IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i3d10.1007_s13132-023-01537-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practices of Knowledge Exchange in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Lutz Peschke

    (Bilkent University)

  • Sotirios Gyftopoulos

    (The European Alliance for Medical and Biological Engineering and Science (EAMBES)
    Democritus University of Thrace School of Engineering)

  • Ayhan Kapusuzoğlu

    (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University)

  • Frans Folkvord

    (Tilburg University
    PredictBy Research)

  • Yasemin Gümüş Ağca

    (Bilkent University)

  • Eleni Kaldoudi

    (The European Alliance for Medical and Biological Engineering and Science (EAMBES)
    Democritus University of Thrace)

  • George Drosatos

    (The European Alliance for Medical and Biological Engineering and Science (EAMBES)
    Athena Research and Innovation Center in Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies)

  • Nildağ Başak Ceylan

    (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University)

  • Leandro Pecchia

    (The European Alliance for Medical and Biological Engineering and Science (EAMBES)
    Università Campus Bio-Medico)

  • Seldağ Güneş Peschke

    (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University)

Abstract

This paper contributes to a better understanding of a system of pandemic knowledge exchanges. Therefore, three different case studies conducted in Germany, Greece, and Turkiye and executed in multiple countries were analyzed in the context of Mode 3 knowledge production and the Quintuple Helix system. While the Quintuple Helix system describes the knowledge exchange processes between the systems of science, economy, politics, public, and natural environment of societies for sustainable innovation processes, Mode 3 emphasizes the importance of a creative environment for research and innovation. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that the need for knowledge exchange with the media-based public increased dramatically. In both models, Mode 3 and the Quintuple Helix but also in the Design Thinking approach, the creative environment incorporates the knowledge of the media-based public. Nonetheless, the reality of the public is constructed as media reality. Therefore, a mix of evidence-based and opinion-based knowledge is produced and transferred during knowledge exchange in the context of innovation processes including public engagement. It could be understood that the mediating entities media and general practitioners have a similar double function in the context of knowledge exchange with the public during the pandemic times. The results reveal the big need for knowledge communication and exchange platforms which on the one hand strengthen citizen participation by transforming opinion-based into evidence-based content. On the other hand, reach the status of a global standard medium for the pandemic knowledge exchange accepted by all stakeholders of the Quintuple Helix. This generates a shared-knowledge environment with a gain for all systems of the Quintuple Helix during the sustainable innovation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutz Peschke & Sotirios Gyftopoulos & Ayhan Kapusuzoğlu & Frans Folkvord & Yasemin Gümüş Ağca & Eleni Kaldoudi & George Drosatos & Nildağ Başak Ceylan & Leandro Pecchia & Seldağ Güneş Peschke, 2024. "Practices of Knowledge Exchange in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12881-12918, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01537-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01537-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01537-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01537-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01537-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.