IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Ross S Williamson
  • Maneesh Sahani
  • Jonathan W Pillow

Abstract

Stimulus dimensionality-reduction methods in neuroscience seek to identify a low-dimensional space of stimulus features that affect a neuron’s probability of spiking. One popular method, known as maximally informative dimensions (MID), uses an information-theoretic quantity known as “single-spike information” to identify this space. Here we examine MID from a model-based perspective. We show that MID is a maximum-likelihood estimator for the parameters of a linear-nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) model, and that the empirical single-spike information corresponds to the normalized log-likelihood under a Poisson model. This equivalence implies that MID does not necessarily find maximally informative stimulus dimensions when spiking is not well described as Poisson. We provide several examples to illustrate this shortcoming, and derive a lower bound on the information lost when spiking is Bernoulli in discrete time bins. To overcome this limitation, we introduce model-based dimensionality reduction methods for neurons with non-Poisson firing statistics, and show that they can be framed equivalently in likelihood-based or information-theoretic terms. Finally, we show how to overcome practical limitations on the number of stimulus dimensions that MID can estimate by constraining the form of the non-parametric nonlinearity in an LNP model. We illustrate these methods with simulations and data from primate visual cortex.Author Summary: A popular approach to the neural coding problem is to identify a low-dimensional linear projection of the stimulus space that preserves the aspects of the stimulus that affect a neuron’s probability of spiking. Previous work has focused on both information-theoretic and likelihood-based estimators for finding such projections. Here, we show that these two approaches are in fact equivalent. We show that maximally informative dimensions (MID), a popular information-theoretic method for dimensionality reduction, is identical to the maximum-likelihood estimator for a particular linear-nonlinear encoding model with Poisson spiking. One implication of this equivalence is that MID may not find the information-theoretically optimal stimulus projection when spiking is non-Poisson, which we illustrate with a few simple examples. Using these insights, we propose novel dimensionality-reduction methods that incorporate non-Poisson spiking, and suggest new parametrizations that allow for tractable estimation of high-dimensional subspaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross S Williamson & Maneesh Sahani & Jonathan W Pillow, 2015. "The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004141
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004141&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucas Theis & Andrè Maia Chagas & Daniel Arnstein & Cornelius Schwarz & Matthias Bethge, 2013. "Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    2. Elad Schneidman & Michael J. Berry & Ronen Segev & William Bialek, 2006. "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1007-1012, April.
    3. James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jeffrey D Fitzgerald & Ryan J Rowekamp & Lawrence C Sincich & Tatyana O Sharpee, 2011. "Second Order Dimensionality Reduction Using Minimum and Maximum Mutual Information Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    5. Mijung Park & Jonathan W Pillow, 2011. "Receptive Field Inference with Localized Priors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Kaiser Niknam & Amir Akbarian & Kelsey Clark & Yasin Zamani & Behrad Noudoost & Neda Nategh, 2019. "Characterizing and dissociating multiple time-varying modulatory computations influencing neuronal activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-38, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Lucas Theis & Andrè Maia Chagas & Daniel Arnstein & Cornelius Schwarz & Matthias Bethge, 2013. "Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jian K Liu & Tim Gollisch, 2015. "Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Lipovetsky, Stan, 2018. "Quantum paradigm of probability amplitude and complex utility in entangled discrete choice modeling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 62-73.
    6. Mark L Ioffe & Michael J Berry II, 2017. "The structured ‘low temperature’ phase of the retinal population code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Katarína Bod’ová & Enikő Szép & Nicholas H Barton, 2021. "Dynamic maximum entropy provides accurate approximation of structured population dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. MohammadReza Zahedian & Mahsa Bagherikalhor & Andrey Trufanov & G. Reza Jafari, 2022. "Financial Crisis in the Framework of Non-zero Temperature Balance Theory," Papers 2202.03198, arXiv.org.
    9. Gaëlle Desbordes & Jianzhong Jin & Chong Weng & Nicholas A Lesica & Garrett B Stanley & Jose-Manuel Alonso, 2008. "Timing Precision in Population Coding of Natural Scenes in the Early Visual System," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Maulana, Ardian & Situngkir, Hokky, 2015. "Korelasi Bebas-skala dalam Studi Geo-politik Pemilihan [Scale-free correlation within Geopolitics of Election Studies]," MPRA Paper 66351, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Sepp Kollmorgen & Richard H R Hahnloser, 2014. "Dynamic Alignment Models for Neural Coding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Johannes Burge & Priyank Jaini, 2017. "Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, February.
    14. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Xiaoyuan Liu & Hayato Ushijima-Mwesigwa & Avradip Mandal & Sarvagya Upadhyay & Ilya Safro & Arnab Roy, 2022. "Leveraging special-purpose hardware for local search heuristics," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 1-29, May.
    17. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    18. Sahar Gelfman & Quanli Wang & Yi-Fan Lu & Diana Hall & Christopher D Bostick & Ryan Dhindsa & Matt Halvorsen & K Melodi McSweeney & Ellese Cotterill & Tom Edinburgh & Michael A Beaumont & Wayne N Fran, 2018. "meaRtools: An R package for the analysis of neuronal networks recorded on microelectrode arrays," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    20. Simona Cocco & Remi Monasson & Martin Weigt, 2013. "From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.