IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v230y2016i2p147-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of minimal cut and path sets based on direct partial Boolean derivatives

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Kvassay
  • Vitaly Levashenko
  • Elena Zaitseva

Abstract

Principal steps in reliability engineering include estimation of system reliability and identification and quantification of situations which cause a system failure. There are several techniques that can be used to solve these tasks. Some of them are based on minimal cut (path) sets, which represent minimal sets of basic events, whose simultaneous occurrence leads to a failure (repair) of the system. In this article, applications of minimal cut (path) sets in reliability analysis are summarized, and their connection with direct partial Boolean derivatives is studied. In reliability analysis, direct partial Boolean derivatives identify situations in which a failure (repair) of one system component results in a system failure (repair). Therefore, they reveal the influence of one system component on the whole system. However, minimal cut (path) sets define the influence of a simultaneous failure (repair) of a group of system components on the system activity. Therefore, there should be some correlation between direct partial Boolean derivatives and minimal cut (path) sets. This correlation is studied in this article, and as a result, new algorithms for identification of minimal cut (path) sets are proposed based on this correlation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Kvassay & Vitaly Levashenko & Elena Zaitseva, 2016. "Analysis of minimal cut and path sets based on direct partial Boolean derivatives," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(2), pages 147-161, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:2:p:147-161
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X15598722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X15598722
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X15598722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneeweiss, Winfrid G., 2009. "A short Boolean derivation of mean failure frequency for any (also non-coherent) system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1363-1367.
    2. Barlow, Richard E. & Proschan, Frank, 1975. "Importance of system components and fault tree events," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 153-173, April.
    3. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2006. "A new algorithm for generating minimal cut sets in k-out-of-n networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 36-43.
    4. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2008. "An improved algorithm for searching all minimal cuts in modified networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 1018-1024.
    5. Contini, Sergio & Matuzas, Vaidas, 2011. "Analysis of large fault trees based on functional decomposition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 383-390.
    6. Haarla, Liisa & Pulkkinen, Urho & Koskinen, Mikko & Jyrinsalo, Jussi, 2008. "A method for analysing the reliability of a transmission grid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 277-287.
    7. Choi, Jong Soo & Cho, Nam Zin, 2007. "A practical method for accurate quantification of large fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 971-982.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kawahara, Jun & Sonoda, Koki & Inoue, Takeru & Kasahara, Shoji, 2019. "Efficient construction of binary decision diagrams for network reliability with imperfect vertices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 142-154.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    2. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2020. "A new method for verifying d-MC candidates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Yves Dutuit & Antoine Rauzy, 2014. "Importance factors of coherent systems: A review," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(3), pages 313-323, June.
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    5. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    6. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre, 2013. "On the extensions of Barlow–Proschan importance index and system signature to dependent lifetimes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-56.
    7. Azzolin, Alberto & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Cadini, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Electrical and topological drivers of the cascading failure dynamics in power transmission networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 196-206.
    8. Ortega-Jiménez, P. & Sordo, M.A. & Suárez-Llorens, A., 2021. "Stochastic orders and multivariate measures of risk contagion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 199-207.
    9. Bent Natvig, 2011. "Measures of Component Importance in Nonrepairable and Repairable Multistate Strongly Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 523-547, September.
    10. Gao, Xueli & Cui, Lirong & Li, Jinlin, 2007. "Analysis for joint importance of components in a coherent system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 282-299, October.
    11. Lin, Yi-Kuei & Yeh, Cheng-Ta, 2011. "Maximal network reliability for a stochastic power transmission network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1332-1339.
    12. Matuzas, V. & Contini, S., 2015. "Dynamic labelling of BDD and ZBDD for efficient non-coherent fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 183-192.
    13. Lyu, Dong & Si, Shubin, 2021. "Importance measure for K-out-of-n: G systems under dynamic random load considering strength degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    14. Natvig, Bent & Eide, Kristina A. & Gåsemyr, Jørund & Huseby, Arne B. & Isaksen, Stefan L., 2009. "Simulation based analysis and an application to an offshore oil and gas production system of the Natvig measures of component importance in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1629-1638.
    15. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    16. Masry, Elias, 2003. "Local polynomial fitting under association," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 330-359, August.
    17. Dong Lyu & Shubin Si & Zhiqiang Cai & Liyang Xie, 2020. "Computational method for importance measure of the k-out-of-n system based on stress–strength interference," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 27-40, February.
    18. Briš, Radim, 2010. "Exact reliability quantification of highly reliable systems with maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1286-1292.
    19. Li, Ruiying & Gao, Ying, 2022. "On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    20. Huseby, Arne B. & Natvig, Bent, 2013. "Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 186-198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:2:p:147-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.