IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v51y2020i4p443-460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Escape Rooms for Conducting Team Research: Understanding Development, Considerations, and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Tara N. Cohen
  • Andrew C. Griggs
  • Joseph R. Keebler
  • Elizabeth H. Lazzara
  • Shawn M. Doherty
  • Falisha F. Kanji
  • Bruce L. Gewertz

Abstract

Background. Modern organizations are increasingly reliant on teams, and many organizations are subsequently concerned with the development of interventions that can improve the performance of teams. Escape rooms are beginning to receive attention as a potential avenue to facilitate team-based research. Escape rooms are team-based recreational activities that require a team of individuals to work together and think critically in order to solve a series of puzzles or challenges to escape a room. Purpose. This article provides considerations for researchers and organizations alike concerning the development of an escape room for team-based research, its methodological applications , and challenges associated with the use of escape rooms in research. Developmental considerations include issues such as an escape room’s location and size, financial considerations, theme development, other characteristics of the escape room, the development of puzzles and challenges, prototyping efforts, and the development of hints. Conclusion. Research considerations include the use of observational and survey methods in data collection, measurement of team processes and team performance, and how elements of an escape room influence teamwork and problem solving . Various challenges associated with the use of escape rooms in team-based research include considerations for dealing with cheating behavior, providing hints to participants, and resetting the room between experimental trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Tara N. Cohen & Andrew C. Griggs & Joseph R. Keebler & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Shawn M. Doherty & Falisha F. Kanji & Bruce L. Gewertz, 2020. "Using Escape Rooms for Conducting Team Research: Understanding Development, Considerations, and Challenges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 443-460, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:4:p:443-460
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120907943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120907943
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120907943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean Tjosvold & Zi‐you Yu & Chun Hui, 2004. "Team Learning from Mistakes: The Contribution of Cooperative Goals and Problem‐Solving," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1223-1245, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shawn M. Doherty & Andrew C. Griggs & Elizabeth H. Lazzara & Joseph R. Keebler & Bruce L. Gewertz & Tara N. Cohen, 2023. "Planning an Escape: Considerations for the Development of Applied Escape Rooms," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(2), pages 150-166, April.
    2. Agoritsa Makri & Dimitrios Vlachopoulos & Richard A. Martina, 2021. "Digital Escape Rooms as Innovative Pedagogical Tools in Education: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Willy C. Kriz, 2020. "Gaming in the Time of COVID-19," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 403-410, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hampel, Tim, 2024. "Mistakes at work are judged more negatively in routine tasks than in complex tasks," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 12 (Oktober 2024), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    2. Sushil & Kamala Kannan Dinesh, 2022. "Structured Literature Review with TISM Leading to an Argumentation Based Conceptual Model," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(3), pages 387-407, September.
    3. Yueqiao Qiao & Zhe Zhang & Ming Jia, 2021. "Their Pain, Our Pleasure: How and When Peer Abusive Supervision Leads to Third Parties’ Schadenfreude and Work Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 695-711, April.
    4. Gressgård, Leif Jarle & Hansen, Kåre, 2015. "Knowledge exchange and learning from failures in distributed environments: The role of contractor relationship management and work characteristics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 167-175.
    5. Mingze Li & Shuting Peng & Liwen Liu, 2022. "How Do Team Cooperative Goals Influence Thriving at Work: The Mediating Role of Team Time Consensus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Wu, Long-Zeng & Ferris, D. Lance & Kwan, Ho Kwong & Chiang, Flora & Snape, Ed & Liang, Lindie H., 2015. "Breaking (or making) the silence: How goal interdependence and social skill predict being ostracized," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 51-66.
    7. Sutopo Sutopo & Bayu Rahmat Setiadi & Muhammad Nurtanto & Sigit Purnomo & Nurcholish Arifin Handoyono & Arif Bintoro Johan, 2020. "Enhancing of Student Collaboration in Thinking, Pairing, and Sharing on Energy Conversion Learning," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(4), pages 199-199, August.
    8. Ben Lupton & Richard Warren, 2018. "Managing Without Blame? Insights from the Philosophy of Blame," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 41-52, September.
    9. Dean A. Shepherd & Holger Patzelt & Trenton A. Williams & Dennis Warnecke, 2014. "How Does Project Termination Impact Project Team Members? Rapid Termination, ‘Creeping Death’, and Learning from Failure," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 513-546, June.
    10. Khalil Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2021. "Learning from innovation failures: a systematic review of the literature and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 189-234, February.
    11. Wing Shing Lee, 2020. "An Experimental Investigation Into the Application of a Learning-From-Mistakes Approach Among Freshmen Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    12. Rhaiem, Khalil & Halilem, Norrin, 2023. "The worst is not to fail, but to fail to learn from failure: A multi-method empirical validation of learning from innovation failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Qingyan Ye & Duanxu Wang & Xi Li, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and employees’ learning from errors: A moderated mediation model," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 462-481, August.
    14. Dahlin, Kristina & Chuang, You-Ta & Roulet, Thomas J, 2018. "Opportunity, Motivation, and Ability to Learn from Failures and Errors: Review, Synthesis, and Ways to Move Forward," SocArXiv 4qwzh, Center for Open Science.
    15. Jacobo Gomez‐Conde & Ernesto Lopez‐Valeiras & Ricardo Malagueño & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2022. "Quality of performance metrics, informal peer monitoring and goal commitment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 4041-4077, September.
    16. Ambra Galeazzo & Andrea Furlan & Andrea Vinelli, 2017. "The organizational infrastructure of continuous improvement – an empirical analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 33-46, June.
    17. Roberta Laurita, 2022. "I team multidisciplinari in sanit?: evidenze da un?analisi nazionale," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(124), pages 45-63.
    18. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Atwater, Leanne & Jolly, Phillip & Ugwuanyi, Ijeoma & Baik, Kibok & Yu, Jia, 2021. "Supportive leadership and job performance: Contributions of supportive climate, team-member exchange (TMX), and group-mean TMX," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 661-674.
    19. Maija Vähämäki, 2005. "Democratic dialogue and collective learning in the context of self-managed teams," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 1(1), pages 109-115, November.
    20. Danneels, Erwin & Vestal, Alex, 2020. "Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:4:p:443-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.