IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v17y2022i3p20-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Destructive Organizational Communication And Manipulation: Emergent Forms, Consequences And Coping In The Function Of Smarter Organizational Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Bogdanović1

    (Istrian University of Applied Sciences in Pola, Croatia)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to list and explain the manifestations of destructive organizational communication (N=24) and manipulation (N=26) as important communication phenomena in the area of dark side management/black art of management/dark managerial skills. For that purpose it is used the method of description, synthesis and insight.From an organizational/social point of view, it is important to identify, recognize and deal with destructive/deviant communication phenomena that occur and manifest in many forms in order to minimize organizational/social damage (e.g. functional organizational stupidity/stupidity management). Techniques of destructive organizational manipulation were collected through insight into sources and life experience. Total of N=50 known/unknown techniques are connected with functional organizational stupidity and stupidity management as regular consequences of successful use of explicit destructive and manipulative techniques. As features of coping with the mentioned „dark“communication techniques, preventive and reactive measures are listed and explicated. This is done in order to control destructive communication tendencies and create/maintain the desired productive (smart) organizational communication climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Bogdanović1, 2022. "Destructive Organizational Communication And Manipulation: Emergent Forms, Consequences And Coping In The Function Of Smarter Organizational Solutions," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 17(3), pages 20-39, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:20-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/FA22/REBE-FA22-A3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Bogdanović & Milota Vetráková & Stanislav Filip, 2018. "Dark triad characteristics between economics & business students in Croatia & Slovakia: what can be expected from the future employees?," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 967-991, June.
    2. Mats Alvesson & André Spicer, 2012. "A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7), pages 1194-1220, November.
    3. Mario BOGDANOVIĆ, 2016. "Manipulation of human mind as dominant strategy in achieving tax compliance," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(1), pages 24-51, March.
    4. Izabela Jonek Kowalska, 2012. "Synergy Effects in the Mergers of Collieries," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 1(2), pages 103-122.
    5. Long‐Zeng Wu & Frederick Hong‐kit Yim & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2012. "Coping with Workplace Ostracism: The Roles of Ingratiation and Political Skill in Employee Psychological Distress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 178-199, January.
    6. Mario Bogdanović, 2021. "Hypocrisy Management: How To Resolve Some Basic Business Ethics Problems?," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 16(2), pages 20-39, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Bogdanović, 2023. "Destructive Organizational Communication And Manipulation: Emergent Forms, Consequences And Coping In The Function Of Smarter Organizational Solutions," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 18(1), pages 65-84, March.
    2. Wu, Chia-Huei & Liu, Jun & Kwong Kwan, Ho & Lee, Cynthia, 2016. "Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: an organizational identification perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Tahira Rasheed & Arshad Zaheer & Sadaf Manzoor, 2021. "Do Narcissists Tend to Reduce Interpersonal Conflicts in Organizations? The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Ostracism and Interpersonal Conflicts," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(6), pages 43-58.
    4. Thomas, Rhodri & Wood, Emma, 2015. "The absorptive capacity of tourism organisations," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-99.
    5. Yejun Zhang & Mark C. Bolino & Kui Yin, 2023. "The Interactive Effect of Perceived Overqualification and Peer Overqualification on Peer Ostracism and Work Meaningfulness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 699-716, January.
    6. Wendelin Kuepers & David M. Wasieleski & Gunter Schumacher, 2023. "Temporality and Ethics: Timeliness of Ethical Perspectives on Temporality in Times of Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 629-643, December.
    7. Kristof Van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Stefan Verweij, 2020. "Learning from Other Places and Their Plans: Comparative Learning in and for Planning Systems," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5.
    8. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Power, Sean Bradley, 2022. "COVID-19 profit warnings: Delivering bad news in a time of crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    9. Xiao-Yu Liu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2020. "Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 325-344, March.
    10. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    11. Lance Ferris, D. & Fatimah, Shereen & Yan, Ming & Liang, Lindie H. & Lian, Huiwen & Brown, Douglas J., 2019. "Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 138-149.
    12. Murphy, Tim & O’Connell, Vincent, 2017. "Challenging the dominance of formalism in accounting education: An analysis of the potential of stewardship in light of the evolution of legal education," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-29.
    13. Wenyuan Huang & Chuqin Yuan, 2024. "Workplace Ostracism and Helping Behavior: A Cross-Level Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 787-800, April.
    14. Kristof Van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Stefan Verweij, 2020. "Learning from Other Places and Their Plans: Comparative Learning in and for Planning Systems," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5.
    15. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    16. Long-Zeng Wu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Li-Qun Wei & Jun Liu, 2013. "Ingratiation in the Workplace: The Role of Subordinate and Supervisor Political Skill," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 991-1017, September.
    17. Haina Zhang & Ziwei Yang & Ho Kwong Kwan & Fangjian Wu, 2023. "Workplace ostracism and family social support: a moderated mediation model of personal reputation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1643-1682, December.
    18. Robert Cialdini & Yexin Jessica Li & Adriana Samper & Ned Wellman, 2021. "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 861-880, February.
    19. Jie Xin & Shouming Chen & Ho Kwong Kwan & Randy K. Chiu & Frederick Hong-kit Yim, 2018. "Work–Family Spillover and Crossover Effects of Sexual Harassment: The Moderating Role of Work–Home Segmentation Preference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 619-629, February.
    20. Gottlieb, Uliana & Johed, Gustav & Hansson, Helena, 2022. "Accounting and accountability for farm animals: Conceptual limits and the possibilities of caring," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:20-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.