IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v228y2014i3p313-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance factors of coherent systems: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Dutuit
  • Antoine Rauzy

Abstract

Importance factors are indicators of the risk significance of the components of a system. They are widely used in probabilistic safety analyses to rank components according to their contribution to the global risk. In this article, we review definitions and interpretations of importance factors in the case the support model is a coherent fault tree, and failures of components are described by basic events of that fault tree. First, we show that each importance factor characterizes the probability of a certain set of minterms. The notion of critical states, that is, minterms in which failing/repairing the component suffices to fail/repair the system, plays a central role in this process. Then, we discuss assessment algorithms for the two main technologies at hand: minimal cutsets and binary decision diagrams. Finally, we draw some practical conclusions from these developments. This article thus contributes to clarify mathematical and algorithmic foundations of importance factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Dutuit & Antoine Rauzy, 2014. "Importance factors of coherent systems: A review," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(3), pages 313-323, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:3:p:313-323
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13512296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13512296
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13512296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barlow, Richard E. & Proschan, Frank, 1975. "Importance of system components and fault tree events," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 153-173, April.
    2. Contini, Sergio & Matuzas, Vaidas, 2011. "Analysis of large fault trees based on functional decomposition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 383-390.
    3. Natvig, Bent, 1979. "A suggestion of a new measure of importance of system components," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 319-330, December.
    4. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2010. "Ideas and developments in importance measures and fault-tree techniques for reliability and risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 99-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutuit, Yves & Rauzy, Antoine, 2015. "On the extension of Importance Measures to complex components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 161-168.
    2. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Wu, Shaomin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "An importance measure for multistate systems with external factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 49-57.
    3. Li, Ruiying & Gao, Ying, 2022. "On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    4. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Importance measures in reliability and mathematical programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 241-267, January.
    6. Si, Shubin & Levitin, Gregory & Dui, Hongyan & Sun, Shudong, 2013. "Component state-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 75-83.
    7. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    8. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    9. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.
    10. Natvig, Bent & Eide, Kristina A. & Gåsemyr, Jørund & Huseby, Arne B. & Isaksen, Stefan L., 2009. "Simulation based analysis and an application to an offshore oil and gas production system of the Natvig measures of component importance in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1629-1638.
    11. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    12. Huseby, Arne B. & Natvig, Bent, 2013. "Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 186-198.
    13. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    14. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Frenkel, Ilia & Khvatskin, Lev, 2015. "On Birnbaum importance assessment for aging multi-state system under minimal repair by using the Lz-transform method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 258-266.
    15. Mario Hellmich & Heinz-Peter Berg, 2013. "On the construction of component importance measures for semi-Markov systems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(1), pages 15-32, February.
    16. Natvig, Bent & Huseby, Arne B. & Reistadbakk, Mads O., 2011. "Measures of component importance in repairable multistate systems—a numerical study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1680-1690.
    17. Miroslav Kvassay & Vitaly Levashenko & Elena Zaitseva, 2016. "Analysis of minimal cut and path sets based on direct partial Boolean derivatives," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(2), pages 147-161, April.
    18. Bent Natvig & Jørund Gåsemyr, 2009. "New Results on the Barlow–Proschan and Natvig Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 603-620, December.
    19. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2013. "Component importance for linear consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n and m ‐Consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 313-320, June.
    20. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2011. "Importance measures in risk-informed decision making: Ranking, optimisation and configuration control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1426-1436.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:3:p:313-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.