IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0156086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Accuracy of Genomic Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Charles-Elie Rabier
  • Philippe Barre
  • Torben Asp
  • Gilles Charmet
  • Brigitte Mangin

Abstract

Genomic selection is focused on prediction of breeding values of selection candidates by means of high density of markers. It relies on the assumption that all quantitative trait loci (QTLs) tend to be in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with at least one marker. In this context, we present theoretical results regarding the accuracy of genomic selection, i.e., the correlation between predicted and true breeding values. Typically, for individuals (so-called test individuals), breeding values are predicted by means of markers, using marker effects estimated by fitting a ridge regression model to a set of training individuals. We present a theoretical expression for the accuracy; this expression is suitable for any configurations of LD between QTLs and markers. We also introduce a new accuracy proxy that is free of the QTL parameters and easily computable; it outperforms the proxies suggested in the literature, in particular, those based on an estimated effective number of independent loci (Me). The theoretical formula, the new proxy, and existing proxies were compared for simulated data, and the results point to the validity of our approach. The calculations were also illustrated on a new perennial ryegrass set (367 individuals) genotyped for 24,957 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this case, most of the proxies studied yielded similar results because of the lack of markers for coverage of the entire genome (2.7 Gb).

Suggested Citation

  • Charles-Elie Rabier & Philippe Barre & Torben Asp & Gilles Charmet & Brigitte Mangin, 2016. "On the Accuracy of Genomic Selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156086
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156086&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0156086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brendan Maher, 2008. "Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7218), pages 18-21, November.
    2. Peter Donnelly, 2008. "Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7223), pages 728-731, December.
    3. Jennifer Spindel & Hasina Begum & Deniz Akdemir & Parminder Virk & Bertrand Collard & Edilberto Redoña & Gary Atlin & Jean-Luc Jannink & Susan R McCouch, 2015. "Genomic Selection and Association Mapping in Rice (Oryza sativa): Effect of Trait Genetic Architecture, Training Population Composition, Marker Number and Statistical Model on Accuracy of Rice Genomic," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    2. Julien Frouin & Axel Labeyrie & Arnaud Boisnard & Gian Attilio Sacchi & Nourollah Ahmadi, 2019. "Genomic prediction offers the most effective marker assisted breeding approach for ability to prevent arsenic accumulation in rice grains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Karim Karimi & Mehdi Sargolzaei & Graham Stuart Plastow & Zhiquan Wang & Younes Miar, 2019. "Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marttinen Pekka & Gillberg Jussi & Havulinna Aki & Corander Jukka & Kaski Samuel, 2013. "Genome-wide association studies with high-dimensional phenotypes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 413-431, August.
    2. Yumei Yang & Qishan Wang & Qiang Chen & Rongrong Liao & Xiangzhe Zhang & Hongjie Yang & Youmin Zheng & Zhiwu Zhang & Yuchun Pan, 2014. "A New Genotype Imputation Method with Tolerance to High Missing Rate and Rare Variants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-7, June.
    3. Chung-Feng Kao & Jia-Rou Liu & Hung Hung & Po-Hsiu Kuo, 2015. "A Robust GWSS Method to Simultaneously Detect Rare and Common Variants for Complex Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    5. Dominic Russ & John A Williams & Victor Roth Cardoso & Laura Bravo-Merodio & Samantha C Pendleton & Furqan Aziz & Animesh Acharjee & Georgios V Gkoutos, 2022. "Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. von Stumm, Sophie & Kandaswamy, Radhika & Maxwell, Jessye, 2023. "Gene-environment interplay in early life cognitive development," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Janet Currie, 2011. "Ungleichheiten bei der Geburt: Einige Ursachen und Folgen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 12(s1), pages 42-65, May.
    8. Gabriela França Oliveira & Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento & Moysés Nascimento & Isabela de Castro Sant'Anna & Juan Vicente Romero & Camila Ferreira Azevedo & Leonardo Lopes Bhering & Eveline Teixeira, 2021. "Quantile regression in genomic selection for oligogenic traits in autogamous plants: A simulation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Kettlewell, Nathan & Tymula, Agnieszka & Yoo, Hong Il, 2023. "The Heritability of Economic Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 16633, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Shashaank Vattikuti & Juen Guo & Carson C Chow, 2012. "Heritability and Genetic Correlations Explained by Common SNPs for Metabolic Syndrome Traits," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
    11. Bergersen Linn Cecilie & Glad Ingrid K. & Lyng Heidi, 2011. "Weighted Lasso with Data Integration," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, August.
    12. Bingley, Paul & Cappellari, Lorenzo & Tatsiramos, Konstantinos, 2023. "On the Origins of Socio-Economic Inequalities: Evidence from Twin Families," IZA Discussion Papers 16520, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Gabriel E Hoffman & Benjamin A Logsdon & Jason G Mezey, 2013. "PUMA: A Unified Framework for Penalized Multiple Regression Analysis of GWAS Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Prabin Bajgain & James A. Anderson, 2021. "Multi-Allelic Haplotype-Based Association Analysis Identifies Genomic Regions Controlling Domestication Traits in Intermediate Wheatgrass," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage & Clementine Henri & Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon & Michel‐Yves Mistou & Rene S. Hendriksen & Tine Hald, 2019. "Machine Learning Methods as a Tool for Predicting Risk of Illness Applying Next‐Generation Sequencing Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1397-1413, June.
    16. Yunpeng Wang & Arne B Gjuvsland & Jon Olav Vik & Nicolas P Smith & Peter J Hunter & Stig W Omholt, 2012. "Parameters in Dynamic Models of Complex Traits are Containers of Missing Heritability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, April.
    17. Christian Magnus Page & Sergio E Baranzini & Bjørn-Helge Mevik & Steffan Daniel Bos & Hanne F Harbo & Bettina Kulle Andreassen, 2015. "Assessing the Power of Exome Chips," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Diana Chang & Feng Gao & Andrea Slavney & Li Ma & Yedael Y Waldman & Aaron J Sams & Paul Billing-Ross & Aviv Madar & Richard Spritz & Alon Keinan, 2014. "Accounting for eXentricities: Analysis of the X Chromosome in GWAS Reveals X-Linked Genes Implicated in Autoimmune Diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-31, December.
    19. Hou-Feng Zheng & Jing-Jing Rong & Ming Liu & Fang Han & Xing-Wei Zhang & J Brent Richards & Li Wang, 2015. "Performance of Genotype Imputation for Low Frequency and Rare Variants from the 1000 Genomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, January.
    20. Md. S. Islam & Per McCord & Quentin D. Read & Lifang Qin & Alexander E. Lipka & Sushma Sood & James Todd & Marcus Olatoye, 2022. "Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.