IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i2p201-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graphs models and algorithms for reliability assessment of coherent and non-coherent systems

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae Brînzei
  • Jean-François Aubry

Abstract

In this article, we propose new models and algorithms for the reliability assessment of systems relying on concepts of graphs theory. These developments exploit the order relation on the set of system components’ states which is graphically represented by the Hasse diagram. The monotony property of the reliability structure function of coherent systems allows us to obtain an ordered graph from the Hasse diagram. This ordered graph represents all the system states and it can be obtained from only the knowledge of the system tie-sets. First of all, this model gives a new way for the research of a minimal disjoint Boolean polynomial, and, second, it is able to directly find the system reliability without resorting to an intermediate Boolean polynomial. Browsing the paths from the minimal tie-sets to the maxima of the ordered graph and using a weight associated with each node, we are able to propose a new algorithm to directly obtain the reliability polynomial by the research of sub-graphs representing eligible monomials. This approach is then extended to non-coherent systems thanks to the introduction of a new concept of terminal tie-sets. These algorithms are applied to some case studies, for both coherent and non-coherent real systems, and the results compared with those computed using standard reliability block diagram or fault tree models validate the proposed approach. Formal definitions of used graphs and of developed algorithms are also given, making their software implementation easy and efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae Brînzei & Jean-François Aubry, 2018. "Graphs models and algorithms for reliability assessment of coherent and non-coherent systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 201-215, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:2:p:201-215
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17744381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17744381
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17744381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung, Woo Sik, 2015. "A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 134-142.
    2. Gregory Levitin, 2005. "The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-245-4, March.
    3. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    4. Remenyte-Prescott, R. & Andrews, J.D., 2008. "An enhanced component connection method for conversion of fault trees to binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1543-1550.
    5. Francesco Di Maio & Samuele Baronchelli & Enrico Zio, 2015. "A Computational Framework for Prime Implicants Identification in Noncoherent Dynamic Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 142-156, January.
    6. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2021. "A quick BAT for evaluating the reliability of binary-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Zhao, Xian & He, Zongda & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based performance control and maintenance policies for mission-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Hausken, Kjell & Levitin, Gregory, 2009. "Minmax defense strategy for complex multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 577-587.
    4. Yeh, Wei-Chang & Bae, Changseok & Huang, Chia-Ling, 2015. "A new cut-based algorithm for the multi-state flow network reliability problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-7.
    5. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    6. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Ait-Kadi, Daoud, 2007. "Optimization of series–parallel multi-state systems under maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1620-1626.
    7. Bigatti, A.M. & Pascual-Ortigosa, P. & Sáenz-de-Cabezón, E., 2021. "A C++ class for multi-state algebraic reliability computations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Jia, Heping & Ding, Yi & Peng, Rui & Liu, Hanlin & Song, Yonghua, 2020. "Reliability assessment and activation sequence optimization of non-repairable multi-state generation systems considering warm standby," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Lu, Shaoqi & Shi, Daimin & Xiao, Hui, 2019. "Reliability of sliding window systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 366-376.
    10. Peng, Rui & Xiao, Hui & Liu, Hanlin, 2017. "Reliability of multi-state systems with a performance sharing group of limited size," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 164-170.
    11. Bo, Yimin & Bao, Minglei & Ding, Yi & Hu, Yishuang, 2024. "A DNN-based reliability evaluation method for multi-state series-parallel systems considering semi-Markov process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2017. "Evaluation of the one-to-all-target-subsets reliability of a novel deterioration-effect acyclic multi-state information network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 132-137.
    13. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2013. "Cold-standby sequencing optimization considering mission cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 28-34.
    14. Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Jiang, Tao, 2020. "Dynamic selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems over a finite horizon: A deep reinforcement learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 166-181.
    15. Zio, E. & Bazzo, R., 2011. "Level Diagrams analysis of Pareto Front for multiobjective system redundancy allocation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 569-580.
    16. Niu, Yi-Feng & Gao, Zi-You & Lam, William H.K., 2017. "A new efficient algorithm for finding all d-minimal cuts in multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 151-163.
    17. Nahas, Nabil & Khatab, Abdelhakim & Ait-Kadi, Daoud & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2008. "Extended great deluge algorithm for the imperfect preventive maintenance optimization of multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1658-1672.
    18. Yeh, Wei-Chang & Chu, Ta-Chung, 2018. "A novel multi-distribution multi-state flow network and its reliability optimization problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 209-217.
    19. Bellaera, R. & Bonifetto, R. & Di Maio, F. & Pedroni, N. & Savoldi, L. & Zanino, R. & Zio, E., 2020. "Integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment of a superconducting magnet cryogenic cooling circuit for nuclear fusion applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Kawahara, Jun & Sonoda, Koki & Inoue, Takeru & Kasahara, Shoji, 2019. "Efficient construction of binary decision diagrams for network reliability with imperfect vertices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 142-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:2:p:201-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.