IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i4p567-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An importance order analysis method for causes of railway signaling system hazards based on complex networks

Author

Listed:
  • Jintao Liu
  • Keping Li
  • Wei Zheng
  • Jiebei Zhu

Abstract

The importance order of causes of a railway signaling system hazard is important for the arrangement of control measures for eliminating or controlling the system hazard. In order to obtain a reasonable importance order, a novel importance order analysis method based on complex networks is proposed in this article. In this article, to characterize the causes from a topological perspective, a comprehensive topology characteristic is proposed. It is built on the top of three typical topology characteristics with the weighted Euclidean distance. Then, an influence coefficient matrix is proposed to measure the causal influence between causes. Based on the proposed topology characteristic and matrix, an algorithm is designed to identify the importance order of causes. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, a case study on a Chinese high-speed railway signaling system hazard is performed. The results show that the proposed method is feasible for the arrangement of control measures to eliminate or control system hazards and performs better than the traditional complex network-based methods in terms of avoiding conflicting and rough results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jintao Liu & Keping Li & Wei Zheng & Jiebei Zhu, 2019. "An importance order analysis method for causes of railway signaling system hazards based on complex networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 567-579, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:567-579
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18807785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18807785
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18807785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2010. "Ideas and developments in importance measures and fault-tree techniques for reliability and risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 99-107.
    2. Zhou, Jin & Xu, Weixiang & Guo, Xin & Ding, Jing, 2015. "A method for modeling and analysis of directed weighted accident causation network (DWACN)," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 263-277.
    3. Kim, Jaehoon & Jeong, Hyun- Yong, 2013. "Evaluation of the adequacy of maintenance tasks using the failure consequences of railroad vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 30-39.
    4. Leveson, Nancy, 2015. "A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 17-34.
    5. Keping Li & Xin Ma & Fubo Shao, 2017. "An improved network model for railway traffic," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(03), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Jian-Lan & Lei, Yi, 2020. "A slim integrated with empirical study and network analysis for human error assessment in the railway driving process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    2. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    3. Zhang, Hengqi & Geng, Hua, 2023. "A methodology to identify and assess high-risk causes for electrical personal accidents based on directed weighted CN," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Khastgir, Siddartha & Brewerton, Simon & Thomas, John & Jennings, Paul, 2021. "Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Bryan, Mark & Bryce, Andrew & Rice, Nigel & Roberts, Jennifer & Sechel, Cristina, 2022. "Exploring mental health disability gaps in the labour market: the UK experience during COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2011. "Importance measures in risk-informed decision making: Ranking, optimisation and configuration control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1426-1436.
    7. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    8. Antonovsky, A. & Pollock, C. & Straker, L., 2016. "System reliability as perceived by maintenance personnel on petroleum production facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 58-65.
    9. Suo Qi & Wang Liyuan & Yao Tianzi & Wang Zihao, 2021. "Promoting Metro Operation Safety by Exploring Metro Operation Accident Network," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 455-468, August.
    10. Faiella, Giuliana & Parand, Anam & Franklin, Bryony Dean & Chana, Prem & Cesarelli, Mario & Stanton, Neville A. & Sevdalis, Nick, 2018. "Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-126.
    11. Kawahara, Jun & Sonoda, Koki & Inoue, Takeru & Kasahara, Shoji, 2019. "Efficient construction of binary decision diagrams for network reliability with imperfect vertices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 142-154.
    12. Nicolae Brînzei & Jean-François Aubry, 2018. "Graphs models and algorithms for reliability assessment of coherent and non-coherent systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 201-215, April.
    13. Berner, Christine Louise & Flage, Roger, 2017. "Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 10-19.
    14. Guo, Shengyu & Zhou, Xinyu & Tang, Bing & Gong, Peisong, 2020. "Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    15. Vaurio, J.K., 2011. "Importance measures for multi-phase missions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 230-235.
    16. Ahmad Dehghan Nejad & Amirhosein Bahramzadeh, 2021. "The competency of organizational safety control structure; a framework for evaluation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1180-1198, December.
    17. Wu, Chao & Huang, Lang, 2019. "A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-85.
    18. Read, G.J.M. & Naweed, A. & Salmon, P.M., 2019. "Complexity on the rails: A systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 352-365.
    19. Reza Mikaeil & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Zoheir Sedaghati, 2019. "Geotechnical risk evaluation of tunneling projects using optimization techniques (case study: the second part of Emamzade Hashem tunnel)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1099-1113, July.
    20. Thieme, Christoph A. & Utne, Ingrid B., 2017. "Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 264-275.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:567-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.