IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v91y2018icp1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers' gift preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Woo Jin
  • Park, JaeHong
  • Yoon, Ho-Jung

Abstract

Past research on gift-giving behaviors has presumed equal and horizontal relationships between givers and receivers; however, in the real world, giver-receiver relationships often vary in their level of power, such as parent-child and boss-employee relationships. However, little is known regarding how the difference in power in the giver-receiver relationship influences people's gift choices. Building on construal level theory, the present research proposes and confirms that differences in interpersonal power between givers and receivers can affect the desirability versus feasibility of gifts, which in turn influences individuals' gift preferences. By highlighting the role of power in the gift-giving/receiving situations, these findings contribute to research on gift-giving, while also providing practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Woo Jin & Park, JaeHong & Yoon, Ho-Jung, 2018. "Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers' gift preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1-7
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318302698
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holt, Douglas B, 1995. "How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Markus Giesler, 2006. "Consumer Gift Systems," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 283-290, August.
    3. Garbinsky, Emily N. & Klesse, Anne-Kathrin & Aaker, Jennifer, 2014. "Money in the Bank: Feeling Powerful Increases Saving," Research Papers 2146, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Post-Print hal-00621230, HAL.
    5. Derek D. Rucker & David Dubois & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1029.
    6. Emily N. Garbinsky & Anne-Kathrin Klesse & Jennifer Aaker, 2014. "Money in the Bank: Feeling Powerful Increases Saving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 610-623.
    7. Derek D. Rucker & Miao Hu & Adam D. Galinsky, 2014. "The Experience versus the Expectations of Power: A Recipe for Altering the Effects of Power on Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 381-396.
    8. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky & David Dubois, 2012. "Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value," Post-Print hal-00724231, HAL.
    9. Mehdi Mourali & Zhiyong Yang, 2013. "The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 539-554.
    10. Ernest Baskin & Cheryl J. Wakslak & Yaacov Trope & Nathan Novemsky, 2014. "Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 169-182.
    11. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2008. "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 257-267, April.
    12. Dahee Han & Ashok K. Lalwani & Adam Duhachek, 2017. "Power Distance Belief, Power, and Charitable Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 182-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Branco-Illodo, Ines & Heath, Teresa, 2020. "The ‘perfect gift’ and the ‘best gift ever’: An integrative framework for truly special gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 418-424.
    2. Givi, Julian & Galak, Jeff & Olivola, Christopher Y., 2021. "The thought that counts is the one we ignore: How givers overestimate the importance of relative gift value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 502-515.
    3. Givi, Julian, 2021. "When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 393-405.
    4. Abe, Makoto & Kaneko, Mitsuru, 2022. "Preference reversal: Analysis using construal level theory that incorporates discounting," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    5. Givi, Julian, 2020. "(Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 87-98.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    2. Khalil, Mary & Khan, Saira & Septianto, Felix, 2020. "Effects of power and implicit theories on donation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 98-107.
    3. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    4. Wei, Chuang & Liu, Maggie Wenjing & Keh, Hean Tat, 2020. "The road to consumer forgiveness is paved with money or apology? The roles of empathy and power in service recovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 321-334.
    5. Veronica L. Thomas & Kendra Fowler & Christina Saenger, 2020. "Celebrity influence on word of mouth: the interplay of power states and power expectations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 105-120, March.
    6. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    7. Yufei Zhang & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Andrew S. Manikas & Abhi Bhattacharya, 2023. "To exploit or explore? The impact of crowdfunding project descriptions and backers’ power states on funding decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 444-462, March.
    8. Wong, Jimmy & Newton, Joshua D. & Newton, Fiona J., 2014. "Effects of power and individual-level cultural orientation on preferences for volunteer tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 132-140.
    9. Wang, Wangshuai & Raghunathan, Rajagopal & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Powerlessness, variety-seeking, and the mediating role of need for autonomy," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 706-723.
    10. Yong Zhang & Jiayu Ao & Jiayue Deng, 2019. "The Influence of High–Low Power on Green Consumption: The Moderating Effect of Impression Management Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Wang, Yajin, 2022. "A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 788-803.
    12. Mourali, Mehdi & Yang, Zhiyong & Pons, Frank & Hassay, Derek, 2018. "Consumer power and choice deferral: The role of anticipated regret," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 81-99.
    13. Michael J. Barone & T. J. Bae & Shanshan Qian & Jason d’Mello, 2017. "Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-447, September.
    14. S. Venus Jin & Ehri Ryu, 2022. "“The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations ," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 414-448, March.
    15. Sheng Bi & Jun Pang & Huan Chen & Andrew Perkins, 2024. "When feeling powerless, we crave nostalgia: The impact of powerlessness on the preference for nostalgic products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 998-1017, July.
    16. Park, Sehoon & Kim, Chaeyeong & Park, Jane, 2023. "How power distance belief, self-construal, and relationship norms impact conspicuous consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Katarzyna Sekścińska & Joanna Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, 2021. "How Power Influences Decision-Makers’ Investment Behavior in the Domains of Loss and Gain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    18. D. M. Sachinthanee Dissanayake & Ananda K. L. Jayawardana, 2023. "The impact of personal sense of power on unethical decision-making: a moderated mediation model of love of money motive and power distance orientation," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 19-34, March.
    19. Lu Yang & Yuhuang Zheng & Rui Chen, 2021. "Who has a cushion? The interactive effect of social exclusion and gender on fixed savings," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1398-1415, December.
    20. Zhang, Mingyue & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2024. "Risk-taking to restore negative self-view: The effect of autonomy and subjective business on financial risk-taking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.