IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Point process analysis of noise in early invertebrate vision

Author

Listed:
  • Kris V Parag
  • Glenn Vinnicombe

Abstract

Noise is a prevalent and sometimes even dominant aspect of many biological processes. While many natural systems have adapted to attenuate or even usefully integrate noise, the variability it introduces often still delimits the achievable precision across biological functions. This is particularly so for visual phototransduction, the process responsible for converting photons of light into usable electrical signals (quantum bumps). Here, randomness of both the photon inputs (regarded as extrinsic noise) and the conversion process (intrinsic noise) are seen as two distinct, independent and significant limitations on visual reliability. Past research has attempted to quantify the relative effects of these noise sources by using approximate methods that do not fully account for the discrete, point process and time ordered nature of the problem. As a result the conclusions drawn from these different approaches have led to inconsistent expositions of phototransduction noise performance.This paper provides a fresh and complete analysis of the relative impact of intrinsic and extrinsic noise in invertebrate phototransduction using minimum mean squared error reconstruction techniques based on Bayesian point process (Snyder) filters. An integrate-fire based algorithm is developed to reliably estimate photon times from quantum bumps and Snyder filters are then used to causally estimate random light intensities both at the front and back end of the phototransduction cascade. Comparison of these estimates reveals that the dominant noise source transitions from extrinsic to intrinsic as light intensity increases. By extending the filtering techniques to account for delays, it is further found that among the intrinsic noise components, which include bump latency (mean delay and jitter) and shape (amplitude and width) variance, it is the mean delay that is critical to noise performance. As the timeliness of visual information is important for real-time action, this delay could potentially limit the speed at which invertebrates can respond to stimuli. Consequently, if one wants to increase visual fidelity, reducing the photoconversion lag is much more important than improving the regularity of the electrical signal.Author summary: The invertebrate phototransduction system captures and converts environmental light inputs into electrical signals for use in later visual processing. Consequently, one would expect it to be optimised in some way to ensure that only a minimal amount of environmental information is lost during conversion. Confirming this requires an understanding and quantification of the performance limiting noise sources. Photons, which are inherently random and discrete, introduce extrinsic noise. The phototransduction cascade, which converts photons into electrical bumps possessing non-deterministic shapes and latencies, contributes intrinsic noise. Previous work on characterising the relative impact of all these sources did not account for the discrete, causal, point process nature of the problem and thus results were often inconclusive. Here we use non-linear Poisson process filtering to show that photon noise is dominant at low light intensity and cascade noise limiting at high intensity. Further, our analysis reveals that mean bump delay is the most deleterious aspect of the intrinsic noise. Our work emphasises a new approach to assessing sensory noise and provides the first complete description and evaluation of the relative impact of noise in phototransduction that does not rely on continuity, linearity or Gaussian approximations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kris V Parag & Glenn Vinnicombe, 2017. "Point process analysis of noise in early invertebrate vision," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005687
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005687
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005687&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilya Nemenman & Geoffrey D Lewen & William Bialek & Rob R de Ruyter van Steveninck, 2008. "Neural Coding of Natural Stimuli: Information at Sub-Millisecond Resolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Jan Grewe & Matti Weckström & Martin Egelhaaf & Anne-Kathrin Warzecha, 2007. "Information and Discriminability as Measures of Reliability of Sensory Coding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Sanggyun Kim & David Putrino & Soumya Ghosh & Emery N Brown, 2011. "A Granger Causality Measure for Point Process Models of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Roger C. Hardie & Padinjat Raghu, 2001. "Visual transduction in Drosophila," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6852), pages 186-193, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Zane N Aldworth & Alexander G Dimitrov & Graham I Cummins & Tomáš Gedeon & John P Miller, 2011. "Temporal Encoding in a Nervous System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Lubomir Kostal & Petr Lansky & Ondrej Pokora, 2011. "Variability Measures of Positive Random Variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Alexander B Neiman & David F Russell & Michael H Rowe, 2011. "Identifying Temporal Codes in Spontaneously Active Sensory Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Etesami, Jalal & Habibnia, Ali & Kiyavash, Negar, 2017. "Econometric modeling of systemic risk: going beyond pairwise comparison and allowing for nonlinearity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70769, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Matthieu Gilson & Ruben Moreno-Bote & Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Petra Ritter & Gustavo Deco, 2016. "Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Antonino Casile & Rose T Faghih & Emery N Brown, 2021. "Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Qin, Qing & Deng, Yun & Wang, Jiang & Liu, Jing & Cao, Yibin, 2017. "Synchrony dynamics underlying effective connectivity reconstruction of neuronal circuits," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 674-687.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.