IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211054483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Developmental View of Authorial Voice Construction in Master’s Thesis: A Case Study of Two Novice L2 Writers

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhao
  • Yingliang Liu

Abstract

Effective authorial voice in academic writing helps researchers establish the value of their scholarly contributions. However, constructing an authorial voice is challenging for many novice L2 writers. Through tracking multiple drafts of master’s theses written by two Chinese EFL (English as a foreign language) graduate students, this case study investigated changes in their authorial voices and the roles of advisor feedback in this process. We drew on three types of data: analysis of multiple thesis drafts for linguistic and content features of voice; advisor feedback on multiple drafts; and a questionnaire for the student writers’ understanding of authorial voice. The results indicate that the linguistic features of voice in their theses have remained largely unchanged, portraying them as unconfident student writers, but the content features have shown significant improvement, conveying authorial voices of novice researchers in the later drafts. Most of the student revisions followed their advisors’ feedback. The student participants’ questionnaire responses indicate their relative lack of awareness of the importance of language in voice construction. The results suggest that the authorial voice construction of the novice student writers is dynamic, developmental, and interactive with their advisors’ feedback over the thesis writing process. Pedagogically, other than feedback on content features of voice, classroom practitioners could also consider providing explicit instruction of and feedback on linguistic features to help students construct authoritative authorial voice in the academic context.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhao & Yingliang Liu, 2021. "A Developmental View of Authorial Voice Construction in Master’s Thesis: A Case Study of Two Novice L2 Writers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054483
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211054483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211054483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211054483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Lei & Guangwei Hu, 2015. "Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles," Publications, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Editorial Article, 0. "Abstracts," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindner, Robert K. & Pardey, Philip G. & Jarrett, Frank G., 1982. "Distance To Information Source And The Time Lag To Early Adoption Of Trace Element Fertilisers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(2), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Sergio Copiello, 2020. "Digital multimedia tools, research impact, stated and revealed preferences: a rejoinder on the issue of video abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 543-551, April.
    3. Kocsis, David, 2019. "A conceptual foundation of design and implementation research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Tladi-Sekgwama, Flora & Ntseane, Gabo P., 2020. "Promoting Sustainable Development in Rural Communities: The Role of the University of Botswana," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2).
    5. Irina Shcheglova & Yulia Koreshnikova & Olga Parshina, 2019. "The Role of Engagement in the Development of Critical Thinking in Undergraduates," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 264-289.
    6. Ron Martinez & Karin Graf, 2016. "Thesis Supervisors as Literacy Brokers in Brazil," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, August.
    7. repec:mpr:mprres:7840 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Abdulwahid Qasem Al Zumor, 2021. "Exploring Intricacies in English Passive Construction Translation in Research Articles’ Abstracts by Arab Author-Translators," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    9. Leonello, Agnese, 2017. "Government guarantees and the bank-sovereign nexus," Research Bulletin, European Central Bank, vol. 35.
    10. Simina Stanc & Mihaela Danu & Dorel Paraschiv & Luminița Bejenaru, 2020. "Bioarcheological Indicators Related to Human–Environmental Interactions in a Roman–Byzantine Settlement in Southeast Romania: Ibida Fortress," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    11. Seden Can & Erkan Karabacak & Jingjing Qin, 2016. "Structure of Moves in Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Amare Tesfie Birhan, 2021. "An exploration of metadiscourse usage in book review articles across three academic disciplines: a contrastive analysis of corpus-based research approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2885-2902, April.
    13. Kai Li & Jason Rollins & Erjia Yan, 2018. "Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Wirada Amnuai, 2019. "Analyses of Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realizations in Accounting Research Article Abstracts Published in International and Thai-Based Journals," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    15. Svitlana Hanaba & Olena Voitiuk & Nataliia Goliardyk, 2020. "Methodological Potential of the Complexity Concept in Education Modernization," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(2Sup1), pages 238-254, September.
    16. Matthias Aistleitner & Stephan Puehringer, 2020. "Exploring the trade (policy) narratives in economic elite discourse," ICAE Working Papers 110, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    17. Cita Nuary Ishak & Yazid Basthomi & Utami Widiati & Maria Hidayati & Nurenzia Yannuar, 2021. "See: How Indonesian Student Writers Use Directives in Academic Texts," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 65-76.
    18. Yongyan Li & Patrick O’Connor, 2019. "“Scientific Writing for Impact Is a Learned Skill—It Can Be Enhanced with Training”: An Interview with Patrick O’Connor," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, March.
    19. World Bank, 2014. "Brazil Land Governance Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 22679, The World Bank Group.
    20. Shaoliang Xie, 2020. "Multidimensional analysis of Master thesis abstracts: a diachronic perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 861-881, May.
    21. Frederique Bordignon, 2021. "A scientometric review of permafrost research based on textual analysis (1948–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 417-436, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    academic writing; novice L2 writers; master’s thesis; authorial voice construction; advisor feedback;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.