IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian hypothesis testing and experimental design for two-photon imaging data

Author

Listed:
  • Luke E Rogerson
  • Zhijian Zhao
  • Katrin Franke
  • Thomas Euler
  • Philipp Berens

Abstract

Variability, stochastic or otherwise, is a central feature of neural activity. Yet the means by which estimates of variation and uncertainty are derived from noisy observations of neural activity is often heuristic, with more weight given to numerical convenience than statistical rigour. For two-photon imaging data, composed of fundamentally probabilistic streams of photon detections, the problem is particularly acute. Here, we present a statistical pipeline for the inference and analysis of neural activity using Gaussian Process regression, applied to two-photon recordings of light-driven activity in ex vivo mouse retina. We demonstrate the flexibility and extensibility of these models, considering cases with non-stationary statistics, driven by complex parametric stimuli, in signal discrimination, hierarchical clustering and other inference tasks. Sparse approximation methods allow these models to be fitted rapidly, permitting them to actively guide the design of light stimulation in the midst of ongoing two-photon experiments.Author summary: There are many sources of noise in recordings of neural activity, and the first challenge in neural data analysis is to separate this noise from experimentally relevant variation. This is particularly problematic for two-photon imaging data. Two-photon imaging uses fluorescent indicators to measure changes in the concentration of molecules involved in cell signalling, and adds a variety of numerical, biological and optical noise sources. We present a method for disentangling this signal and noise using Gaussian processes, a family of probabilistic models which provide a principled way of inferring mean activity and variability. In addition to signal recovery, we show that these models can test the evidence for whether and where two signals are different and that these tests can be used to look for groups in sets of signals. We explore how these models can be extended to predict how signals will change under different experimental conditions, and that these predictions can be used to select new conditions for further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke E Rogerson & Zhijian Zhao & Katrin Franke & Thomas Euler & Philipp Berens, 2019. "Bayesian hypothesis testing and experimental design for two-photon imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007205
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007205&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katrin Franke & Philipp Berens & Timm Schubert & Matthias Bethge & Thomas Euler & Tom Baden, 2017. "Inhibition decorrelates visual feature representations in the inner retina," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7642), pages 439-444, February.
    2. Tom Baden & Philipp Berens & Katrin Franke & Miroslav Román Rosón & Matthias Bethge & Thomas Euler, 2016. "The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7586), pages 345-350, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Swygart & Wan-Qing Yu & Shunsuke Takeuchi & Rachel O. L. Wong & Gregory W. Schwartz, 2024. "A presynaptic source drives differing levels of surround suppression in two mouse retinal ganglion cell types," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Luca Sità & Marco Brondi & Pedro Lagomarsino de Leon Roig & Sebastiano Curreli & Mariangela Panniello & Dania Vecchia & Tommaso Fellin, 2022. "A deep-learning approach for online cell identification and trace extraction in functional two-photon calcium imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline Cornean & Sebastian Molina-Obando & Burak Gür & Annika Bast & Giordano Ramos-Traslosheros & Jonas Chojetzki & Lena Lörsch & Maria Ioannidou & Rachita Taneja & Christopher Schnaitmann & Mari, 2024. "Heterogeneity of synaptic connectivity in the fly visual system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. David Swygart & Wan-Qing Yu & Shunsuke Takeuchi & Rachel O. L. Wong & Gregory W. Schwartz, 2024. "A presynaptic source drives differing levels of surround suppression in two mouse retinal ganglion cell types," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Héctor Acarón Ledesma & Jennifer Ding & Swen Oosterboer & Xiaolin Huang & Qiang Chen & Sui Wang & Michael Z. Lin & Wei Wei, 2024. "Dendritic mGluR2 and perisomatic Kv3 signaling regulate dendritic computation of mouse starburst amacrine cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. John A. Gaynes & Samuel A. Budoff & Michael J. Grybko & Joshua B. Hunt & Alon Poleg-Polsky, 2022. "Classical center-surround receptive fields facilitate novel object detection in retinal bipolar cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jen-Chun Hsiang & Ning Shen & Florentina Soto & Daniel Kerschensteiner, 2024. "Distributed feature representations of natural stimuli across parallel retinal pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Dominic J. Vita & Fernanda S. Orsi & Nathan G. Stanko & Natalie A. Clark & Alexandre Tiriac, 2024. "Development and organization of the retinal orientation selectivity map," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Lei Wang & Xin Liu & Yin Zhang, 2023. "A communication-efficient and privacy-aware distributed algorithm for sparse PCA," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 1033-1072, July.
    8. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Jérémie Sibille & Carolin Gehr & Jonathan I. Benichov & Hymavathy Balasubramanian & Kai Lun Teh & Tatiana Lupashina & Daniela Vallentin & Jens Kremkow, 2022. "High-density electrode recordings reveal strong and specific connections between retinal ganglion cells and midbrain neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Andrew Jo & Sercan Deniz & Jian Xu & Robert M. Duvoisin & Steven H. DeVries & Yongling Zhu, 2023. "A sign-inverted receptive field of inhibitory interneurons provides a pathway for ON-OFF interactions in the retina," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Yeon Jin Kim & Beth B. Peterson & Joanna D. Crook & Hannah R. Joo & Jiajia Wu & Christian Puller & Farrel R. Robinson & Paul D. Gamlin & King-Wai Yau & Felix Viana & John B. Troy & Robert G. Smith & O, 2022. "Origins of direction selectivity in the primate retina," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Andrew Jo & Sercan Deniz & Suraj Cherian & Jian Xu & Daiki Futagi & Steven H. DeVries & Yongling Zhu, 2023. "Modular interneuron circuits control motion sensitivity in the mouse retina," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Niru Maheswaranathan & David B Kastner & Stephen A Baccus & Surya Ganguli, 2018. "Inferring hidden structure in multilayered neural circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    14. Chad P. Grabner & Daiki Futagi & Jun Shi & Vytas Bindokas & Katsunori Kitano & Eric A. Schwartz & Steven H. DeVries, 2023. "Mechanisms of simultaneous linear and nonlinear computations at the mammalian cone photoreceptor synapse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Yajie Liang & Rongwen Lu & Katharine Borges & Na Ji, 2023. "Stimulus edges induce orientation tuning in superior colliculus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Toshiyuki Ishii & Toshihiko Hosoya, 2020. "Interspike intervals within retinal spike bursts combinatorially encode multiple stimulus features," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-30, November.
    17. Matías A. Goldin & Baptiste Lefebvre & Samuele Virgili & Mathieu Kim Pham Van Cang & Alexander Ecker & Thierry Mora & Ulisse Ferrari & Olivier Marre, 2022. "Context-dependent selectivity to natural images in the retina," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Dmitry Molotkov & Leiron Ferrarese & Tom Boissonnet & Hiroki Asari, 2023. "Topographic axonal projection at single-cell precision supports local retinotopy in the mouse superior colliculus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Marvin Seifert & Paul A. Roberts & George Kafetzis & Daniel Osorio & Tom Baden, 2023. "Birds multiplex spectral and temporal visual information via retinal On- and Off-channels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Oleksandr Sorochynskyi & Stéphane Deny & Olivier Marre & Ulisse Ferrari, 2021. "Predicting synchronous firing of large neural populations from sequential recordings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.