IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v6y2016i7p262-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Freemind on Students’ Performance in an Advanced Financial Accounting Course

Author

Listed:
  • Erlane K. Ghani
  • Kamaruzzaman Muhammad

Abstract

This study examines the effect of using an application of a computer-assisted teaching tool in enhancing the dissemination of knowledge to students in improving their understanding and performance of a course. This study was conducted on undergraduate students who sat for an advanced financial accounting course. The teaching tool known as Freemind was introduced in the class with the aim to mitigate the possibility of knowledge dissemination breakdown due to the reduction of meeting hours of this course from 4 to 3 hours and application of a mass lecture of over 90 students. Based on 160 students as the sample study, this study shows a significant increase in the results of the students when Freemind was adopted as the teaching tool compared to those students who were taught using PowerPoint. This study provides some evidences that students’ performance in advanced financial accounting could be improved with the assistance of Freemind.

Suggested Citation

  • Erlane K. Ghani & Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, 2016. "The Effect of Freemind on Students’ Performance in an Advanced Financial Accounting Course," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(7), pages 262-275, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:6:y:2016:i:7:p:262-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/The_Effect_of_Freemind_on_Students_Performance_in_an_Advanced_Financial_Accounting_Course.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/The_Effect_of_Freemind_on_Students_Performance_in_an_Advanced_Financial_Accounting_Course.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary O. Borg & Stephen L. Shapiro, 1996. "Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 3-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Semeijn,J. & Velden,R.,Van der, 1999. "Aspects of learning style and labour market entry an explorative study," ROA Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    2. Erlane K Ghani & Jamaliah Said & Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, 2012. "The Effect of Teaching Format, Students¡¯ Ability and Cognitive Effort on Accounting Students¡¯ Performance," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(3), pages 81-98, June.
    3. Oskar Harmon & William Alpert & Joseph Histen, 2014. "Online Discussion and Learning Outcomes," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 20(1), pages 33-44, February.
    4. Roger B. Butters & Carlos J. Asarta & Tammie J. Fischer, 2011. "Human Capital in The Classroom: The Role of Teacher Knowledge in Economic Literacy," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 56(2), pages 47-57, November.
    5. Charles H. Breeden & Noreen Lephardt, 2005. "Changes in Student Attitudes toward the Market System and the Introductory Microeconomics Course," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 21(Fall 2005), pages 164-179.
    6. Hart Hodges & Yvonne Durham & Steve Henson, 2018. "Economic Education Production Functions for the Principles of Macroeconomics and the Principles of Microeconomics: Is There a Difference?," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 22-41, Fall.
    7. Coates, Dennis & Humphreys, Brad R. & Kane, John & Vachris, Michelle A., 2004. ""No significant distance" between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 533-546, October.
    8. Yvonne Durham & Thomas Mckinnon & Craig Schulman, 2007. "Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun And Games," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(1), pages 162-178, January.
    9. Anthony Barilla & Darrell Parker & Chris Paul, 2005. "An Educational Note on Locus of Control and Personality Type in the Formation of Students' Attitudes Toward Economic Institutions," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 20(Spring 20), pages 192-202.
    10. Steven Dickey & Robert Houston Jr., 2009. "Disaggregating Education Production," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 37(2), pages 135-144, June.
    11. Benjamin Matta & Joseph Guzman & Sue Stockly & Benjamin Widner, 2015. "Class Size Effects on Student Performance in a Hispanic-Serving Institution," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 443-457, December.
    12. Desai Tejas A & Sharda, Kirti, 2009. "Understanding the "Business Type": A Comparitive Analysis of Management Students and Business Executives," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-11-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    13. Semeijn, Judith & Boone, Christophe & van der Velden, Rolf & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2005. "Graduates' personality characteristics and labor market entry an empirical study among dutch economics graduates," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 67-83, February.
    14. Amila Pilav-Veliæ & Hatidža Jahiæ & Jasmina Okièiæ & Jasmina Selimoviæ & Elvedin Grabovica, 2021. "Emergency remote learning acceptance among higher education students during COVID-19 pandemic," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 39(2), pages 325-347.
    15. Marianne Johnson & Denise Robson & Sarinda Taengnoi, 2014. "A Meta-analysis of the Gender Gap in Performance in Collegiate Economics Courses," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 436-459, October.
    16. Zeynep Hansen & Hideo Owan & Jie Pan, 2015. "The impact of group diversity on class performance: evidence from college classrooms," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 238-258, April.
    17. Jane S. Lopus & Jody Hoff, 2009. "Is There a Disconnect Between Teaching Styles and Learning Styles in High School Economics Classes?," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 24(Spring 20), pages 157-164.
    18. Mary O'Malley Borg & Harriet Stranahan, 2002. "The effect of gender and race on student performance in principles of economics: the importance of personality type," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 589-598.
    19. Stephen Hickson, 2016. "Maybe the Boys Just Like Economics More - The Gender Gap and the Role of Personality Type in Economics Education," Working Papers in Economics 16/07, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    20. Ambrose & Cheryl A. Kier, 2017. "On Students’ Perception of a Multi-Scheme Assessment Method," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 17(1), pages 40-52, Spring.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:6:y:2016:i:7:p:262-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.