IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljms/v3i12p2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Strategic Thinking in Achieving Organizations Core Competencies: A Field Study on the Banking Sector in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Jehad S. Bani Hani

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between strategic thinking and the level of achieving core competencies in one hand, and the influence of strategic thinking in achieving core competencies in other hand. The target population for this study comprised all Jordanian’s banks listed in Amman Stock Exchange (16 Banks). Data were collected from 13 Jordanian banks. It hypothesized that strategic thinking is significantly associated with core competence achievement, also strategic thinking is significantly influence core competence achievement. The results supported that strategic thinking dimensions (System Perspective, Intelligent Opportunism, and Intent Focus, Thinking in Time, Hypothesis Driven, and Thinking Skills) have significant influence in core competence achievement. These influences, however, were not all at the same level. Based on the findings of this study, there are several recommendations for top and line managers at the Jordanian banks, and limitations and directions were suggested for future research are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Jehad S. Bani Hani, 2014. "The Role of Strategic Thinking in Achieving Organizations Core Competencies: A Field Study on the Banking Sector in Jordan," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(12), pages 864-879.
    • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i12p2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%202_1497345602.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hafsi, Taieb & Thomas, Howard, 2005. "The Field of Strategy:: In Search of a Walking Stick," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 507-519, October.
    2. C Eden & F Ackermann, 2000. "Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(1), pages 12-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ljungquist, Urban, 2012. "New Dimensions Added for Enhanced Core Competence Application," Working Papers 2012/03, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics.
    2. G A Hindle & L A Franco, 2009. "Combining problem structuring methods to conduct applied research: a mixed methods approach to studying fitness-to-drive in the UK," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1637-1648, December.
    3. Barneto, Pascal & Ouvrard, Stéphane, 2015. "Is the firm's business model related to segment reporting?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 122-137.
    4. Li Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Ari Kokko, 2019. "Does Ownership Determine Business Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    6. Beverly B. Tyler & Devi R. Gnyawali, 2009. "Managerial Collective Cognitions: An Examination of Similarities and Differences of Cultural Orientations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 93-126, January.
    7. Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Ferreira, João J.M., 2016. "Experience-focused thinking and cognitive mapping in ethical banking practices: From practical intuition to theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4953-4958.
    8. Hanieh Khodaei & Roland Ortt, 2019. "Capturing Dynamics in Business Model Frameworks," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    10. Hervé Goy & Gaelle Dechamp, 2008. "Le contrat d'établissement : un dispositif de gestion stratégique pour les universités françaises ?," Post-Print halshs-00676044, HAL.
    11. D Shaw & F Ackermann & C Eden, 2003. "Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(9), pages 936-948, September.
    12. Sanjay Bhattacharya & K. Momaya & K.C. Iyer, 2009. "Enablers of Sustaining Competitiveness," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 45-66, January.
    13. Gerry Johnson & Leif Melin & Richard Whittington, 2003. "Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity‐Based View," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 3-22, January.
    14. Pascal Barneto & Stéphane Ouvrard, 2013. "Existe-T-Il Une Relation Entre L'Information Sectorielle Et Le Tableau Des Flux De Tresorerie ?," Post-Print hal-00991963, HAL.
    15. Gerard George & Adam J. Bock, 2011. "The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-111, January.
    16. Hervé Goy, 2009. "La "stratégie en pratiques" comme cadre d'analyse des outils de gestion ?," Post-Print halshs-00676008, HAL.
    17. G Burt, 2011. "Towards the integration of system modelling with scenario planning to support strategy: the case of the UK energy industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(5), pages 830-839, May.
    18. De Brucker, Klaas & Macharis, Cathy & Verbeke, Alain, 2013. "Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 122-131.
    19. Igor Pyrko & Colin Eden & Susan Howick, 2019. "Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 233-253, April.
    20. Espinosa, Angela & Reficco, Ezequiel & Martínez, Andrea & Guzmán, David, 2015. "A methodology for supporting strategy implementation based on the VSM: A case study in a Latin-American multi-national," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 202-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i12p2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.