IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prp/jattij/v14y2021i2p217-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the Implications of Organizational Creativity Regarding the Size of Enterprises in the Tourism Sector: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author

Listed:
  • Danijela Madžar

    (University of Mostar, Bosnia and Hercegovina)

  • Ines Milohnic

    (University of Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Ivan Madžar

    (University of Mostar, Bosnia and Hercegovina)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to indicate the importance and differences in the implications of organizational creativity regarding enterprise size in the tourism sector. In the process of creativity management, it is essential to develop the capacity for continuous change and frequent adjustment while preserving the identity and value of the organization. The paper is based on a basic hypothesis that there are significant differences in managing organizational creativity associated with enterprise size in tourism. Research results have shown that larger companies are more likely to succeed in managing creativity, which is explained by their access to human, material and financial resources. In general, the behaviour of enterprises in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and especially in the tourism sector, is a relatively unexplored phenomenon. The results of the research are significant as there is no relevant research on the management of creativity in the service sector as a whole and the tourism sector of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Suggested Citation

  • Danijela Madžar & Ines Milohnic & Ivan Madžar, 2021. "Differences in the Implications of Organizational Creativity Regarding the Size of Enterprises in the Tourism Sector: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(2), pages 217-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:prp:jattij:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:217-226
    DOI: 10.26493/2335-4194.14.217-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/2335-4194/14.217-226.pdf
    File Function: full text in English
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/2335-4194.14.217-226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gu, Huimin & Duverger, Philippe & Yu, Larry, 2017. "Can innovative behavior be led by management? A study from the lodging business," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 144-157.
    2. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Michaela Sirková & Viktória Ali Taha & Martina Ferencová & Pavol Jozef Šafárik, 2014. "An Analytical Study On Organizational Creativity: Implications For Management," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 10(2), pages 179-187, December.
    4. Carmeli, Abraham, 2004. "Assessing Core Intangible Resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 110-122, February.
    5. Barbara Slavich & Silviya Svejenova, 2016. "Managing Creativity: A Critical Examination, Synthesis, and New Frontiers," Post-Print hal-01562990, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leone, Ludovica, 2020. "The Ratatouille paradox. An inductive study of creativity in haute cuisine," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    2. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    3. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Adamou, Pr. Rabani & Ibrahim, Boubacar & Bonkaney, Abdou Latif & Seyni, Abdoul Aziz & Idrissa, Mamoudou, 2021. "Niger - Land, climate, energy, agriculture and development: A study in the Sudano-Sahel Initiative for Regional Development, Jobs, and Food Security," Working Papers 308806, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    6. LametK.Maika & Kevin Wachira, 2020. "Effects of organizational culture on strategy implementation in water boards in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 15-28, July.
    7. White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2019. "Programmatic Advertising: Forewarning and avoiding hype-cycle failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 157-168.
    8. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Research Reports JRC115004, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Samuel Facanha Camara & Brenno Buarque de Lima & Teresa Lenice Nogueira da Gama Mota & Alanna Lima e Silva & Pablo Padilha, 2018. "Gender The Management of Innovation Networks: Possibilities of Collaboration in Light of Game Theory," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 24-34, June.
    10. Caroline Buts & Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Michaël R. J. Dooms & Kim Willems, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Standards in Belgium," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 44-64, January.
    11. Lanu Kim, 2021. "Geographical Locations of Occupations and Information and Communication Technology: Do Online Tools Impact Where People in the United States Live and Work?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    12. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    13. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    14. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    15. Glenn Dutcher & Cortney S. Rodet, 2022. "Which two heads are better than one? Uncovering the positive effects of diversity in creative teams," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 884-897, November.
    16. Prince Destiny Ugo, 2017. "Project Quality Management Performance: An Insight to Sustainable Development Initiatives in Oil and Gas Host Communities," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 76-88, December.
    17. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Li Zhang & Meng-Hsiu Lee & Fang-Yih Hsu & Yan Xu & Yuan He, 2024. "The relationship between strategic human resource management, green innovation and environmental performance: a moderated-mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-488 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    20. Justus Baron & Daniel F. Spulber, 2018. "Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 462-503, September.
    21. Ommen, Nils O. & Blut, Markus & Backhaus, Christof & Woisetschläger, David M., 2016. "Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2409-2416.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prp:jattij:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:217-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://academica.turistica.si .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.