IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0228960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domain-general cognitive functions fully explained growth in nonsymbolic magnitude representation but not in symbolic representation in elementary school children

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Kuzmina
  • Tatiana Tikhomirova
  • Irina Lysenkova
  • Sergey Malykh

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare developmental changes in nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude representations across the elementary school years. For this aim, we used a four-wave longitudinal study with a one-year interval in schoolchildren in grades 1–4 in Russia and Kyrgyzstan (N = 490, mean age was 7.65 years at grade 1). The results of mixed-effects growth models revealed that growth in the precision of symbolic representation was larger than in the nonsymbolic representation. Moreover, growth in nonsymbolic representation was fully explained by growth in fluid intelligence (FI), visuospatial working memory (VSWM) and processing speed (PS). The analysis demonstrated that growth in nonsymbolic magnitude representation was significant only for pupils with a high level of FI and PS, whereas growth in precision of symbolic representation did not significantly vary across pupils with different levels of FI or VSWM.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Kuzmina & Tatiana Tikhomirova & Irina Lysenkova & Sergey Malykh, 2020. "Domain-general cognitive functions fully explained growth in nonsymbolic magnitude representation but not in symbolic representation in elementary school children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228960
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228960&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0228960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Halberda & Michèle M. M. Mazzocco & Lisa Feigenson, 2008. "Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7213), pages 665-668, October.
    2. Julie Castronovo & Silke M Göbel, 2012. "Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Anna A Matejko & Daniel Ansari, 2016. "Trajectories of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing in the First Year of Formal Schooling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Liesje Coertjens & Vincent Donche & Sven De Maeyer & Gert Vanthournout & Peter Van Petegem, 2017. "To what degree does the missing-data technique influence the estimated growth in learning strategies over time? A tutorial example of sensitivity analysis for longitudinal data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Lukowski, Sarah L. & Rosenberg-Lee, Miriam & Thompson, Lee A. & Hart, Sara A. & Willcutt, Erik G. & Olson, Richard K. & Petrill, Stephen A. & Pennington, Bruce F., 2017. "Approximate number sense shares etiological overlap with mathematics and general cognitive ability," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Camilla K. Gilmore & Shannon E. McCarthy & Elizabeth S. Spelke, 2007. "Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7144), pages 589-591, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jade Eloise Norris & Julie Castronovo, 2016. "Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Carmen Brankaer & Pol Ghesquière & Bert De Smedt, 2014. "Children’s Mapping between Non-Symbolic and Symbolic Numerical Magnitudes and Its Association with Timed and Untimed Tests of Mathematics Achievement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Lukowski, Sarah L. & Rosenberg-Lee, Miriam & Thompson, Lee A. & Hart, Sara A. & Willcutt, Erik G. & Olson, Richard K. & Petrill, Stephen A. & Pennington, Bruce F., 2017. "Approximate number sense shares etiological overlap with mathematics and general cognitive ability," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 67-74.
    4. Peter Rumney & Joy Buttress & Iryna Kuksa, 2016. "Seeing, Doing, Writing," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, February.
    5. Fabio P. Leite & Roger Ratcliff, 2011. "What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(7), pages 651-687, October.
    6. Liat Goldfarb & Sharon Levy, 2013. "Counting within the Subitizing Range: The Effect of Number of Distractors on the Perception of Subset Items," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Michèle M M Mazzocco & Lisa Feigenson & Justin Halberda, 2011. "Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-8, September.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:651-687 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:330-344 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Riccardo Williams & Silvia Andreassi & Marta Moselli & Fiorella Fantini & Annalisa Tanzilli & Vittorio Lingiardi & Fiorenzo Laghi, 2023. "Relationship between Executive Functions, Social Cognition, and Attachment State of Mind in Adolescence: An Explorative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Roger, Tristan & Roger, Patrick & Willinger, Marc, 2022. "Number sense, trading decisions and mispricing: An experiment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Ye, Jun & Zhou, Kun & Chen, Rui, 2021. "Numerical or verbal Information: The effect of comparative information in social comparison on prosocial behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 198-211.
    13. Sabrina Finke & Chiara Banfi & H Harald Freudenthaler & Anna F Steiner & Stephan E Vogel & Silke M Göbel & Karin Landerl, 2021. "Common and distinct predictors of non-symbolic and symbolic ordinal number processing across the early primary school years," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Curren Katz & André Knops, 2014. "Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Luke F. Rinne & Michele M. M. Mazzocco, 2013. "Inferring uncertainty from interval estimates: Effects of alpha level and numeracy," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(3), pages 330-344, May.
    16. Julie Castronovo & Silke M Göbel, 2012. "Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Kyungmin Lee & Soohyun Cho, 2019. "Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Danielle Hoffmann & Christophe Mussolin & Romain Martin & Christine Schiltz, 2014. "The Impact of Mathematical Proficiency on the Number-Space Association," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    19. Galina Larina & Yulia Kuzmina & Georgijs Kanonirs, 2020. "The Precision Of Symbolic Numerical Representation In Verbal Format Has An Indirect Effect On Math Performance In First Grade," HSE Working papers WP BRP 120/PSY/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Delphine Sasanguie & Bert Reynvoet, 2014. "Adults' Arithmetic Builds on Fast and Automatic Processing of Arabic Digits: Evidence from an Audiovisual Matching Paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-6, February.
    21. Fang, Shijia & Zhou, Xinlin, 2022. "Form perception speed is critical for the relationship between non-verbal number sense and arithmetic fluency," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    22. Anna A Matejko & Daniel Ansari, 2016. "Trajectories of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing in the First Year of Formal Schooling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.