IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v49y2018i6p602-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Teams in a Digital Game Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Mayer

Abstract

Background. Despite the increasing pervasiveness of digital entertainment and serious games in organisational life, there is little evidence for the validity of game-based team training and assessment . Aim. The authors used the game, TEAMUP for a series of team training and assessment sessions, while at the same time researching the internal validity of the game for this purpose. Method. A total of 106 sets of data on games played by teams of professionals (police officers, auditors, consultants, etc.) and undergraduates and postgraduates (in aerospace engineering, entrepreneurship, etc.) were gathered for analysis through pre- and post-game questionnaires focusing on constructs for team quality, such as psychological safety and team cohesiveness . In addition, a large quantity of such data as time to complete task, distance and avoidable mistakes were logged to measure in-game team performance . Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to find relationships between team structure factors, team quality constructs and in-game performance measures. Results. The main finding is that the in-game performance measure ‘ avoidable mistakes ’ (a proxy for task quality) correlates markedly and pervasively with ‘ team cohesiveness ’. More important, the findings support the premise that in-game assessment can be internally valid for team research and assessment purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Mayer, 2018. "Assessment of Teams in a Digital Game Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(6), pages 602-619, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:49:y:2018:i:6:p:602-619
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878118770831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878118770831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878118770831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seers, Anson, 1989. "Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 118-135, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willy Christian Kriz, 2018. "Research of the Active Substance of Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(6), pages 595-601, December.
    2. Liu Yi & Qiqi Zhou & Tan Xiao & Ge Qing & Igor Mayer, 2020. "Conscientiousness in Game-Based Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 712-734, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    2. Kanbur, Ravi & Fleurbaey, Marc & Viney, Brody, 2020. "Social Externalities and Economic Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 15179, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Jody Hoffer Gittell, 2001. "Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 468-483, August.
    4. Jeremy D. Mackey & Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander, 2021. "Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 755-775, February.
    5. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    6. Filiz Tabak & Aharon Tziner & Or Shkoler & Edna Rabenu, 2021. "The Complexity of Heavy Work Investment (HWI): A Conceptual Integration and Review of Antecedents, Dimensions, and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Laetitia Renier & Claudia Toma, 2018. "Support, Supported, and Supporting: Meta-Perception as the Missing Link in Organizational Behavior," Working Papers CEB 18-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Dedy Dewanto, 2022. "The characteristic of leader innovativeness, a case in Indonesian’s construction industry," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(8), pages 153-165, November.
    9. Meng Shao & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu, 2022. "To drink or not to drink; that is the question! Antecedents and consequences of employee business drinking," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 343-363, March.
    10. Bertolt Meyer & Meir Shemla & Jia Li & Jürgen Wegge, 2015. "On the Same Side of the Faultline: Inclusion in the Leader's Subgroup and Employee Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 354-380, May.
    11. Chung-Jen Wang, 2021. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? Linking Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy to Intention to Stay in the Hospitality Industry Based on Internship Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Thomas W. H. Ng & Lorenzo Lucianetti & Dennis Y. Hsu & Frederick H. K. Yim & Kelly L. Sorensen, 2021. "You Speak, I Speak: The Social‐Cognitive Mechanisms of Voice Contagion," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1569-1608, September.
    13. Alge, Bradley J. & Wiethoff, Carolyn & Klein, Howard J., 2003. "When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 26-37, May.
    14. Commeiras, Nathalie & Loubes, Anne & Bories-Azeau, Isabelle, 2013. "Identification of organizational socialization tactics: The case of sales and marketing trainees in higher education," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 164-178.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15199 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Dedy Dewanto Soeprapto, 2021. "Correlation between knowledge exchange & combination (KEC) and leader member exchange (LMX)," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 169-182, June.
    17. Minjoo Chung & Aeeun Jeon, 2020. "Social exchange approach, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in the airline industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(2), pages 241-261, June.
    18. Hoegl, Martin & Proserpio, Luigi, 2004. "Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1153-1165, October.
    19. Muethel, Miriam & Hoegl, Martin, 2013. "Shared leadership effectiveness in independent professional teams," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 423-432.
    20. Tsang-Kai Hung & Chih-Hung Wang & Mu Tian & Ya-Jiun Yang, 2020. "A Cross-Level Investigation of Team-Member Exchange on Team and Individual Job Crafting with the Moderating Effect of Regulatory Focus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    21. Breidenthal, Amy P. & Liu, Dong & Bai, Yuntao & Mao, Yina, 2020. "The dark side of creativity: Coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 242-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:49:y:2018:i:6:p:602-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.