IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i1p21582440231219555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Raving Fans or Silent Critics? Brand Service Recovery’s Impact on Positive eWOM

Author

Listed:
  • Halima Habuba Mohamed
  • Yongjun Li
  • Ataullah Kiani
  • Usman Ghani

Abstract

Brand Service Recovery Strategies (BSRS) have garnered significant attention due to their transformative potential in traditional business practices. However, the precise influence of BSRS on fostering positive Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) remains inadequately elucidated within the academic literature. Most scholarly investigations have tended to adopt either a theoretical perspective or have overlooked intermediary factors, particularly the role of consumer attitudes toward the brand. Drawing upon the Social Exchange Theory, this study presents an empirical model that seeks to examine whether consumer attitude toward the brand mediates the relationship between BSRS and positive eWOM. Based on survey data from 292 Executive MBA students in a large Chinese university, our study confirms that BSRS strongly impact consumer attitudes, leading to increased positive eWOM. Additionally, we discover that consumer power plays a moderating role, highlighting its contextual importance in this relationship. This study provides vital practical insights for businesses, emphasizing the need for comprehensive strategies involving BSRS, fostering positive consumer attitudes, active eWOM engagement, tailored approaches for consumer power, and ongoing adaptation to customer feedback, all contributing to improved brand perception and customer satisfaction in today’s business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Halima Habuba Mohamed & Yongjun Li & Ataullah Kiani & Usman Ghani, 2024. "Raving Fans or Silent Critics? Brand Service Recovery’s Impact on Positive eWOM," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440231, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440231219555
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231219555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231219555
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231219555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440231219555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.