IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v70y2021i4p1001-1026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Charles‐Elie Rabier
  • Simona Grusea

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) consists in predicting breeding values of selection candidates, using a large number of genetic markers. An important question in GS is to determine the number of markers required for a good prediction. For this purpose, we introduce new proxies for the accuracy of the prediction. These proxies are suitable under sparse genetic map where it is likely to observe some imperfect linkage disequilibrium, that is, the situation where the alleles at a gene location and at a marker located nearby vary. Moreover, our suggested proxies are helpful for designing cost‐effective SNP chips based on a moderate density of markers. We analyse rice data from Los Banos, Philippines and focus on the flowering time collected during the dry season 2012. Using different densities of markers, we show that at least 1553 markers are required to implement GS. Finding the optimal number of markers is crucial in order to optimize the breeding program.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:70:y:2021:i:4:p:1001-1026
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12496
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Xiao-Lin Wu & Jiaqi Xu & Guofei Feng & George R Wiggans & Jeremy F Taylor & Jun He & Changsong Qian & Jiansheng Qiu & Barry Simpson & Jeremy Walker & Stewart Bauck, 2016. "Optimal Design of Low-Density SNP Arrays for Genomic Prediction: Algorithm and Applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-36, September.
    3. Gad Abraham & Jason A Tye-Din & Oneil G Bhalala & Adam Kowalczyk & Justin Zobel & Michael Inouye, 2014. "Accurate and Robust Genomic Prediction of Celiac Disease Using Statistical Learning," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Charles-Elie Rabier & Philippe Barre & Torben Asp & Gilles Charmet & Brigitte Mangin, 2016. "On the Accuracy of Genomic Selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    6. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2006. "Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-67, February.
    7. Jennifer Spindel & Hasina Begum & Deniz Akdemir & Parminder Virk & Bertrand Collard & Edilberto Redoña & Gary Atlin & Jean-Luc Jannink & Susan R McCouch, 2015. "Genomic Selection and Association Mapping in Rice (Oryza sativa): Effect of Trait Genetic Architecture, Training Population Composition, Marker Number and Statistical Model on Accuracy of Rice Genomic," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Huicong Yu & Jiaqi Wu & Weiping Zhang, 2024. "Simultaneous subgroup identification and variable selection for high dimensional data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 3181-3205, September.
    3. Ricardo P. Masini & Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2023. "Machine learning advances for time series forecasting," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 76-111, February.
    4. Zhenghui Feng & Lu Lin & Ruoqing Zhu & Lixing Zhu, 2020. "Nonparametric variable selection and its application to additive models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(3), pages 827-854, June.
    5. Xue Wu & Chixiang Chen & Zheng Li & Lijun Zhang & Vernon M. Chinchilli & Ming Wang, 2024. "A three-stage approach to identify biomarker signatures for cancer genetic data with survival endpoints," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 863-883, July.
    6. He, Yong & Zhang, Liang & Ji, Jiadong & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 568-582.
    7. Min Chen & Yimin Lian & Zhao Chen & Zhengjun Zhang, 2017. "Sure explained variability and independence screening," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 849-883, October.
    8. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Xin-Bing Kong & Zhi Liu & Yuan Yao & Wang Zhou, 2017. "Sure screening by ranking the canonical correlations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 46-70, March.
    10. Liang, Chong & Schienle, Melanie, 2019. "Determination of vector error correction models in high dimensions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 418-441.
    11. Armin Rauschenberger & Iuliana Ciocănea-Teodorescu & Marianne A. Jonker & Renée X. Menezes & Mark A. Wiel, 2020. "Sparse classification with paired covariates," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 571-588, September.
    12. Aneiros, Germán & Novo, Silvia & Vieu, Philippe, 2022. "Variable selection in functional regression models: A review," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Liming Wang & Xingxiang Li & Xiaoqing Wang & Peng Lai, 2022. "Unified mean-variance feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1887-1918, September.
    14. Bai, Ray & Ghosh, Malay, 2018. "High-dimensional multivariate posterior consistency under global–local shrinkage priors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 157-170.
    15. Xia, Xiaochao & Yang, Hu & Li, Jialiang, 2016. "Feature screening for generalized varying coefficient models with application to dichotomous responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 85-97.
    16. He, Xin & Mao, Xiaojun & Wang, Zhonglei, 2024. "Nonparametric augmented probability weighting with sparsity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Bergersen Linn Cecilie & Glad Ingrid K. & Lyng Heidi, 2011. "Weighted Lasso with Data Integration," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, August.
    18. Qing Zhou & Seunghyun Min, 2017. "Uncertainty quantification under group sparsity," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(3), pages 613-632.
    19. Gabriel E Hoffman & Benjamin A Logsdon & Jason G Mezey, 2013. "PUMA: A Unified Framework for Penalized Multiple Regression Analysis of GWAS Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Gerda Claeskens, 2012. "Focused estimation and model averaging with penalization methods: an overview," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 66(3), pages 272-287, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:70:y:2021:i:4:p:1001-1026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.