IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v95y2022ics016028962200085x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Form perception speed is critical for the relationship between non-verbal number sense and arithmetic fluency

Author

Listed:
  • Fang, Shijia
  • Zhou, Xinlin

Abstract

Form perception has been found to be critical for arithmetic fluency. How visual processing of form is related to arithmetic fluency is a question that remains to be answered. The current study hypothesized that form perception speed correlates with arithmetic fluency. Experiment 1 applied a between-subject design. 227 fifth grade students were recruited and randomly divided into two experimental groups. The groups performed the same figure-matching task, but with different stimulus durations: 400 ms or 1000 ms. The results showed that the 400 ms group had greater arithmetic fluency than the 1000 ms group, and form perception measured only in 400 ms group could explain the relationship between non-verbal number sense and arithmetic fluency. Experiment 2 applied a within-subject design. 245 fifth-grade students were recruited and all participants were administered a 400-ms figure-matching task and a 1000-ms figure-matching task. The form perception measured with 400 ms or 1000 ms duration could explain the relationship between non-verbal number sense and arithmetic fluency. These findings indicate that form perception speed underlies the association among form perception, non-verbal number sense, and arithmetic fluency.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang, Shijia & Zhou, Xinlin, 2022. "Form perception speed is critical for the relationship between non-verbal number sense and arithmetic fluency," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s016028962200085x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2022.101704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962200085X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gelman, Andrew & Stern, Hal, 2006. "The Difference Between," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 328-331, November.
    2. Justin Halberda & Michèle M. M. Mazzocco & Lisa Feigenson, 2008. "Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7213), pages 665-668, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howley, P.; & Moro, M.; & Waqas, M.; & Delaney, L.; & Heron, T.;, 2018. "Immigration and self-reported well-being in the UK," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/12, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Diana M. Hechavarría & Steven A. Brieger, 2022. "Practice rather than preach: cultural practices and female social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1131-1151, February.
    3. Thomas Neise & Franziska Sohns & Moritz Breul & Javier Revilla Diez, 2022. "The effect of natural disasters on FDI attraction: a sector-based analysis over time and space," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 999-1023, January.
    4. Colin F. Camerer & Anna Dreber & Felix Holzmeister & Teck-Hua Ho & Jürgen Huber & Magnus Johannesson & Michael Kirchler & Gideon Nave & Brian A. Nosek & Thomas Pfeiffer & Adam Altmejd & Nick Buttrick , 2018. "Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 637-644, September.
    5. Asongu, Simplice & Odhiambo, Nicholas, 2020. "The role of governance in quality education in sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 107497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ruomeng Cui & Jun Li & Dennis J. Zhang, 2020. "Reducing Discrimination with Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1071-1094, March.
    7. Lukas Haffert, 2019. "War mobilization or war destruction? The unequal rise of progressive taxation revisited," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 59-82, March.
    8. Michael A. Allen & Michael E. Flynn & Julie VanDusky-Allen, 2017. "Regions of Hierarchy and Security: US Troop Deployments, Spatial Relations, and Defense Burdens," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 397-423, May.
    9. Duxbury, Scott W, 2019. "Mediation and Moderation in Statistical Network Models," SocArXiv 9bs4u, Center for Open Science.
    10. Roberta Rutigliano & Gøsta Esping-Andersen, 2018. "Partnership Choice and Childbearing in Norway and Spain," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(3), pages 367-386, August.
    11. Jade Eloise Norris & Julie Castronovo, 2016. "Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Fabio P. Leite & Roger Ratcliff, 2011. "What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(7), pages 651-687, October.
    13. David Spiegelhalter, 2017. "Trust in numbers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(4), pages 948-965, October.
    14. Andrew P. Jaciw & Li Lin & Boya Ma, 2016. "An Empirical Study of Design Parameters for Assessing Differential Impacts for Students in Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 410-443, October.
    15. Peter Howley & Muhammad Waqas & Mirko Moro & Liam Delaney & Tony Heron, 2020. "It’s Not All about the Economy Stupid! Immigration and Subjective Well-Being in England," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(5), pages 919-936, October.
    16. Liat Goldfarb & Sharon Levy, 2013. "Counting within the Subitizing Range: The Effect of Number of Distractors on the Perception of Subset Items," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    17. Melisa Bubonya & Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Daniel Christensen & Sarah E. Johnson & Stephen R. Zubrick, 2019. "The Great Recession and Children’s Mental Health in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Nassim Nicholas Taleb, 2016. "A Short Note on P-Value Hacking," Papers 1603.07532, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    19. Anderson, Brian S. & Wennberg, Karl & McMullen, Jeffery S., 2019. "Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    20. Michèle M M Mazzocco & Lisa Feigenson & Justin Halberda, 2011. "Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-8, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s016028962200085x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.