IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v1y2005i02p273-300_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Citizenship Behaviour Conceptualization and Preliminary Tests of its Antecedents and Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xiao-Ping
  • Lam, Simon S. K.
  • Naumann, Stefanie E.
  • Schaubroeck, John

Abstract

Group citizenship behaviour (GCB) is conceptualized as a distinct group-level phenomenon concerning the extent to which work groups engage in behaviours that support other work groups and the organization as a whole. These behaviours are different from task performance; they enhance and maintain the social and psychological environment in which task performance occurs. Based on the referent-shift consensus model (Chan, 1998), we developed a GCB scale and examined its nomological network. In a sample of 148 work groups in the Hong Kong office of a multinational bank (a total of 743 employees), between-group differences in GCB were greater than within-group differences. GCB was positively associated with procedural justice climate and work group leadership support. Work group cohesiveness and group-organizational goal congruence interactively predicted GCB, as did the negative affective tone of the group and the group's negative affectivity homogeneity. In addition, GCB was positively related to group performance, and negatively related to employee turnover intentions. The theoretical and empirical implications of this study are discussed in the context of Chinese organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xiao-Ping & Lam, Simon S. K. & Naumann, Stefanie E. & Schaubroeck, John, 2005. "Group Citizenship Behaviour Conceptualization and Preliminary Tests of its Antecedents and Consequences," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 273-300, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:1:y:2005:i:02:p:273-300_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877600001121/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Yongyi & Yan, Ming & Law, Kenneth S. & Wang, Haibo & Chen, Yuanyi, 2021. "Integrating the bright and dark sides of leadership: An investigation of the intragroup and intergroup effects of leader group prototypicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 89-97.
    2. Priyanko Guchait & Ayşın Paşamehmetoğlu & Juan Madera, 2016. "Error management culture: impact on cohesion, stress, and turnover intentions," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3-4), pages 124-141, February.
    3. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Xiaowan Lin, 2015. "How does procedural justice climate influence individual outcomes? An affective perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 771-800, September.
    5. Ling, Qian & Lin, Meizhen & Wu, Xiaoyi, 2016. "The trickle-down effect of servant leadership on frontline employee service behaviors and performance: A multilevel study of Chinese hotels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 341-368.
    6. Tingting Liu & Yahui Chen & Chenhong Hu & Xiao Yuan & Chang-E Liu & Wei He, 2020. "The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral Justification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    8. Christopher R. Dishop & Richard P. DeShon, 2021. "What is the critical mass of help? A potential resolution to a paradox on citizenship and organizational performance," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 93-107, March.
    9. Karam, Charlotte M. & Kwantes, Catherine T., 2011. "Contextualizing Cultural Orientation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 303-315.
    10. Abira Reizer & Lior Oren & Yonadav Hornik, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Attachment in the Associations Between Group Variables and OCB," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    11. Maureen L. Ambrose & Darryl B. Rice & David M. Mayer, 2021. "Justice Climate and Workgroup Outcomes: The Role of Coworker Fair Behavior and Workgroup Structure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 79-99, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:1:y:2005:i:02:p:273-300_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.