IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v7y2006i2p195-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Usefulness of Conventional and Recent Personality Assessment Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Taran Patel

    (Taran Patel is Professor, Strategy and Management Department, Groupe ESC Rennes, 2, Rue Robert D'Arbrissel, Rennes 35065. France.)

Abstract

This conceptual article explores different personality assessment tools like the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI) tool and the Five-Factor Model and compares them with a relatively new instrument called PerformanSe. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of these instruments commonly used for personality assessment. If understanding and predicting behaviours of people is important to academic and practitioners alike, it is equally important that they understand the strengths and weaknesses of the different personality assessment tools available to them. Understanding the limitations of the tools available curbs their perfectionist impulse and encourages them to treat these tools with a critical eye. This understanding will not only prevent practitioners from taking wrong decisions in recruiting or promoting employees, but will also save them from legal disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Taran Patel, 2006. "Comparing the Usefulness of Conventional and Recent Personality Assessment Tools," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 195-218, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:7:y:2006:i:2:p:195-218
    DOI: 10.1177/097215090600700202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097215090600700202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097215090600700202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary O. Borg & Stephen L. Shapiro, 1996. "Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 3-25, January.
    2. Clifford Oswick & Patrick Barber, 1998. "Personality type and performance in an introductory level accounting course : a research note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 249-254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Semeijn,J. & Velden,R.,Van der, 1999. "Aspects of learning style and labour market entry an explorative study," ROA Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    2. Erlane K Ghani & Jamaliah Said & Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, 2012. "The Effect of Teaching Format, Students¡¯ Ability and Cognitive Effort on Accounting Students¡¯ Performance," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(3), pages 81-98, June.
    3. Oskar Harmon & William Alpert & Joseph Histen, 2014. "Online Discussion and Learning Outcomes," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 20(1), pages 33-44, February.
    4. Roger B. Butters & Carlos J. Asarta & Tammie J. Fischer, 2011. "Human Capital in The Classroom: The Role of Teacher Knowledge in Economic Literacy," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 56(2), pages 47-57, November.
    5. Charles H. Breeden & Noreen Lephardt, 2005. "Changes in Student Attitudes toward the Market System and the Introductory Microeconomics Course," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 21(Fall 2005), pages 164-179.
    6. Hart Hodges & Yvonne Durham & Steve Henson, 2018. "Economic Education Production Functions for the Principles of Macroeconomics and the Principles of Microeconomics: Is There a Difference?," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 22-41, Fall.
    7. Coates, Dennis & Humphreys, Brad R. & Kane, John & Vachris, Michelle A., 2004. ""No significant distance" between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 533-546, October.
    8. Yvonne Durham & Thomas Mckinnon & Craig Schulman, 2007. "Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun And Games," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(1), pages 162-178, January.
    9. Andon, Paul & Chong, Kar Ming & Roebuck, Peter, 2010. "Personality preferences of accounting and non-accounting graduates seeking to enter the accounting profession," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 253-265.
    10. Anthony Barilla & Darrell Parker & Chris Paul, 2005. "An Educational Note on Locus of Control and Personality Type in the Formation of Students' Attitudes Toward Economic Institutions," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 20(Spring 20), pages 192-202.
    11. Leiby, Justin & Madsen, Paul E., 2017. "Margin of safety: Life history strategies and the effects of socioeconomic status on self-selection into accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 21-36.
    12. Steven Dickey & Robert Houston Jr., 2009. "Disaggregating Education Production," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 37(2), pages 135-144, June.
    13. Benjamin Matta & Joseph Guzman & Sue Stockly & Benjamin Widner, 2015. "Class Size Effects on Student Performance in a Hispanic-Serving Institution," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 443-457, December.
    14. Desai Tejas A & Sharda, Kirti, 2009. "Understanding the "Business Type": A Comparitive Analysis of Management Students and Business Executives," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-11-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Tanvi Paras Kothari & Sameer Sudhakar Pingle, 2015. "Establishing the Relationship between Marketing Specialization and Personality Traits among Management Students," Paradigm, , vol. 19(2), pages 170-183, December.
    16. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2003. "Factors explaining the choice of a finance major: the role of students' characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 261-281.
    17. Semeijn, Judith & Boone, Christophe & van der Velden, Rolf & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2005. "Graduates' personality characteristics and labor market entry an empirical study among dutch economics graduates," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 67-83, February.
    18. Amila Pilav-Veliæ & Hatidža Jahiæ & Jasmina Okièiæ & Jasmina Selimoviæ & Elvedin Grabovica, 2021. "Emergency remote learning acceptance among higher education students during COVID-19 pandemic," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 39(2), pages 325-347.
    19. Marianne Johnson & Denise Robson & Sarinda Taengnoi, 2014. "A Meta-analysis of the Gender Gap in Performance in Collegiate Economics Courses," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 436-459, October.
    20. Zeynep Hansen & Hideo Owan & Jie Pan, 2015. "The impact of group diversity on class performance: evidence from college classrooms," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 238-258, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:7:y:2006:i:2:p:195-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.