IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v16y2019i3p219-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting after action review in simulator mission training: Co-creating visualization concepts for training of fast-jet fighter pilots

Author

Listed:
  • Sanna Aronsson
  • Henrik Artman
  • Sinna Lindquist
  • Mikael Mitchell
  • Tomas Persson
  • Robert Ramberg
  • Mario Romero
  • Pontus ter Vehn

Abstract

This article presents the design and evaluation of visualization concepts supporting After Action Review (AAR) in simulator mission training of fast-jet fighter pilots. The visualization concepts were designed based on three key characteristics of representations: re-representation, graphical constraining, and computational offloading. The visualization concepts represent combined parameters of missile launch and threat range , the former meant to elicit discussions about the prerequisites for launching missiles, and the latter to present details of what threats a certain aircraft is facing at a specific moment. The visualization concepts were designed to: 1) perceptually and cognitively offload mental workload from participants in support of determining relevant situations to discuss; 2) re-represent parameters in a format that facilitates reading-off of crucial information; and 3) graphically constrain plausible interpretations. Through a series of workshop iterations, two visualization concepts were developed and evaluated with 11 pilots and instructors. All pilots were unanimous in their opinion that the visualization concepts should be implemented as part of the AAR. Offloading, in terms of finding interesting events in the dynamic and unique training sessions, was the most important guiding concept, while re-representation and graphical constraining enabled a more structured and grounded collaboration during the AAR.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanna Aronsson & Henrik Artman & Sinna Lindquist & Mikael Mitchell & Tomas Persson & Robert Ramberg & Mario Romero & Pontus ter Vehn, 2019. "Supporting after action review in simulator mission training: Co-creating visualization concepts for training of fast-jet fighter pilots," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 16(3), pages 219-231, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:219-231
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512918823296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512918823296
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512918823296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2015. "Teaching with technology," Teaching in Focus 12, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:737-752 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gugu Ndawo, 2019. "Nurse Educators’ Experiences Regarding Subject Competence at a Nursing College," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 138-138, April.
    3. Ogden, Joan & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Scheitrum, Daniel & McDonald, Zane & Miller, Marshall, 2018. "Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 317-329.
    4. Alina Evstigneeva & Mark Sidorovskiy, 2021. "Assessment of Clarity of Bank of Russia Monetary Policy Communication by Neural Network Approach," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 80(3), pages 3-33, September.
    5. Ján Záhorec & Alena Hašková & Adriana Poliaková & Michal Munk, 2021. "Case Study of the Integration of Digital Competencies into Teacher Preparation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Mohammad Akbari Boorang* & Hossein Shokohi Fard & Bahman Yasbolaghi Sharahi & Rouhollah Khodabandelou, 2018. "A Phenomenological Study on Teacher’s View and Perspectives on Using Technology in Teaching & Learning," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 748-755:2.
    7. Gkogkidis, Vasilis & Dacre, Nicholas, 2020. "Exploratory Learning Environments for Responsible Management Education Using Lego Serious Play," SocArXiv ek7th, Center for Open Science.
    8. Hyunjin Cha & Taejung Park & Jongwon Seo, 2020. "What Should Be Considered when Developing ICT-Integrated Classroom Models for a Developing Country?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Ogunkunle Segun Jacob, 2018. "Future career interest in science, gender and students’ acquisition of science process skills in basic science in Oyo state, Nigeria," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 4(4), pages 175-182.
    10. Falih M. Alsaaty & Ella Carter & David Abrahams & Faleh Alshameri, 2016. "Traditional Versus Online Learning in Institutions of Higher Education: Minority Business Students¡¯ Perceptions," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 31-41, June.
    11. Asongu, Simplice A. & Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. & Orim, Stella-Maris I., 2018. "Mobile phones, institutional quality and entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 183-203.
    12. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.
    13. Burke, Andrew & Ogden, Joan & Fulton, Lewis & Cerniauskas, Simonas, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage and Transport: Technologies and Costs," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt83p5k54m, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Jian Wang, 2020. "A Behavioral Model for Analysis and Intervention of Healthy Dietary Behavior," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-57, April.
    15. Mercedes Llorent-Vaquero, 2016. "Student Participation in the Governing Bodies of Spanish Universities," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 1-11, August.
    16. Sheryl Burgstahler, 2015. "Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(6), pages 69-79.
    17. Mutlu Soykurt & Hüseyin Uzunboylu, 2018. "The impact of creative activities integrated into curriculum for tolerance education and teachers’ reflections," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 913-927, December.
    18. Cansino, José M. & Román, Rocío, 2017. "Energy efficiency improvements in air traffic: The case of Airbus A320 in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 109-122.
    19. Agrawal, Asha Weinsten & Granger-Bevan, Stephen & Newmark, Gregory L. & Nixon, Hilary, 2017. "Comparing data quality and cost from three modes of on-board transit surveys," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 70-79.
    20. Suvanna Trongtorsak & Kobkiat Saraubon & Prachyanun Nilsook, 2021. "Collaborative Experiential Learning Process for Enhancing Digital Entrepreneurship," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 137-147, March.
    21. Francisca Angélica Monroy García & Fátima Llamas-Salguero & María Rosa Fernández-Sánchez & José Luis Carrión del Campo, 2020. "Digital Technologies at the Pre-University and University Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:219-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.