IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0044894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Estimates of Correlation between Motor Unit Activities in Humans

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Negro
  • Dario Farina

Abstract

Background: Alpha motoneurons receive common synaptic inputs from spinal and supraspinal pathways. As a result, a certain degree of correlation can be observed between motoneuron spike trains during voluntary contractions. This has been studied by using correlation measures in the time and frequency domains. These measures are interpreted as reflecting different types of connectivity in the spinal networks, although the relation between the degree of correlation of the output motoneuron spike trains and of their synaptic inputs is unclear. Methodology/Principal Findings: In this study, we analyze theoretically this relation and we complete this analysis by simulations and experimental data on the abductor digiti minimi muscle. The results demonstrate that correlation measures between motoneuron output spike trains are inherently influenced by the discharge rate and that this influence cannot be compensated by normalization. Because of the influence of discharge rate, frequency domain measures of correlation (coherence) do not identify the full frequency content of the common input signal when computed from pairs of motoneurons. Rather, an increase in sampling rate is needed by using cumulative spike trains of several motoneurons. Moreover, the application of averaging filters to the spike trains influences the magnitude of the estimated correlation levels calculated in the time, but not in the frequency domain (coherence). Conclusions: It is concluded that the analysis of coherence in different frequency bands between cumulative spike trains of a sufficient number of motoneurons provides information on the spectrum of the common synaptic input. Nonetheless, the absolute values of coherent peaks cannot be compared across conditions with different cumulative discharge rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Negro & Dario Farina, 2012. "Factors Influencing the Estimates of Correlation between Motor Unit Activities in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0044894
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044894
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044894&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0044894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaime de la Rocha & Brent Doiron & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić & Alex Reyes, 2007. "Correlation between neural spike trains increases with firing rate," Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7155), pages 802-806, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Negro & Utku Ş Yavuz & Dario Farina, 2014. "Limitations of the Spike-Triggered Averaging for Estimating Motor Unit Twitch Force: A Theoretical Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Gaëlle Desbordes & Jianzhong Jin & Chong Weng & Nicholas A Lesica & Garrett B Stanley & Jose-Manuel Alonso, 2008. "Timing Precision in Population Coding of Natural Scenes in the Early Visual System," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Corentin Massot & Adam D Schneider & Maurice J Chacron & Kathleen E Cullen, 2012. "The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Usman Farooq & George Dragoi, 2024. "Experience of Euclidean geometry sculpts the development and dynamics of rodent hippocampal sequential cell assemblies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Robert Loshkarev & Dmitry Postnov, 2021. "Toward Minimalistic Model of Cellular Volume Dynamics in Neurovascular Unit," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    9. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
    10. Geoffrey Terral & Evan Harrell & Gabriel Lepousez & Yohan Wards & Dinghuang Huang & Tiphaine Dolique & Giulio Casali & Antoine Nissant & Pierre-Marie Lledo & Guillaume Ferreira & Giovanni Marsicano & , 2024. "Endogenous cannabinoids in the piriform cortex tune olfactory perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Michelle F Craft & Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2021. "Differences in olfactory bulb mitral cell spiking with ortho- and retronasal stimulation revealed by data-driven models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Tom Tetzlaff & Moritz Helias & Gaute T Einevoll & Markus Diesmann, 2012. "Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    13. James Trousdale & Yu Hu & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić, 2012. "Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Moritz Helias & Tom Tetzlaff & Markus Diesmann, 2014. "The Correlation Structure of Local Neuronal Networks Intrinsically Results from Recurrent Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Yu Hu & Joel Zylberberg & Eric Shea-Brown, 2014. "The Sign Rule and Beyond: Boundary Effects, Flexibility, and Noise Correlations in Neural Population Codes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Stefano Recanatesi & Gabriel Koch Ocker & Michael A Buice & Eric Shea-Brown, 2019. "Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: Global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, July.
    17. Moritz Helias & Moritz Deger & Stefan Rotter & Markus Diesmann, 2010. "Instantaneous Non-Linear Processing by Pulse-Coupled Threshold Units," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    18. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Andrea K Barreiro & Cheng Ly, 2017. "When do correlations increase with firing rates in recurrent networks?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0044894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.