IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v142y2015icp258-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Birnbaum importance assessment for aging multi-state system under minimal repair by using the Lz-transform method

Author

Listed:
  • Lisnianski, Anatoly
  • Frenkel, Ilia
  • Khvatskin, Lev

Abstract

This paper considers a reliability importance evaluation for components in an aging multi-state system. In practical reliability engineering a “curse of dimensionality†(the large number of states that should be analyzed for a multi-state system model) is a main obstacle for importance assessment. In order to challenge the problem, this paper proposes a new method that is based on an LZ-transform of the discrete-state continuous-time Markov process and on Ushakov׳s Universal Generating Operator. The paper shows that the proposed method can drastically reduce a computational burden. In order to illustrate the method, a solution of a real world problem is presented as a numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisnianski, Anatoly & Frenkel, Ilia & Khvatskin, Lev, 2015. "On Birnbaum importance assessment for aging multi-state system under minimal repair by using the Lz-transform method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 258-266.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:258-266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015001477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.
    2. Huseby, Arne B. & Natvig, Bent, 2013. "Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 186-198.
    3. Gregory Levitin, 2005. "The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-245-4, September.
    4. Natvig, Bent, 1979. "A suggestion of a new measure of importance of system components," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 319-330, December.
    5. Barlow, Richard E. & Proschan, Frank, 1975. "Importance of system components and fault tree events," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 153-173, April.
    6. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Ding, Yi, 2009. "Redundancy analysis for repairable multi-state system by using combined stochastic processes methods and universal generating function technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1788-1795.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Jiang, Tao, 2018. "On sequence planning for selective maintenance of multi-state systems under stochastic maintenance durations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 113-127.
    2. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Levit, Evgeniy & Teper, Lina, 2021. "Short-term availability and performability analysis for a large-scale multi-state system based on robotic sensors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2017. "Optimal arrangement of connecting elements in linear consecutively connected systems with heterogeneous warm standby groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 395-401.
    4. Cai, Zhiqiang & Si, Shubin & Sun, Shudong & Li, Caitao, 2016. "Optimization of linear consecutive-k-out-of-n system with a Birnbaum importance-based genetic algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 248-258.
    5. Wu, Bei & Cui, Lirong & Fang, Chen, 2020. "Multi-state balanced systems with multiple failure criteria," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2017. "Optimal loading of series parallel systems with arbitrary element time-to-failure and time-to-repair distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 34-44.
    7. Vaisman, Radislav & Sun, Yuting, 2021. "Reliability and importance measure analysis of networks with shared risk link groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Xianzhen Huang & Frank PA Coolen, 2018. "Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 627-634, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huseby, Arne B. & Natvig, Bent, 2013. "Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 186-198.
    2. Mario Hellmich & Heinz-Peter Berg, 2013. "On the construction of component importance measures for semi-Markov systems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(1), pages 15-32, February.
    3. Natvig, Bent & Huseby, Arne B. & Reistadbakk, Mads O., 2011. "Measures of component importance in repairable multistate systems—a numerical study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1680-1690.
    4. Si, Shubin & Levitin, Gregory & Dui, Hongyan & Sun, Shudong, 2013. "Component state-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 75-83.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    6. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2013. "Component importance for linear consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n and m ‐Consecutive‐ k ‐Out‐of‐ n systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 313-320, June.
    7. Tian, Tianzi & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei & Wang, Ning, 2023. "Reliability assessment of performance-based balanced systems with rebalancing mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Chen, Yiming & Liu, Yu & Jiang, Tao, 2021. "Optimal maintenance strategy for multi-state systems with single maintenance capacity and arbitrarily distributed maintenance time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    10. Peng, Rui & Xiao, Hui & Liu, Hanlin, 2017. "Reliability of multi-state systems with a performance sharing group of limited size," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 164-170.
    11. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.
    12. Wang, Guanjun & Duan, Fengjun & Zhou, Yifan, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of multi-state series systems with performance sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 58-63.
    13. Peng, Rui & Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Optimal structure of multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 18-25.
    14. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Huang, Hong Zhong, 2019. "Dynamic availability and performance deficiency of common bus systems with imperfectly repairable components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 58-66.
    15. Natvig, Bent & Eide, Kristina A. & Gåsemyr, Jørund & Huseby, Arne B. & Isaksen, Stefan L., 2009. "Simulation based analysis and an application to an offshore oil and gas production system of the Natvig measures of component importance in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1629-1638.
    16. Li, Ruiying & Gao, Ying, 2022. "On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    17. Xiao, Hui & Shi, Daimin & Ding, Yi & Peng, Rui, 2016. "Optimal loading and protection of multi-state systems considering performance sharing mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 88-95.
    18. Zhao, Xian & Han, He & Jiao, Chunhui & Qiu, Qingan, 2024. "Reliability modeling of k-out-of-n: F balanced systems with common bus performance sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    19. Gu, Liudong & Wang, Guanjun & Zhou, Yifan, 2024. "Optimal allocation of multi-state performance sharing systems with multiple common buses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    20. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:258-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.