a comparative perspective," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 32-51, February.
    16. Crispian Fuller & Karen West, 2017. "The possibilities and limits of political contestation in times of ‘urban austerity’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2087-2106, July.
    17. Félix Adisson & Francesca Artioli, 2020. "Four types of urban austerity: Public land privatisations in French and Italian cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 75-92, January.
    18. Werner Schmidt & Andrea Müller, 2024. "Differing industrial relations: The public and the private sector in Germany," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 285-302, July.
    19. Jörg Flecker & Franz Schultheis & Berthold Vogel, 2016. "A ‘Problem of Fairness’ in the Making: The Transformation of Public Services from the Perspective of Postal Workers," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 768-789, December.
    20. Turley Gerard & McNena Stephen & Robbins Geraldine, 2018. "Austerity and Irish local government expenditure since the Great Recession," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 66(4), pages 1-24, December.
    21. Mildred E Warner & Paige M Kelly & Xue Zhang, 2023. "Challenging austerity under the COVID-19 state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 197-209.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:327-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.