IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v36y2021i7-8p650-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hubs, hopes and high stakes for a relatively disadvantaged low tech place

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Rundel
  • Koen Salemink

Abstract

The transition to a digitally inclusive and knowledge-based rural society can be challenging. Digital hubs are often proposed as a way of overcoming digital exclusion in rural and small-town contexts, yet studies into how to set up such a hub in these challenging contexts are scarce. While hubs are usually associated with an urban environment, this case study deals with the development of a rural digital hub over several years in a small town in East Groningen (NL). In the context of an Interreg project, observations during project meetings, in-depth interviews and document analysis were conducted to closely monitor the hub’s development process. Initially, the hub initiators aimed at stimulating business activities and innovation linked to digital technologies. Thereby, an originally urban digital hub concept was copied into a rural context without a rural translation. Along the way, they were forced to adapt and scale down the scope of the project while at the same time, a broader target group had to be formulated. Moreover, the municipality lacked an overarching digital strategy, which compromised demand aggregation and supply synchronisation – two essential ingredients for rural digital hubs.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Rundel & Koen Salemink, 2021. "Hubs, hopes and high stakes for a relatively disadvantaged low tech place," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 650-668, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:7-8:p:650-668
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942221077120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942221077120
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942221077120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Bosworth & Liz Price & Martin Collison & Charles Fox, 2020. "Unequal futures of rural mobility: Challenges for a “Smart Countrysideâ€," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(6), pages 586-608, September.
    2. Luiz de Mello & Teresa Ter-Minassian, 2020. "Digitalisation challenges and opportunities for subnational governments," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 31, OECD Publishing.
    3. Jari Kolehmainen & Joe Irvine & Linda Stewart & Zoltan Karacsonyi & Tünde Szabó & Juha Alarinta & Anders Norberg, 2016. "Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 23-42, March.
    4. Yasmine Willi, Marco P tz, Heike Mayer, 2018. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Regional Development," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper21, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    5. Artur da Rosa Pires & Martina Pertoldi & John Edwards & Fatime Barbara Hegyi, 2014. "Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas," JRC Research Reports JRC90000, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adelheid Holl & Ruth Rama, 2024. "Spatial Patterns and Drivers of SME Digitalisation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5625-5649, June.
    2. Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Pereira, Karine Vargas & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Michelin, Cláudia de Freitas & Rigo, Paula Donaduzzi & Quiroga, Daniel Oscar & Manosso, Thayane Sviercoski, 2024. "Factors that impact on Brazilian rural producers’ decision-making: A systematic literature review," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 15(02), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Peschke & Sotirios Gyftopoulos & Ayhan Kapusuzoğlu & Frans Folkvord & Yasemin Gümüş Ağca & Eleni Kaldoudi & George Drosatos & Nildağ Başak Ceylan & Leandro Pecchia & Seldağ Güneş Peschke, 2024. "Practices of Knowledge Exchange in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12881-12918, September.
    2. Eristian WIBISONO, 2024. "Strengthening Civil Society Engagement In Regional Innovation Policy: A Quadruple Helix Perspective," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 49-69, August.
    3. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Jukka Teras & Viktor Salenius & Laura Fagerlund & Lina Stanionyte, 2018. "Smart Specialisation in Sparsely Populated European Arctic Regions," JRC Research Reports JRC114273, Joint Research Centre.
    5. König, Jonas & Suwala, Lech & Delargy, Colin, 2020. "Helix Models of Innovation and Sustainable Development Goals," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-15.
    6. Lyudmila Nikolaevna Perepechko & Galina Yakovlevna Belyakova, 2018. "The Interconnection among Science, Industry, State, and Society in Russia," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 34(4), pages 425-443, December.
    7. Veldhuizen, Caroline, 2020. "Smart Specialisation as a transition management framework: Driving sustainability-focused regional innovation policy?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    8. Zafeirios Thomakis & Irene Daskalopoulou, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Views and Rural Entrepreneurial Potential: Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1611-1634, June.
    9. Ariful Islam & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2023. "Configuring a Quadruple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM) Based Blueprint for Malaysian SMEs to Survivethe Covid-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(1), pages 102-127.
    10. Tomasi Sabrina & Cavicchi Alessio & Aleffi Chiara & Paviotti Gigliola & Ferrara Concetta & Baldoni Federica & Passarini Paolo, 2021. "Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Marcin Lis, 2021. "Higher Education Institutions as Partners in Growing Innovation of Local Economy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Francesca Spigarelli, 2018. "Fostering Cross-Sector Collaboration to Promote Innovation in the Water Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Elzbieta Szymanska & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska, 2022. "Sustainable Innovative Mobility Solutions Preferred by Inhabitants of Rural Areas—The Case of Lithuania and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Aurore Flipo & Madeleine Sallustio & Nathalie Ortar & Nicolas Senil, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility and the Institutional Lock-In: The Example of Rural France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Alessio Cavicchi & Ilaria Trap?, 2018. "Editoriale. Universit? e co-creazione di valore nelle aree rurali," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 5-8.
    16. Andréa Aparecida Costa Mineiro & Cleber Carvalho Castro & Marcelo Gonçalves do Amaral, 2024. "Who Are the Actors of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix? Multiple Cases in Consolidated Science and Technology Parks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4691-4709, March.
    17. Mori, Junichi & Stroud, Dean, 2021. "Skills policy for growth and development: The merits of local approaches in Vietnam," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Annemarie Polderman & Andreas Haller & Diego Viesi & Xavier Tabin & Stefano Sala & Annamaria Giorgi & Loïc Darmayan & Jakob Rager & Jelena Vidovič & Quentin Daragon & Yves Verchère & Uroš Zupan & Nadi, 2020. "How Can Ski Resorts Get Smart? Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Winter Tourism in the European Alps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Raluca Nastase-Anysz & Andrada Baba, 2020. "Public Sector Intervention in a Period of Crisis: Study Based on Applied Relationship Marketing Principles," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 923-935.
    20. Lanyue Zhang & Stavros Sindakis & Nipun Dhaulta & Simplice Asongu, 2024. "Economic Crisis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Entrepreneurship for Improving the Nigerian Mono-Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 828-859, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:7-8:p:650-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.