IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdv/wpaper/credresearchpaper21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yasmine Willi, Marco P tz, Heike Mayer

Abstract

The scholarly regional governance debate usually divides actors into two categories: state actors, representing the public domain and politics, and non-state actors, representing the economy and civil society. However, these categories are based on the functional context and not on the actual behaviour patterns of the actors. Also, this dichotomy fails to explain why actors contribute differently to regional development processes. In analysing the design and implementation phases of regional development strategies, we observe that some of the involved actors show entrepreneurial behaviour. We understand these actors as governance entrepreneurs. Based on their behaviour, we differentiate between two new categories: realising and enabling governance entrepreneurs. Realising governance entrepreneurs contribute to regional development processes through creativity and innovation, alertness to opportunities and a willingness to invest personal resources and take risks. Enabling governance entrepreneurs contribute through a large network, persistence in negotiation and the capacity to operate across various government levels and economic sectors. The findings are based on 33 in-depth expert interviews across six rural and peripheral regions in Switzerland where two National Development Policies are applied to strengthen regional development processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasmine Willi, Marco P tz, Heike Mayer, 2018. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Regional Development," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper21, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    • Handle: RePEc:rdv:wpaper:credresearchpaper21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.vwiit.ch/cred/CREDResearchPaper21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Pearce & Sarah Ayres, 2009. "Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 537-557, March.
    2. Michael Fritsch, 2017. "The theory of economic development – An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 654-655, April.
    3. Israel M. Kirzner, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 60-85, March.
    4. Harriet Bulkeley, 2012. "Governance and the Geography of Authority: Modalities of Authorisation and the Transnational Governing of Climate Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2428-2444, October.
    5. Sarah Ayres & Ian Stafford, 2014. "Managing Complexity and Uncertainty in Regional Governance Networks: A Critical Analysis of State Rescaling in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 219-235, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Rundel & Koen Salemink, 2021. "Hubs, hopes and high stakes for a relatively disadvantaged low tech place," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 650-668, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasmine Willi & Marco Pütz & Martin Müller, 2018. "Towards a versatile and multidimensional framework to analyse regional governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 775-795, August.
    2. Oasis Kodila-Tedika & Julius Agbor, 2016. "Does Trust Matter for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Agnieszka Żur, 2015. "Opportunity Identification and Creation as Factors of Firm Internationalisation," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(2), pages 25-39.
    4. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    5. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    6. Grazia Cecere, 2015. "The economics of innovation: a review article," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 185-197, April.
    7. Enrico Santarelli & Hien Tran, 2013. "The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: the case of Vietnam," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 435-458, February.
    8. Shastitko, Andrey & Golovanova, Svetlana, 2016. "Meeting blindly… Is Austrian economics useful for dynamic capabilities theory?," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 86-110.
    9. Adam Martin & Matias Petersen, 2019. "Poverty Alleviation as an Economic Problem," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(1), pages 205-221.
    10. Wolfgang Kerber & Oliver Budzinski, "undated". "Towards a Differentiated Analysis of Competition of Competition Laws," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2004-1-1090, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    11. Alina Petronela NEGREA & Valentin COJANU, 2015. "Innovation In The European Value Chain: The Case Of The Romanian Automotive Industry," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(1), pages 126-146, March.
    12. Comitato di Redazione, 2015. "Recensioni," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 347-356.
    13. Enrico Vanino & Stephen Roper & Bettina Becker, 2020. "Knowledge to Money: Assessing the Business Performance Effects of Publicly Funded R&D Grants," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 20-24, January.
    14. Mulligan, Robert F., 2004. "Fractal analysis of highly volatile markets: an application to technology equities," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 155-179, February.
    15. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Scott Stern, 2021. "Enabling Entrepreneurial Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5510-5524, September.
    16. de Soto Jesus Huerta, 1998. "The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 75-114, March.
    17. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 295-320, December.
    18. Magnus Henrekson & Jesper Roine, 2007. "Promoting Entrepreneurship in the Welfare State," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Isabel Grilo & A. Roy Thurik (ed.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Brixy, Udo & Sternberg, Rolf & Stüber, Heiko, 2008. "From potential to real entrepreneurship," IAB-Discussion Paper 200832, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    20. Landström, Hans & Harirchi, Gouya & Åström, Fredrik, 2012. "Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1154-1181.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regional governance; regional development; policy entrepreneurs; entrepreneur- ship; actor typology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdv:wpaper:credresearchpaper21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Franz Koelliker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vwibech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.