IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing and dissociating multiple time-varying modulatory computations influencing neuronal activity

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiser Niknam
  • Amir Akbarian
  • Kelsey Clark
  • Yasin Zamani
  • Behrad Noudoost
  • Neda Nategh

Abstract

In many brain areas, sensory responses are heavily modulated by factors including attentional state, context, reward history, motor preparation, learned associations, and other cognitive variables. Modelling the effect of these modulatory factors on sensory responses has proven challenging, mostly due to the time-varying and nonlinear nature of the underlying computations. Here we present a computational model capable of capturing and dissociating multiple time-varying modulatory effects on neuronal responses on the order of milliseconds. The model’s performance is tested on extrastriate perisaccadic visual responses in nonhuman primates. Visual neurons respond to stimuli presented around the time of saccades differently than during fixation. These perisaccadic changes include sensitivity to the stimuli presented at locations outside the neuron’s receptive field, which suggests a contribution of multiple sources to perisaccadic response generation. Current computational approaches cannot quantitatively characterize the contribution of each modulatory source in response generation, mainly due to the very short timescale on which the saccade takes place. In this study, we use a high spatiotemporal resolution experimental paradigm along with a novel extension of the generalized linear model framework (GLM), termed the sparse-variable GLM, to allow for time-varying model parameters representing the temporal evolution of the system with a resolution on the order of milliseconds. We used this model framework to precisely map the temporal evolution of the spatiotemporal receptive field of visual neurons in the middle temporal area during the execution of a saccade. Moreover, an extended model based on a factorization of the sparse-variable GLM allowed us to disassociate and quantify the contribution of individual sources to the perisaccadic response. Our results show that our novel framework can precisely capture the changes in sensitivity of neurons around the time of saccades, and provide a general framework to quantitatively track the role of multiple modulatory sources over time.Author summary: The sensory responses of neurons in many brain areas, particularly those in higher prefrontal or parietal areas, are strongly influenced by factors including task rules, attentional state, context, reward history, motor preparation, learned associations, and other cognitive variables. These modulations often occur in combination, or on fast timescales which present a challenge for both experimental and modelling approaches aiming to describe the underlying mechanisms or computations. Here we present a computational model capable of capturing and dissociating multiple time-varying modulatory effects on spiking responses on the order of milliseconds. The model’s performance is evaluated by testing its ability to reproduce and dissociate multiple changes in visual sensitivity occurring in extrastriate visual cortex around the time of rapid eye movements. No previous model is capable of capturing these changes with as fine a resolution as that presented here. Our model both provides specific insight into the nature and time course of changes in visual sensitivity around the time of eye movements, and offers a general framework applicable to a wide variety of contexts in which sensory processing is modulated dynamically by multiple time-varying cognitive or behavioral factors, to understand the neuronal computations underpinning these modulations and make predictions about the underlying mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiser Niknam & Amir Akbarian & Kelsey Clark & Yasin Zamani & Behrad Noudoost & Neda Nategh, 2019. "Characterizing and dissociating multiple time-varying modulatory computations influencing neuronal activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-38, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sujaya Neupane & Daniel Guitton & Christopher C. Pack, 2016. "Two distinct types of remapping in primate cortical area V4," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Marc Zirnsak & Nicholas A. Steinmetz & Behrad Noudoost & Kitty Z. Xu & Tirin Moore, 2014. "Visual space is compressed in prefrontal cortex before eye movements," Nature, Nature, vol. 507(7493), pages 504-507, March.
    3. John Ross & M. Concetta Morrone & David C. Burr, 1997. "Compression of visual space before saccades," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6625), pages 598-601, April.
    4. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Marc A. Sommer & Robert H. Wurtz, 2006. "Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7117), pages 374-377, November.
    6. Tatyana O. Sharpee & Hiroki Sugihara & Andrei V. Kurgansky & Sergei P. Rebrik & Michael P. Stryker & Kenneth D. Miller, 2006. "Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7079), pages 936-942, February.
    7. Ross S Williamson & Maneesh Sahani & Jonathan W Pillow, 2015. "The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Akbarian & Kelsey Clark & Behrad Noudoost & Neda Nategh, 2021. "A sensory memory to preserve visual representations across eye movements," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Geyu Weng & Amir Akbarian & Kelsey Clark & Behrad Noudoost & Neda Nategh, 2024. "Neural correlates of perisaccadic visual mislocalization in extrastriate cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Arne F Meyer & Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock & Max F K Happel & Frank W Ohl & Jörn Anemüller, 2014. "Discriminative Learning of Receptive Fields from Responses to Non-Gaussian Stimulus Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Zhaoran Zhang & Edward Zagha, 2023. "Motor cortex gates distractor stimulus encoding in sensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Tom J Van Grootel & Robert F Van der Willigen & A John Van Opstal, 2012. "Experimental Test of Spatial Updating Models for Monkey Eye-Head Gaze Shifts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    7. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Whiteley, Nick, 2021. "Dimension-free Wasserstein contraction of nonlinear filters," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-50.
    9. Jeroen Atsma & Femke Maij & Mathieu Koppen & David E Irwin & W Pieter Medendorp, 2016. "Causal Inference for Spatial Constancy across Saccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Jonathan Schaffner & Sherry Dongqi Bao & Philippe N. Tobler & Todd A. Hare & Rafael Polania, 2023. "Sensory perception relies on fitness-maximizing codes," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1135-1151, July.
    11. Miguel Maravall & Rasmus S Petersen & Adrienne L Fairhall & Ehsan Arabzadeh & Mathew E Diamond, 2007. "Shifts in Coding Properties and Maintenance of Information Transmission during Adaptation in Barrel Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Johnatan Aljadeff & Ronen Segev & Michael J Berry II & Tatyana O Sharpee, 2013. "Spike Triggered Covariance in Strongly Correlated Gaussian Stimuli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Montangie, Lisandro & Montani, Fernando, 2017. "Higher-order correlations in common input shapes the output spiking activity of a neural population," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 845-861.
    14. Marcus H C Howlett & Robert G Smith & Maarten Kamermans, 2017. "A novel mechanism of cone photoreceptor adaptation," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Montangie, Lisandro & Montani, Fernando, 2015. "Quantifying higher-order correlations in a neuronal pool," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 388-400.
    16. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Klaus Wimmer & K Jannis Hildebrandt & R Matthias Hennig & Klaus Obermayer, 2008. "Adaptation and Selective Information Transmission in the Cricket Auditory Neuron AN2," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.