IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211067246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderating Role of Attachment in the Associations Between Group Variables and OCB

Author

Listed:
  • Abira Reizer
  • Lior Oren
  • Yonadav Hornik

Abstract

The current study expands previous knowledge by investigating the moderating role of attachment styles in the associations between perceived group cohesion, perceived collective efficacy, and changes in the individual report of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Data were collected from 180 employees, who took part in a 9-week organizational training course. Upon start of training, participants completed questionnaires assessing their attachment orientations and their individual-level OCB. Upon conclusion, participants completed questionnaires assessing their perceived group cohesion, perceived group efficacy, and OCB. Using hierarchical linear modeling, both group cohesion and efficacy explained the changes in the individual OCB. In addition, attachment anxiety moderated the associations between group efficacy, group cohesion and the changes in OCB. The results emphasize the joint effects of group-and individual-level variables in predicting OCB in a longitudinal design. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Abira Reizer & Lior Oren & Yonadav Hornik, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Attachment in the Associations Between Group Variables and OCB," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211067246
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211067246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211067246
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211067246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao-Ping Chen & Simon S. K. Lam & Stefanie E. Naumann & John Schaubroeck, 2005. "Group Citizenship Behaviour: Conceptualization and Preliminary Tests of its Antecedents and Consequences," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 1(2), pages 273-300, July.
    2. Esther Cuadrado & Carmen Tabernero, 2015. "Affective Balance, Team Prosocial Efficacy and Team Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of Prosocial Behavior in Small Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Chen, Xiao-Ping & Lam, Simon S. K. & Naumann, Stefanie E. & Schaubroeck, John, 2005. "Group Citizenship Behaviour Conceptualization and Preliminary Tests of its Antecedents and Consequences," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 273-300, July.
    4. Goncalo, Jack A. & Polman, Evan & Maslach, Christina, 2010. "Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 13-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher R. Dishop & Richard P. DeShon, 2021. "What is the critical mass of help? A potential resolution to a paradox on citizenship and organizational performance," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 93-107, March.
    2. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    3. Maureen L. Ambrose & Darryl B. Rice & David M. Mayer, 2021. "Justice Climate and Workgroup Outcomes: The Role of Coworker Fair Behavior and Workgroup Structure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 79-99, August.
    4. Ling, Qian & Lin, Meizhen & Wu, Xiaoyi, 2016. "The trickle-down effect of servant leadership on frontline employee service behaviors and performance: A multilevel study of Chinese hotels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 341-368.
    5. Liang, Yongyi & Yan, Ming & Law, Kenneth S. & Wang, Haibo & Chen, Yuanyi, 2021. "Integrating the bright and dark sides of leadership: An investigation of the intragroup and intergroup effects of leader group prototypicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 89-97.
    6. Xiaowan Lin, 2015. "How does procedural justice climate influence individual outcomes? An affective perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 771-800, September.
    7. Priyanko Guchait & Ayşın Paşamehmetoğlu & Juan Madera, 2016. "Error management culture: impact on cohesion, stress, and turnover intentions," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3-4), pages 124-141, February.
    8. Karam, Charlotte M. & Kwantes, Catherine T., 2011. "Contextualizing Cultural Orientation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 303-315.
    9. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Tingting Liu & Yahui Chen & Chenhong Hu & Xiao Yuan & Chang-E Liu & Wei He, 2020. "The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral Justification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Carole L. Jurkiewicz & Robert A. Giacalone, 2016. "Organizational Determinants of Ethical Dysfunctionality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 1-12, June.
    12. E. Cuadrado & L. H. Macias-Zambrano & A. J. Carpio & C. Tabernero, 2022. "The moderating effect of collective efficacy on the relationship between environmental values and ecological behaviors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4175-4202, March.
    13. Franke, Henrik & Foerstl, Kai, 2018. "Fostering integrated research on organizational politics and conflict in teams: A cross-phenomenal review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 593-607.
    14. Sicheng Luo & Hao-Chieh Lin, 2022. "How do TMT shared cognitions shape firm performance? The roles of collective efficacy, trust, and competitive aggressiveness," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 295-318, March.
    15. Jennifer A. Chatman & Lindred L. Greer & Eliot Sherman & Bernadette Doerr, 2019. "Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 235-259, March.
    16. Stephanie Schoss & Diemo Urbig & Malte Brettel & René Mauer, 2022. "Deep-level diversity in entrepreneurial teams and the mediating role of conflicts on team efficacy and satisfaction," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1173-1203, September.
    17. Mohd Yusri Ibrahim* & Ruzaini Sulaiman, 2018. "Conceptual Model of Leadership Communication, Collective Efficacy & Job Performance of Village Leader," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(11), pages 257-262, 11-2018.
    18. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211067246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.