IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2019y2019i33p181-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media In The Presidential Election Campaign: Slovakia 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Maria MURRAY SVIDRONOVA

    (Matej BelUniversity; Banska Bystrica; Slovakia)

  • Alena KASCAKOVA

    (Matej BelUniversity; Banska Bystrica; Slovakia)

  • Gabriela BAMBUSEKOVA

    (Matej BelUniversity; Banska Bystrica; Slovakia)

Abstract

Since its origin, social media have been perceived as a place of selfexpression and freedom of opinion. Social media, especially Facebook, are considered a powerful tool for various public administration activities that do not relate only to informing citizens, but also having them participate in decision-making and municipality governance. Nowadays, social media are also used in the marketing of a person or political party. This paper deals with the position and tasks of social media in the 2019 presidential election campaign in Slovakia. The article is based on an analysis of the Facebook pages and profiles of all 15 candidates for the post of President of the Slovak Republic. The research was carried out in the months of September 2018 – March 2019 using a special tool for analyzing Facebook pages called Facepager. We analysed number and type of posts and interactions (i.e. number of likes and shares) for the candidates by calculating so called interaction rate. Using basic statistical methods, we have confirmed the relevance and importance of using social media in the presidential election campaign. The paper also suggests some steps for better election campaigns – municipal, regional, national or even European Union election campaigns, showing the big potential of social media in political marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria MURRAY SVIDRONOVA & Alena KASCAKOVA & Gabriela BAMBUSEKOVA, 2019. "Social Media In The Presidential Election Campaign: Slovakia 2019," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 181-194, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:181-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2019/33-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Zhang & Terry Daugherty, 2009. "Third-Person Effect and Social Networking: Implications for Online Marketing and Word-of-Mouth Communication," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(2), pages 53-63.
    2. Jie Zhang & Terry Daugherty, 2009. "Third‐Person Effect and Social Networking: Implications for Online Marketing and Word‐of‐Mouth Communication," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 53-64, October.
    3. Arthur Mickoleit, 2014. "Social Media Use by Governments: A Policy Primer to Discuss Trends, Identify Policy Opportunities and Guide Decision Makers," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 26, OECD Publishing.
    4. Margaret Scammell, 1999. "Political Marketing: Lessons for Political Science," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(4), pages 718-739, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kee-Young Kwahk & Byoungsoo Kim, 2017. "Effects of social media on consumers’ purchase decisions: evidence from Taobao," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 803-829, December.
    2. Changhyun Nam & Jihyeong Son & Jae-Gu Yu, 2019. "Effects of SNS Social Capital on E-Service Quality and Sustained Referral Intentions of E-Fitness Apparel: Comparative Body Image Satisfaction Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Huang, Li-Ting, 2016. "Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2277-2283.
    4. Hossain Md. Motaher & Zahidul Islam K. M. & Masud Abdullah Al & Biswas Sukanta & Hossain Md. Alamgir, 2021. "Behavioral intention and continued adoption of Facebook: An exploratory study of graduate students in Bangladesh during the Covid-19 pandemic," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 153-186, December.
    5. Tran, Gina A. & Strutton, David, 2020. "Comparing email and SNS users: Investigating e-servicescape, customer reviews, trust, loyalty and E-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Deepti Srivastava & Ruppal Walia Sharma, 2017. "Developing a Model for Studying the Antecedents and Effects of Word of Mouth (WoM) and e-WoM Marketing Based on Literature Review," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 25-43, June.
    7. Wang, Xia & Yu, Chunling & Wei, Yujie, 2012. "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 198-208.
    8. Payal S. Kapoor & K.R. Jayasimha & Ashish Sadh, 2013. "Brand-related, Consumer to Consumer, Communication via Social Media," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 43-59, January.
    9. Nezahat EKİCİ & Bayram ZAFER, 2019. "Reklamlarda Üçüncü Kişi Algısının Yanlı İyimserlik Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye ve Kanada Karşılaştırması," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 313-334, November.
    10. Sayibu Ibrahim Nnindini & Kobby Mensah, 2021. "Political Relationship Marketing: An Examination of Internal Relationship Management in Ghanaian Political Parties," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 13(3), pages 30-40.
    11. Mirdaim Axhami & Vjollca Hysi Panajoti & Mirela Mersini, 2015. "Factorial Analysis Application In Political Market – Case Of Albania," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 29-38, June.
    12. Homagni Choudhury & Zoltan Laszlo Kopacsi & Gunjan Saxena & Nishikant Mishra, 2021. "The Ethical Dimension in Political Market Orientation: A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of India’s Look East Policy on Regional Income Convergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 353-372, January.
    13. Heather Savigny & Mick Temple, 2010. "Political Marketing Models: The Curious Incident of the Dog that Doesn't Bark," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1049-1064, December.
    14. Nikolay Vankov, 2013. "The strategic dimensions of Political Marketing," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 74-80, September.
    15. Ester Guijarro & Cristina Santadreu-Mascarell & Beatriz Blasco-Gallego & Lourdes Canós-Darós & Eugenia Babiloni, 2021. "On the Identification of the Key Factors for a Successful Use of Twitter as a Medium from a Social Marketing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Abid, Aman & Harrigan, Paul, 2020. "An exploration of social media-enabled voter relationships through uses and gratifications theory, psychological contract and service-dominant orientation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 71-82.
    17. Khaled A. Gad, 2014. "The Impact of Political Advertising through Social Networking Sites on Egyptians’ Political Orientations and Choices," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Špaček David, 2018. "Social Media Use in Public Administration: The Case of Facebook Use by Czech Regions," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 199-218, December.
    19. Saxena, Stuti, 2015. "Why did I prefer to vote for my political party?," MPRA Paper 68216, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Boris Ginzburg, 2023. "Slacktivism," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 35(2), pages 126-143, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social networks; social media; presidential election campaign; Slovakia.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • H19 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Other
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:181-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.