IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v253y2025ics0951832024005672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates using conditional binary decision diagrams

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Siwei
  • Li, Zhao
  • Xiang, Jianwen

Abstract

The conditional binary decision diagram (CBDD) is an extension of the BDD by introducing the conditioning event node, which has been applied to analyze the reliability of the dynamic fault tree (DFT). However, the previous CBDD-based method is limited to the DFT with spare gates since the Boolean conditioning event only describes the replacement state in spare gates. Hence, it cannot be available for the DFT with Priority-AND (PAND) gates. To address this issue, a novel Boolean conditioning event is proposed to describe the sequence-dependence failure in the dynamic system modeled by the DFT with PAND gates. A DFT with complex PAND gates can be converted into a conditional fault tree (CFT) by recursively applying derived rules that are based on the proposed conditioning event. As a result, the minimal cut set replaces the minimal cut sequence for qualitative analysis, which can reduce the average space complexity in a general case. Then, the CBDD can be generated based on the CFT and it can be used for evaluation. Finally, case studies demonstrate an extension of the cold spare gate and the advantages of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Siwei & Li, Zhao & Xiang, Jianwen, 2025. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates using conditional binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024005672
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005672
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024005672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.