IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hierarchical Neuronal Model for Generation and Online Recognition of Birdsongs

Author

Listed:
  • Izzet B Yildiz
  • Stefan J Kiebel

Abstract

The neuronal system underlying learning, generation and recognition of song in birds is one of the best-studied systems in the neurosciences. Here, we use these experimental findings to derive a neurobiologically plausible, dynamic, hierarchical model of birdsong generation and transform it into a functional model of birdsong recognition. The generation model consists of neuronal rate models and includes critical anatomical components like the premotor song-control nucleus HVC (proper name), the premotor nucleus RA (robust nucleus of the arcopallium), and a model of the syringeal and respiratory organs. We use Bayesian inference of this dynamical system to derive a possible mechanism for how birds can efficiently and robustly recognize the songs of their conspecifics in an online fashion. Our results indicate that the specific way birdsong is generated enables a listening bird to robustly and rapidly perceive embedded information at multiple time scales of a song. The resulting mechanism can be useful for investigating the functional roles of auditory recognition areas and providing predictions for future birdsong experiments. Author Summary: How do birds communicate via their songs? Investigating this question may not only lead to a better understanding of communication via birdsong, but many believe that the answer will also give us hints about how humans decode speech from complex sound wave modulations. In birds, the output and neuronal responses of the song generation system can be measured precisely and this has resulted in a considerable body of experimental findings. We used these findings to assemble a complete model of birdsong generation and use it as the basis for constructing a potentially neurobiologically plausible, artificial recognition system based on state-of-the-art Bayesian inference techniques. Our artificial system resembles the real birdsong system when performing recognition tasks and may be used as a functional model to explain and predict experimental findings in song recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Izzet B Yildiz & Stefan J Kiebel, 2011. "A Hierarchical Neuronal Model for Generation and Online Recognition of Birdsongs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002303
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002303&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard H. R. Hahnloser & Alexay A. Kozhevnikov & Michale S. Fee, 2002. "An ultra-sparse code underliesthe generation of neural sequences in a songbird," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6902), pages 65-70, September.
    2. Karl Friston, 2008. "Hierarchical Models in the Brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Barbara Ballentine & Jeremy Hyman & Stephen Nowicki, 2004. "Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(1), pages 163-168, January.
    4. Stefan J Kiebel & Jean Daunizeau & Karl J Friston, 2008. "A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Michael A. Long & Dezhe Z. Jin & Michale S. Fee, 2010. "Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7322), pages 394-399, November.
    6. Georg B. Keller & Richard H. R. Hahnloser, 2009. "Neural processing of auditory feedback during vocal practice in a songbird," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7226), pages 187-190, January.
    7. Michael A. Long & Michale S. Fee, 2008. "Using temperature to analyse temporal dynamics in the songbird motor pathway," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7219), pages 189-194, November.
    8. Mimi H. Kao & Allison J. Doupe & Michael S. Brainard, 2005. "Contributions of an avian basal ganglia–forebrain circuit to real-time modulation of song," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7026), pages 638-643, February.
    9. Gary J. Rose & Franz Goller & Howard J. Gritton & Stephanie L. Plamondon & Alexander T. Baugh & Brenton G. Cooper, 2004. "Species-typical songs in white-crowned sparrows tutored with only phrase pairs," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7018), pages 753-758, December.
    10. J. F. Prather & S. Peters & S. Nowicki & R. Mooney, 2008. "Precise auditory–vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7176), pages 305-310, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabian Heim & Ezequiel Mendoza & Avani Koparkar & Daniela Vallentin, 2024. "Disinhibition enables vocal repertoire expansion after a critical period," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Stefan J Kiebel & Katharina von Kriegstein & Jean Daunizeau & Karl J Friston, 2009. "Recognizing Sequences of Sequences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Linda Bistere & Carlos M. Gomez-Guzman & Yirong Xiong & Daniela Vallentin, 2024. "Female calls promote song learning in male juvenile zebra finches," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Matthew A Slayton & Juan L Romero-Sosa & Katrina Shore & Dean V Buonomano & Indre V Viskontas, 2020. "Musical expertise generalizes to superior temporal scaling in a Morse code tapping task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Dionysios Perdikis & Raoul Huys & Viktor K Jirsa, 2011. "Time Scale Hierarchies in the Functional Organization of Complex Behaviors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Dionysios Perdikis & Raoul Huys & Viktor Jirsa, 2011. "Complex Processes from Dynamical Architectures with Time-Scale Hierarchy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Benjamin M. Zemel & Alexander A. Nevue & Andre Dagostin & Peter V. Lovell & Claudio V. Mello & Henrique Gersdorff, 2021. "Resurgent Na+ currents promote ultrafast spiking in projection neurons that drive fine motor control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Dezhe Z Jin & Alexay A Kozhevnikov, 2011. "A Compact Statistical Model of the Song Syntax in Bengalese Finch," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Micha Heilbron & Florent Meyniel, 2019. "Confidence resets reveal hierarchical adaptive learning in humans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.
    10. John C. Boik, 2020. "Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Joshua M Mueller & Primoz Ravbar & Julie H Simpson & Jean M Carlson, 2019. "Drosophila melanogaster grooming possesses syntax with distinct rules at different temporal scales," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Sepp Kollmorgen & Richard H R Hahnloser, 2014. "Dynamic Alignment Models for Neural Coding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Mateus Joffily & Giorgio Coricelli, 2013. "Emotional Valence and the Free-Energy Principle," Post-Print halshs-00834063, HAL.
    14. Timothy Verstynen & Jeff Phillips & Emily Braun & Brett Workman & Christian Schunn & Walter Schneider, 2012. "Dynamic Sensorimotor Planning during Long-Term Sequence Learning: The Role of Variability, Response Chunking and Planning Errors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Falk Lieder & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Marta I Garrido & Karl J Friston, 2013. "A Neurocomputational Model of the Mismatch Negativity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Emily R.A. Cramer, 2013. "Vocal deviation and trill consistency do not affect male response to playback in house wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 412-420.
    17. Patrick D McMullen & Erin Z Aprison & Peter B Winter & Luis A N Amaral & Richard I Morimoto & Ilya Ruvinsky, 2012. "Macro-level Modeling of the Response of C. elegans Reproduction to Chronic Heat Stress," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Izzet B Yildiz & Katharina von Kriegstein & Stefan J Kiebel, 2013. "From Birdsong to Human Speech Recognition: Bayesian Inference on a Hierarchy of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Jaroslav Vítků & Petr Dluhoš & Joseph Davidson & Matěj Nikl & Simon Andersson & Přemysl Paška & Jan Šinkora & Petr Hlubuček & Martin Stránský & Martin Hyben & Martin Poliak & Jan Feyereisl & Marek Ros, 2020. "ToyArchitecture: Unsupervised learning of interpretable models of the environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-50, May.
    20. A. Barri & M. T. Wiechert & M. Jazayeri & D. A. DiGregorio, 2022. "Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.