IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i3p416-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method for transformation from dynamic fault tree to binary decision diagram

Author

Listed:
  • Haiyue Yu
  • Xiaoyue Wu

Abstract

Dynamic fault tree (DFT) is a powerful modeling approach for reliability analysis of complex system with dynamic failure behaviors. In reality, the tree structure may be highly coupled either by shared basic events or by the high-level dynamic gates. Currently, the application of sequential binary decision diagram (SBDD)-based method for quantitative analysis of such highly coupled DFTs is mainly limited to DFTs whose dynamic gates locate in the bottom of the tree. Moreover, there is no efficient way dealing with the dependencies among different nodes of a SBDD 1-path. This paper makes an improvement to the SBDD-based approach. A generation procedure is proposed to directly construct the binary decision diagram (BDD) model for a DFT with arbitrary tree structure. During the construction, the sequential-dependent information of the tree is derived as several BDD nodes, each indicates a binary-sequential event representing the sequence of two occurred basic events. A topological sorting is applied on each 1-path of the resultant BDD to obtain its contained disjoint cut sequences. Based on this, both qualitative and quantitative analysis can be performed on the DFT with no limitations on tree structure, and its minimal cut sequence set (CSS) is obtained as disjoint. Examples are provided for verification and comparison, and the results illustrate the merits of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiyue Yu & Xiaoyue Wu, 2021. "A method for transformation from dynamic fault tree to binary decision diagram," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 416-430, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:3:p:416-430
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20974187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20974187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20974187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing, Liudong & Shrestha, Akhilesh & Dai, Yuanshun, 2011. "Exact combinatorial reliability analysis of dynamic systems with sequence-dependent failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1375-1385.
    2. Chiacchio, F. & Cacioppo, M. & D'Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Trapani, N. & Compagno, L., 2013. "A Weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 45-52.
    3. Durga Rao, K. & Gopika, V. & Sanyasi Rao, V.V.S. & Kushwaha, H.S. & Verma, A.K. & Srividya, A., 2009. "Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 872-883.
    4. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    5. Merle, G. & Roussel, J.-M. & Lesage, J.-J., 2011. "Algebraic determination of the structure function of Dynamic Fault Trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 267-277.
    6. Daochuan Ge & Yanhua Yang, 2015. "Reliability analysis of non‐repairable systems modeled by dynamic fault trees with priority AND gates," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 809-822, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Xing & Du, Hengte & Yu, Haofan, 2024. "A method for safety analysis of human-machine systems based on dynamic Bayesian simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    2. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    4. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    5. Daochuan Ge & Ruoxing Zhang & Qiang Chou & Yanhua Yang, 2015. "Probabilistic model–based multi-integration formulas for quantifying a generalized minimal cut sequence," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(1), pages 73-82, February.
    6. Zhou, Siwei & Ye, Luyao & Xiong, Shengwu & Xiang, Jianwen, 2022. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates based on irrelevance coverage model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    8. Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Faure, Jean-Marc & Lesage, Jean-Jacques, 2017. "Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Processes: A powerful modeling framework for Model-Based Safety Analysis of dynamic repairable and reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 57-68.
    9. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Lin, Zhixian & Tao, Longlong & Wang, Shaoxuan & Yong, Nuo & Xia, Dongqin & Wang, Jianye & Ge, Daochuan, 2024. "A subset simulation analysis framework for rapid reliability evaluation of series-parallel cold standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Daochuan Ge & Meng Lin & Yanhua Yang & Ruoxing Zhang & Qiang Chou, 2015. "Reliability analysis of complex dynamic fault trees based on an adapted K.D. Heidtmann algorithm," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 576-586, December.
    12. Nguyen, T.P. Khanh & Beugin, Julie & Marais, Juliette, 2015. "Method for evaluating an extended Fault Tree to analyse the dependability of complex systems: Application to a satellite-based railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 300-313.
    13. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Iacono, Alessandra & Compagno, Lucio & D'Urso, Diego, 2020. "A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Janssen, Hans, 2013. "Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 123-132.
    17. Yu, Shui & Wang, Zhonglai & Zhang, Kewang, 2018. "Sequential time-dependent reliability analysis for the lower extremity exoskeleton under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 45-52.
    18. Lindhe, Andreas & Norberg, Tommy & Rosén, Lars, 2012. "Approximate dynamic fault tree calculations for modelling water supply risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 61-71.
    19. Azeem Ali & Sanku Dey & Haseeb Ur Rehman & Zeeshan Ali, 2019. "On Bayesian reliability estimation of a 1-out-of-k load sharing system model of modified Burr-III distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 1052-1081, October.
    20. Chenxi Liu & Nan Chen & Jianing Yang, 2015. "New method for multi-state system reliability analysis based on linear algebraic representation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 469-482, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:3:p:416-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.