IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v179y2024ics0148296324001784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of Janus fit brand extensions on perceived brand innovativeness

Author

Listed:
  • Falana, Wuraola Oluwabukola
  • Aspara, Jaakko
  • Frösén, Johanna

Abstract

This research addresses “Janus fit” brand extensions: extensions that are perceived to have both “fitting” and “unfitting” associations vis-a-vis the parent brand. One pre-experiment and three main experiments show that when a brand introduces a Janus fit brand extension, it is perceived to be more innovative than when it introduces either a traditional high fit extension or a low fit extension. The effects are mediated by surprise feelings. Specifically, the high brand innovativeness ratings obtained by the Janus fit extensions are explained by the fact that they elicit moderately high surprise feelings in consumers, instead of low surprise feelings (as high fit extensions) or excessively high surprise feelings (as low fit extensions). The Janus fit extensions can also be seen to evoke a “Eureka surprise experience”: an initial feeling of surprise, followed by a sudden realization that the brand extension after all makes sense for the brand in question.

Suggested Citation

  • Falana, Wuraola Oluwabukola & Aspara, Jaakko & Frösén, Johanna, 2024. "The impact of Janus fit brand extensions on perceived brand innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324001784
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324001784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul W. Miniard & Rama K. Jayanti & Cecilia M. O. Alvarez & Peter R. Dickson, 2018. "What brand extensions need to fully benefit from their parental heritage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 948-963, September.
    2. Géraldine Michel & Carlos Torelli & Nathalie Fleck & Benoit Hubert, 2022. "Self-brand values congruity and incongruity: Their impacts on self-expansion and consumers’ responses to brands," Post-Print hal-03518525, HAL.
    3. Yuan, Ruizhi & Liu, Martin J. & Luo, Jun & Yen, Dorothy A., 2016. "Reciprocal transfer of brand identity and image associations arising from higher education brand extensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3069-3076.
    4. Aguirre-Rodriguez, Alexandra & Bóveda-Lambie, Adriana M. & Montoya, Detra Y., 2014. "Exploring ethnic consumer response to crossover brand extensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 457-463.
    5. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2021. "How less congruent new products drive brand engagement: The role of curiosity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Jeffrey R. Parker & Donald R. Lehmann & Kevin Lane Keller & Martin G. Schleicher, 2018. "Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 300-316, March.
    7. Wang, Haizhong & Liu, Di, 2020. "The differentiated impact of perceived brand competence type on brand extension evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 400-410.
    8. Nicolas Pontes & Vivian Pontes, 2021. "Spillover effects of competitive rivalry on brand extensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 402-412, July.
    9. Jun, Sung Youl & Mazumdar, Tridib & Raj, S. P., 1999. "Effects of Technological Hierarchy on Brand Extension Evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 31-43, September.
    10. Yuen, Tsunwai Wesley & Nieroda, Marzena & He, Hongwei & Park, Yunseul, 2021. "Can dissimilarity in product category be an opportunity for cross-gender brand extension?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 348-357.
    11. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    12. Isabelle Ulrich & Salim Azar & Isabelle Aimé, 2020. "Stay close but not too close: The role of similarity in the cross-gender extension of patronymic brands," Post-Print hal-03065882, HAL.
    13. Géraldine Michel & Naveen Donthu, 2014. "Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations," Post-Print halshs-01898203, HAL.
    14. Michel, Géraldine & Torelli, Carlos J. & Fleck, Nathalie & Hubert, Benoit, 2022. "Self-brand values congruity and incongruity: Their impacts on self-expansion and consumers’ responses to brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 301-316.
    15. Larisa Kovalenko & Alina Sorescu & Mark B. Houston, 2022. "What brand do I use for my new product? The impact of new product branding decisions on firm value," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 338-365, March.
    16. Milberg, Sandra J. & Sinn, Francisca, 2008. "Vulnerability of global brands to negative feedback effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 684-690, June.
    17. Michel, Géraldine & Donthu, Naveen, 2014. "Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2611-2619.
    18. Zachary S Johnson & Yichao Tian & Sangwon Lee, 2016. "Country-of-origin fit: When does a discrepancy between brand origin and country of manufacture reduce consumers’ product evaluations?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 403-418, July.
    19. Sheinin, Daniel A., 2000. "The Effects of Experience with Brand Extensions on Parent Brand Knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 47-55, July.
    20. Kim, Chung K. & Lavack, Anne M. & Smith, Margo, 2001. "Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 211-222, June.
    21. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    22. Michael S. Mccarthy & Timothy B. Heath & Sandra J. Milberg, 2001. "New Brands Versus Brand Extensions, Attitudes Versus Choice: Experimental Evidence for Theory and Practice," Post-Print hal-00668872, HAL.
    23. Swaminathan, Vanitha, 2003. "Sequential brand extensions and brand choice behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 431-442, June.
    24. Franziska Völckner & Henrik Sattler & Gwen Kaufmann, 2008. "Image feedback effects of brand extensions: Evidence from a longitudinal field study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 109-124, June.
    25. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    26. Alokparna Basu Monga & Deborah Roedder John, 2007. "Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic versus Holistic Thinking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 529-536, December.
    27. Miniard, Paul W. & Alvarez, Cecilia M.O. & Mohammed, Shazad M., 2020. "Consumer acceptance of brand extensions: Is parental fit preeminent?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-345.
    28. Gierl, Heribert & Huettl, Verena, 2011. "A closer look at similarity: The effects of perceived similarity and conjunctive cues on brand extension evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 120-133.
    29. Ulrich, Isabelle & Azar, Salim L. & Aimé, Isabelle, 2020. "Stay close but not too close: The role of similarity in the cross-gender extension of patronymic brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 157-174.
    30. Deng, Qian (Claire) & Messinger, Paul R., 2022. "Dimensions of brand-extension fit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 764-787.
    31. Braun, Kathryn A, 1999. "Postexperience Advertising Effects on Consumer Memory," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(4), pages 319-334, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    2. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2021. "How less congruent new products drive brand engagement: The role of curiosity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 13-24.
    3. Zhou, Zhimin & Ding, Yi & Feng, Wenting & Ke, Nianman, 2021. "Extending B2B brands into the B2C market: Whether, when, and how brands should emphasize B2B industry background," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 364-375.
    4. Anja Plumeyer & Pascal Kottemann & Daniel Böger & Reinhold Decker, 2019. "Measuring brand image: a systematic review, practical guidance, and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 227-265, April.
    5. Burcu Sezen & Koen Pauwels & Berk Ataman, 2024. "How do line extensions impact brand sales? The role of feature similarity and brand architecture," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(3), pages 537-550, September.
    6. Santos, Glauber Eduardo de Oliveira & Giraldi, Janaina de Moura Engracia, 2017. "Reciprocal effect of tourist destinations on the strength of national tourism brands," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 443-450.
    7. Deng, Qian (Claire) & Messinger, Paul R., 2022. "Dimensions of brand-extension fit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 764-787.
    8. Dimitriu, Radu & Warlop, Luk, 2022. "Is similarity a constraint for service-to-service brand extensions?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1019-1041.
    9. E. Bacchiega & M. Colucci & M. Magnani, 2019. "What goes around, comes around: Reciprocal effects and double-sided moral hazard in the choice of brand licensing," Working Papers wp1136, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    10. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    11. Smith, Robert W. & Keller, Kevin Lane, 2021. "If all their products seem the same, all the parts within a product seem the same too: How brand homogeneity polarizes product experiences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 698-714.
    12. Beichen Liang & Wei Fu, 2021. "The choice of brand extension: the moderating role of brand loyalty on fit and brand familiarity," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 17-32, March.
    13. Jeffrey R. Parker & Donald R. Lehmann & Kevin Lane Keller & Martin G. Schleicher, 2018. "Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 300-316, March.
    14. Delgado-Ballester, Elena & Fernandez-Sabiote, Estela, 2024. "Brand Stereotypes: On the relationships with gendered brand personality and agentic and communal values in fostering Consumer–Brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Chung-Yu Wang & Li-Wei Wu & Chen-Yu Lin & Ruei-Jie Chen, 2017. "Purchase Intention toward the Extension and Parent Brand: The Role of Brand Commitment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103, February.
    16. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2018. "An Integrated SEM Neural Network Approach to Study Effectiveness of Brand Extension in Indian FMCG Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 6(2), pages 113-128, July.
    17. Maaike Mulder-Nijkamp & Mendel Kok & Viktor Klassen & Wouter Eggink, 2024. "Innovating the Archetype: Discovering the Boundaries of the Triangular Designer Space," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 120-139, May.
    18. Kunter Gunasti & Hans Baumgartner, 2016. "The Asymmetric Effects of Positive Or Negative Experiences with an Extension on Low- or High-Equity Parent Brands: A Microtheoretical Notion," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(3), pages 126-143, December.
    19. Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao & Chawdhary, Rahul, 2023. "‘Co-branding as a masstige strategy for luxury brands: Desirable or not?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2017. "Evaluating the Feedback Effects of Brand Extension on Parent Brand Equity: A Study on Indian FMCG Industry," Vision, , vol. 21(3), pages 305-313, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324001784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.