IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v11y2009i4d10.1007_s11009-008-9079-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Results on the Barlow–Proschan and Natvig Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bent Natvig

    (University of Oslo)

  • Jørund Gåsemyr

    (University of Oslo)

Abstract

In this paper dynamic and stationary measures of importance of a component in a binary system are considered. To arrive at explicit results we assume the performance processes of the components to be independent and the system to be coherent. Especially, the Barlow–Proschan and the Natvig measures are treated in detail and a series of new results and approaches are given. For the case of components not undergoing repair it is shown that both measures are sensible. Reasonable measures of component importance for repairable systems represent a challenge. A basic idea here is also to take a so-called dual term into account. According to the extended Barlow–Proschan measure a component is important if there are high probabilities both that its failure is the cause of system failure and that its repair is the cause of system repair. Even with this extension results for the stationary Barlow–Proschan measure are not satisfactory. According to the extended Natvig measure a component is important if both by failing it strongly reduces the expected system uptime and by being repaired it strongly reduces the expected system downtime. With this extension the results for the stationary Natvig measure seem very sensible.

Suggested Citation

  • Bent Natvig & Jørund Gåsemyr, 2009. "New Results on the Barlow–Proschan and Natvig Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 603-620, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:11:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1007_s11009-008-9079-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-008-9079-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-008-9079-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-008-9079-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jørund Gåsemyr & Bent Natvig, 2005. "Probabilistic Modelling of Monitoring and Maintenance of Multistate Monotone Systems with Dependent Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 63-78, March.
    2. Natvig, Bent, 1979. "A suggestion of a new measure of importance of system components," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 319-330, December.
    3. Barlow, Richard E. & Proschan, Frank, 1975. "Importance of system components and fault tree events," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 153-173, April.
    4. Jørund Gåsemyr & Bent Natvig, 1995. "Using Expert Opinions in Bayesian Prediction of Component Lifetimes in a Shock Model," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 227-242, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    2. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.
    3. Natvig, Bent & Eide, Kristina A. & Gåsemyr, Jørund & Huseby, Arne B. & Isaksen, Stefan L., 2009. "Simulation based analysis and an application to an offshore oil and gas production system of the Natvig measures of component importance in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1629-1638.
    4. Li, Ruiying & Gao, Ying, 2022. "On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    5. Huseby, Arne B. & Natvig, Bent, 2013. "Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 186-198.
    6. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Wu, Shaomin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "An importance measure for multistate systems with external factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 49-57.
    8. Dutuit, Yves & Rauzy, Antoine, 2015. "On the extension of Importance Measures to complex components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 161-168.
    9. Yves Dutuit & Antoine Rauzy, 2014. "Importance factors of coherent systems: A review," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(3), pages 313-323, June.
    10. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Frenkel, Ilia & Khvatskin, Lev, 2015. "On Birnbaum importance assessment for aging multi-state system under minimal repair by using the Lz-transform method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 258-266.
    11. Mario Hellmich & Heinz-Peter Berg, 2013. "On the construction of component importance measures for semi-Markov systems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(1), pages 15-32, February.
    12. Natvig, Bent & Huseby, Arne B. & Reistadbakk, Mads O., 2011. "Measures of component importance in repairable multistate systems—a numerical study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1680-1690.
    13. Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Importance measures in reliability and mathematical programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 241-267, January.
    14. Si, Shubin & Levitin, Gregory & Dui, Hongyan & Sun, Shudong, 2013. "Component state-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 75-83.
    15. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    16. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2013. "Component importance for linear consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n and m ‐Consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 313-320, June.
    17. Navarro, Jorge & Arriaza, Antonio & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2019. "Minimal repair of failed components in coherent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 951-964.
    18. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    19. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre, 2013. "On the extensions of Barlow–Proschan importance index and system signature to dependent lifetimes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-56.
    20. Fu, Yuqiang & Yuan, Tao & Zhu, Xiaoyan, 2019. "Importance-measure based methods for component reassignment problem of degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:11:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1007_s11009-008-9079-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.