IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v109y2013icp45-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees

Author

Listed:
  • Chiacchio, F.
  • Cacioppo, M.
  • D'Urso, D.
  • Manno, G.
  • Trapani, N.
  • Compagno, L.

Abstract

The solution of a dynamic fault tree (DFT) for the reliability assessment can be achieved using a wide variety of techniques. These techniques have a strong theoretical foundation as both the analytical and the simulation methods have been extensively developed. Nevertheless, they all present the same limits that appear with the increasing of the size of the fault trees (i.e., state space explosion, time-consuming simulations), compromising the resolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiacchio, F. & Cacioppo, M. & D'Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Trapani, N. & Compagno, L., 2013. "A Weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 45-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:109:y:2013:i:c:p:45-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832012001494
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiacchio, F. & Compagno, L. & D'Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Trapani, N., 2011. "Dynamic fault trees resolution: A conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1515-1526.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haiyue Yu & Xiaoyue Wu, 2021. "A method for transformation from dynamic fault tree to binary decision diagram," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 416-430, June.
    2. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    3. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    4. Dranev Yury & Maxim Babushkin, 2014. "Asymmetric exchange-rate exposure in BRIC countries," HSE Working papers WP BRP 27/FE/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    7. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    2. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    3. Sejin Baek & Gyunyoung Heo, 2021. "Application of Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis to Prioritize Electric Power Systems in Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Manno, G. & Chiacchio, F. & Compagno, L. & D'Urso, D. & Trapani, N., 2014. "Conception of Repairable Dynamic Fault Trees and resolution by the use of RAATSS, a Matlab® toolbox based on the ATS formalism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 250-262.
    5. Raoni, Rafael & Secchi, Argimiro R., 2019. "Procedures to model and solve probabilistic dynamic system problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Muchiri, Peter, 2015. "Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 663-676.
    7. Son, Kwang Seop & Kim, Dong Hoon & Kim, Chang Hwoi & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2016. "Study on the systematic approach of Markov modeling for dependability analysis of complex fault-tolerant features with voting logics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 44-57.
    8. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    10. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Iacono, Alessandra & Compagno, Lucio & D'Urso, Diego, 2020. "A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:109:y:2013:i:c:p:45-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.